John MacPherson
April 12th, 2011, 03:00 PM
I have been wrestling with the Juicedlink and Beachtek options for sound with a 7D to bypass agc.
However thinking longer term the extra $$ for the SD MixPre might be a wiser option, given the higher quality, although of course I would still have the agc to deal with.
If Magic Lantern appears for the 7D I can avoid the agc, but until then I am happy to do double sound and go mic > mixpre > Edirol. (I have access to a free Edirol RO9.)
Question is - as I am a complete ignoramus regarding sound but learning quickly - is the Edirol a quality enough device to use as a 'bit bucket' with the mixpre, or would it defeat the quality advantage of the mixpre in some way I am unaware of?
I have seen a few reviews of nature recordists using MixPre > RO9 and they seem pretty pleased with it.
The Edirol does 24-bit/48kHz recordin so I presume thats ok.
However thinking longer term the extra $$ for the SD MixPre might be a wiser option, given the higher quality, although of course I would still have the agc to deal with.
If Magic Lantern appears for the 7D I can avoid the agc, but until then I am happy to do double sound and go mic > mixpre > Edirol. (I have access to a free Edirol RO9.)
Question is - as I am a complete ignoramus regarding sound but learning quickly - is the Edirol a quality enough device to use as a 'bit bucket' with the mixpre, or would it defeat the quality advantage of the mixpre in some way I am unaware of?
I have seen a few reviews of nature recordists using MixPre > RO9 and they seem pretty pleased with it.
The Edirol does 24-bit/48kHz recordin so I presume thats ok.