Mark Woollard
August 24th, 2005, 07:16 AM
I've used a Sony ECM 44B for interviews for several years now. While no client has ever complained, I thought the sound was just a little muddy.
So I took my Z1 into an audio supplier to do an A/B comparison between a Sanken COS11 with the Sony. I recorded HDV (my usual format these days) so the sound was mpeg layer II. I captured Cineform intermediate and played created a take for each channel so I do an A/B switch on the same material.
I was surprised that I could not hear a difference in the sound quality between the two mics. The only difference was that in recording, I had to set the Z1 level control to 9 on the 44B's channel to match the Sanken set at 4. I would have thought this would have meant I would hear mic preamp noise from the Sony during quiet points in the taping. Not so.
I couldn't tell the difference between the two. And yes, both sounded just a little muddy to my ears.
I'm thinking it must be one or more of the following:
1) the camera's preamps aren't good enough to reveal the differences
2) the MPEG layer II format somehow strips out the differences
3) capturing to Cineform intermediate strips out the differences
4) my 55 year old ears are getting muddy
5) there isn't much difference in the sound from lav mics properly placed on the subject.
Any experience/thoughts?
So I took my Z1 into an audio supplier to do an A/B comparison between a Sanken COS11 with the Sony. I recorded HDV (my usual format these days) so the sound was mpeg layer II. I captured Cineform intermediate and played created a take for each channel so I do an A/B switch on the same material.
I was surprised that I could not hear a difference in the sound quality between the two mics. The only difference was that in recording, I had to set the Z1 level control to 9 on the 44B's channel to match the Sanken set at 4. I would have thought this would have meant I would hear mic preamp noise from the Sony during quiet points in the taping. Not so.
I couldn't tell the difference between the two. And yes, both sounded just a little muddy to my ears.
I'm thinking it must be one or more of the following:
1) the camera's preamps aren't good enough to reveal the differences
2) the MPEG layer II format somehow strips out the differences
3) capturing to Cineform intermediate strips out the differences
4) my 55 year old ears are getting muddy
5) there isn't much difference in the sound from lav mics properly placed on the subject.
Any experience/thoughts?