Robert Simon
August 26th, 2005, 12:33 PM
This is both a film-look and a Mac question:
I'm what you might call a serious hobbyist, and I just want my images to look the best they can (and I've learned A LOT from these forums: thanks!)
I've read about Magic Bullet and the Nattress filters for improving the film look and I recently downloaded the Nattress demos to try out the film looks/de-interlacing.
There is no question that the filter improves the look and does it quickly. But to my inexperienced eye it doesn't look noticably different than what I get by applying de-interlace filters and adjusting color and saturation within FCE. However, to this point I'm just comparing on my computer screen, not on a TV where I will watch the final project.
1) When you apply filters such as these, is the comparative result that you see on a computer screen way different than on a TV?
2) Does the simple de-interlace filter in FCE reduce resolution?
3) Is there anything I should be aware of if I use film-look filters along with slo-mo?
Thanks in advance!
I'm what you might call a serious hobbyist, and I just want my images to look the best they can (and I've learned A LOT from these forums: thanks!)
I've read about Magic Bullet and the Nattress filters for improving the film look and I recently downloaded the Nattress demos to try out the film looks/de-interlacing.
There is no question that the filter improves the look and does it quickly. But to my inexperienced eye it doesn't look noticably different than what I get by applying de-interlace filters and adjusting color and saturation within FCE. However, to this point I'm just comparing on my computer screen, not on a TV where I will watch the final project.
1) When you apply filters such as these, is the comparative result that you see on a computer screen way different than on a TV?
2) Does the simple de-interlace filter in FCE reduce resolution?
3) Is there anything I should be aware of if I use film-look filters along with slo-mo?
Thanks in advance!