Wayne Morellini
August 21st, 2005, 09:37 AM
I hope this doesn't offend anyone.
I was just thinking, and it occurred to me that the HC1 must have video test modes for testing the full sensor during servicing, but this is likely to be hidden away in servicing functions, or on a hidden digital/analogue port like I've heard about on the JVC GY-500 (though it is likely they would just use the component port).
There might be a video test mode for progressive (as we understand it can capture progressive stills) and interlace, with a resolution upto 1920*1440 resolution of the sensor. The test mode might even supply the data in a raw 4:4:4 form to show every pixel under the single chip colour filter array (IE like the Bayer pattern). This would enable very high quality processing and compact storage of uncompressed footage compared to 4:2:2 or 4:2:0.
I know people have acceded the service items on cameras before, and I've heard of people hacking the HC1, has anybody heard of anything?
A raw per pixel output would probably show up as a monochrome image of every pixel (either one of the component lines, or all of them changing together) or just the component line matching the filtered colour of pixel at each position.
I was just thinking, and it occurred to me that the HC1 must have video test modes for testing the full sensor during servicing, but this is likely to be hidden away in servicing functions, or on a hidden digital/analogue port like I've heard about on the JVC GY-500 (though it is likely they would just use the component port).
There might be a video test mode for progressive (as we understand it can capture progressive stills) and interlace, with a resolution upto 1920*1440 resolution of the sensor. The test mode might even supply the data in a raw 4:4:4 form to show every pixel under the single chip colour filter array (IE like the Bayer pattern). This would enable very high quality processing and compact storage of uncompressed footage compared to 4:2:2 or 4:2:0.
I know people have acceded the service items on cameras before, and I've heard of people hacking the HC1, has anybody heard of anything?
A raw per pixel output would probably show up as a monochrome image of every pixel (either one of the component lines, or all of them changing together) or just the component line matching the filtered colour of pixel at each position.