This is my first full scale production filmed almost entirely on a borrowed 550D.

Waukesha County, Wis UPCI Unity Service on Vimeo

This production consisted of the following all performed by me:

Production
write basic script for production
obtain necessary consent from filmed parties
1 1/2 days on-site interviews w/HD cam, outboard audio, lighting
1/2 day remote audio multitracking (includes all mic's, xfrmr isolated mic/line splits, etc. FOH does nothing but mix FOH)
1/2 day multicam HD filming

Post
serve as filmmaker responsible for taking a request ("videotape our unity service") and converting that idea into a coherent visual experience where a completely independent, non-participating viewer can fully understand the story idea <--- (by far the most difficult part of this project)
sync all outboard audio with multiple cameras' footage
final mix & master 2.0 soundtrack
color correct & color grade all footage
edit all footage based upon script
render finished product for multiple platform compatibility (DVD, Youtube HD, Vimeo, Android, iPhone, etc.)
manage all license and permission requests from copyright holders


Not bad for a $750 camera...

Hoping you can help me having just ordered one[550D] i am hoping my footage wont need C/C, i have always been happy with my current HV30s color,also how much footage did you get from one battery at best quality.

Not a fan of the content , but you delivered the message nicely. Relay professional looking, for a novice aye such as my own.




But hey , i will ask you a pretty generic question . What lenses did you use ? :)

well, i don't own the 550D i used for this shoot - i borrowed one from a friend to see how well it would hold up for my style of shooting. but if i remember correctly, you can either set a custom white balance or use the default (daylight). you don't have multiple presets for tungsten, fluorescent, cloudy, etc. so unless you take the time to set a custom white balance under all possible lighting conditions, you will probably need to color correct.

having a second battery is absolutely essential with this cam. you will not get much more than an hour of continuous shooting (well, as continuous as possible with the recording limits).

i used a 30-yr old Pentax SMC M 50/1.4 and used it wide open for almost all content

Canon EOS 550D Review | PhotographyBLOG (http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/canon_eos_550d_review/) it seems there are a number of WB options,just hoping the stock lens will do for now.

IMO for serious work, the stock lens is useless. fast manual primes is where the money's at with these machines.

If you've got the light, the stock lens will do. Not the best, not the worst. But yea, getting into some decent glass is where it's at for these cameras.

thanks This is just for my home use, if the 18-55mm stock lens is no good whats the point, basic cams come with fixed zoom lenses of various zoom ie 10/12 14x so the stock lens should be of this standard, i mostly film outdoors so if the stock lens wont give me decent film to start i am in a pckle as theres no more money for a while for extra lenses.

the kit lens looks ok in this film http://ninofilm.net/blog/2010/02/23/canon-550d-review/

I have the stock lens (18-55) as well, and will be making judicious use of it until I purchase the primes I need. I shoot in rather dim conditions that I cannot light on regular occasions so I need faster glass. Were it not for that, I wouldn't be in any hurry to replace the stock glass.

If you're shooting in daylight for personal use, the stock lens will do what you need it to do. With experience, you'll be able to decide if your projects and shooting style need something faster, longer, wider, sharper, or whatever.

It's best to go for lenses that meet your needs, rather than the lenses that others happen to like. And the stock lens is likely to meet your immediate needs for very little money.

Martyn, the stock lens is fine and resolves more than enough for the video functionality in these DSLR's...I'm pretty sure that point has been scientifically proven. FOR ME, however, the stock lens feels like cheap plastic compared to the manual lenses we used 25-30 years ago, probably because it IS plastic. I don't think there's any real "glass" in the lens at all.

I was raised on fully manual old school cameras that used real glass with real focus rings and real aperture rings. After spending so much time using lenses (shooting stills) with those physical properties, I refuse to give them up. I don't want ANY autofocus, autoaperture features because I want to have total control like we HAD to have before Canon released the EOS product 30 years ago.

So, for my style of shooting, this is what I have concluded - and that includes never using a zoom lens either. Obviously, this is just me, and Jon is absolutely correct. You should use your own preferences in your buying decisions.

Aaron,

I totally agree, and for much the same reasons. Though I don't believe the EOS is 3o years old. I was still using a rangefinder back then (and an AE1 when I got to school). I bought an EOS10s in the early 90s and that was a lot of fun.

Anyway, the manual lenses are a treat. However, for someone who's not cut their teeth on the glass we did, it's a luxury. As I get back into building my prime collection, I am reminded of how lovely they were. But we are working in an era where everyone wants auto-everything. No one wants to do things manually any more. I am a veritable dinosaur on set with my light meter. But it's amazing how I always get the shot without a histogram or waveform monitor within 20 miles. It's like magic to the young guys!

There's lots of ways to get things done. And the kit lens is a necessary evil. What ever happened to selling bodies with a piece of decent 50mm glass on it? At least you had ONE piece of fast glass in our collection to get you started.

I am using a lot of old glass with my 5D and my T2i, including some older zooms. I went with Nikon primes, because they all sport the same filter sizes, and are easily adapted to the cameras. They work on both cameras. I have a bag full of great older glass that I assembled for around $700.00. And odd lots also can get you into an interesting lens. I bought a 2 lens deal once, and the throw away lens included turned out to be a decent Vivitar 135mm lens. And along the way, I bought a 28-80 mm Pentax K mount Takumar zoom vintage 1980s dirt cheap, that has turned out to be a great walk around lens for my 5d, and that has a great macro feature too.

So your budget does not have to create a limitation to shooting with great lenses.

my fault Perrone, it was March 1987. and i do remember that period very well. a lot of pro's dumped their fully manual kits and jumped on the EOS bandwagon. as i've read recently, many of them are regretting that decision considering the rarity and the very special nature of many of those old, fast lenses - like the Pentax M 85/1.8. Thankfully, my dad kept his LX system and I get to enjoy using his lenses in ways that no one could ever possibly imagine at that time, LOL!

"I am a veritable dinosaur on set with my light meter."

Haha, my 8x10 kodak gray card is tucked safely in my blackbird case. sounds like we are right on the same page, bro!

Not a fan of the content, but you did a very good job.
The shots are good, editing and structure is solid. It all flows perfectly.
The look is beautiful for this type of video.
I'm editing now a feature length rock documentary shot with the 5d. It's a challange to shoot documentary footage with these cams, and you sure did a good job.
Congrates!

Thanks Yaniv! Regardless of the content, I strive to produce the best possible product for my clients, both in terms of the visual AND audio aspects of the end product.

I'm all in regarding the quality of the piece.

A couple questions-
Would you describe your focus pulling workflow?

How did you do those micro moves during the interviews?

Did you hold the shutter speed at 1/50 or 1/60 or? I sometimes have trouble with too much light shooting wide open at 2.8/24p/50th...did you run into that issue at all?

thanks

"How did you do those micro moves during the interviews?"

really good question...YouTube - Fault Lines - Dying Inside: Elderly in prison (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xvqj8hgxRfg&feature=player_embedded#)!

this is the video that gave me the idea of using my slider during the interviews; so I give this guy the credit. (this is an incredibly well done piece)

Shooting at 1.4, I had to continually pull focus as I moved the camera closer to the interviewees. And this was all filmed @ 1080/24P, shutter was 1/50 sec.

"Would you describe your focus pulling workflow"

I'm not sure I know how to respond to this question. I didn't use a FF, nor would I ever with a DSLR on sticks. I like to keep my hand on the lens barrel because it provides just a bit of resistance that forces me to pan slowly and enables me to make continual focus changes throughout the pan without jarring the camera. I prefer to use the onboard 3" LCD screen over the cheap 7" Lilliput screen I have because the onboard screen seems to be so much higher rez, which helps me pull focus quickly. Other than that, I eye it up and let it rip like everyone else. I do look for highly detailed patterns in objects and clothing, and I find that is as close as it gets to the split screens in the old manual SLRs of many years ago. It helps having a lot of experience using these old lenses too - I started shooting film on those old manual cameras when I was ~ 10, I'll be 39 in a couple of weeks.

I think the 1.6x crop factor vs. FF is absolutely perfect for employing selective focus without going so far that focus simply becomes unmanageable. I plan on buying several 550Ds after seeing the results.

Nice work Aaron!

Visually, you made some not-so-outwardly-pretty-people look quite nice. And unlike much of what's produced today from various religious perspectives (and main-stream media, for that matter), you conveyed a positive message. From the perspective of a one-time athiest with a BA in "religions of the world," I like seeing people who are passionate about whatever they believe, assuming that passion doesn't justify deliberate harm to another.

Again, very nice work!