Dan Wells
June 21st, 2011, 09:48 PM
I'm thinking of taking my GH2 for a 272 mile walk on Vermont's Long Trail (and, if it works out, perhaps the 2200 or so miles of the Appalachian Trail next year). I need a tripod/head combo in the 2.5 lb range in order to make the total weight feasible! I think the lightest Gitzo legs (their 0 series) and either Gitzo's smallest fluid head (the G2180) or perhaps the Manfrotto 700RC2 might get into that range... Does anyone have a recommendation between these two, or know of other ultralight options (anyone else's 1.5 lb legs that aren't QUITE as expensive as Gitzo's, and/or another fluid head in the 1 lb range)?
In an ideal world, I'd have a head that switched between video and still modes like the GH2 does (flip a switch and it's a 3-way panhead?), but the one Manfrotto head I've seen that does this (the 055) takes up my entire weight budget without legs... Why can't Manfrotto make a smaller version of this head for the many 2-4 lb HDSLR rigs out there?
Remember that, even with the "big" 100-300 lens, the GH2's only 2.1 lbs, and it's 1.4 or so with the smaller 14-42. This is a seriously light camera (actually lighter than many consumer handycams), and the issue with a head is going to be being overdamped, not underdamped.
Isn't it amazing that there is a sub 2 lb camera that does what the GH2 does? I shot it against an EX1 recently, and was surprised by just how close it came (while weighing much less than half as much and taking better than decent stills as well as video). No, it's not a RED for video (never seen one, but have seen footage - amazing!), nor a Nikon D3x (which I own and have used for years) for stills, but it's closer than it has any right to be for what it weighs...
In an ideal world, I'd have a head that switched between video and still modes like the GH2 does (flip a switch and it's a 3-way panhead?), but the one Manfrotto head I've seen that does this (the 055) takes up my entire weight budget without legs... Why can't Manfrotto make a smaller version of this head for the many 2-4 lb HDSLR rigs out there?
Remember that, even with the "big" 100-300 lens, the GH2's only 2.1 lbs, and it's 1.4 or so with the smaller 14-42. This is a seriously light camera (actually lighter than many consumer handycams), and the issue with a head is going to be being overdamped, not underdamped.
Isn't it amazing that there is a sub 2 lb camera that does what the GH2 does? I shot it against an EX1 recently, and was surprised by just how close it came (while weighing much less than half as much and taking better than decent stills as well as video). No, it's not a RED for video (never seen one, but have seen footage - amazing!), nor a Nikon D3x (which I own and have used for years) for stills, but it's closer than it has any right to be for what it weighs...