Arkady Bolotin
December 14th, 2010, 10:37 AM
Perhaps, one of the most neglectable (or the least familiar) features of the AVCHD video standard is support for extended-gamut color space YCC (or xvYCC for short).
Since its inclusion in AVCHD in 2006, Sony and Panasonic actively promote xvYCC (under different names though; for example, Sony uses name “xvColor”) by offering to record in xvYCC with their AVCHD-based camcorders.
However, only few people have chosen to record in xvYCC so far, while many others did not bother to give it a go (even for the sake of curiosity) considering xvYCC as a marketing gimmick. But really, is it only a gimmick?
According to PC Magazine Encyclopedia, xvYCC is a color space with 1.8 times as many colors as standard RGB (sRGB). Whereas sRGB provides a portion of the color spectrum, xvYCC can display every color the human eye can absorb.
This sounds like a very great idea. Still, what does that do in real life? Is it the case of the next technology's first attempt, which is just not ready yet for the time being? Can we already see a clear difference?
In this thread, I am going to show you that, yes – we can already see superior xvYCC colors even without xvYCC-enable TV (but you should have a reasonably modern television or a PC display driven by NVidia, AMD or Intel graphics hardware), and, yes – the difference between xvYCC and sRGB is evident and important enough to justify the effort.
Please observe the results I have got experimenting with xvYCC. I recorded a Munsell ColorChecker Card (see the first attachment) in sRGB and xvYCC color spaces; then I cut colored squares from the frames of the recorded footage and put them together (for the purpose of comparison) so that each xvYCC square would partially overlap the corresponding sRGB square (see the second attachment).
Look closely: you may see that the difference between extended- and standard-gamut color spaces is real, and it is manifested chiefly in the pairs of yellow, green, cyan, and violet squares.
Of course, somebody always could say, well, all right, I see some subtle difference, but the question is “So what? What it can do for me in recording real-life colors?”
Please look at the attachments three (Blue Car.jpg) and four (Flowers.png). They are frames grabbed from xvYCC-recoded clips filming real-life colors. As you can see, even though the difference between xvYCC and sRGB might be subtle, it can help your brain switch into a “real” mode, with the images popping off the screen.
Since its inclusion in AVCHD in 2006, Sony and Panasonic actively promote xvYCC (under different names though; for example, Sony uses name “xvColor”) by offering to record in xvYCC with their AVCHD-based camcorders.
However, only few people have chosen to record in xvYCC so far, while many others did not bother to give it a go (even for the sake of curiosity) considering xvYCC as a marketing gimmick. But really, is it only a gimmick?
According to PC Magazine Encyclopedia, xvYCC is a color space with 1.8 times as many colors as standard RGB (sRGB). Whereas sRGB provides a portion of the color spectrum, xvYCC can display every color the human eye can absorb.
This sounds like a very great idea. Still, what does that do in real life? Is it the case of the next technology's first attempt, which is just not ready yet for the time being? Can we already see a clear difference?
In this thread, I am going to show you that, yes – we can already see superior xvYCC colors even without xvYCC-enable TV (but you should have a reasonably modern television or a PC display driven by NVidia, AMD or Intel graphics hardware), and, yes – the difference between xvYCC and sRGB is evident and important enough to justify the effort.
Please observe the results I have got experimenting with xvYCC. I recorded a Munsell ColorChecker Card (see the first attachment) in sRGB and xvYCC color spaces; then I cut colored squares from the frames of the recorded footage and put them together (for the purpose of comparison) so that each xvYCC square would partially overlap the corresponding sRGB square (see the second attachment).
Look closely: you may see that the difference between extended- and standard-gamut color spaces is real, and it is manifested chiefly in the pairs of yellow, green, cyan, and violet squares.
Of course, somebody always could say, well, all right, I see some subtle difference, but the question is “So what? What it can do for me in recording real-life colors?”
Please look at the attachments three (Blue Car.jpg) and four (Flowers.png). They are frames grabbed from xvYCC-recoded clips filming real-life colors. As you can see, even though the difference between xvYCC and sRGB might be subtle, it can help your brain switch into a “real” mode, with the images popping off the screen.