View Full Version : Radio Interference
Tom Elliott July 18th, 2005, 05:20 PM I just finished a video assignment.
I was going to use the AC outlet at the clients office.
However when I plugged into the AC outlet I got a very powerful radio transmission from Cuba. I was going to have all five people with their own lapel microphone.
I had to end up using the camera microphone and the camera runnining on a battery.
WHY?
Yours truly,
Tom Elliott
Don Palomaki July 18th, 2005, 06:29 PM Were you using wireless or wired mics?
Was everything OK on battery power?
Pleae give details of the setup.
Tom Elliott July 18th, 2005, 07:31 PM All mics were wired going through a battery powered mixer. The only thing on ac power was the 4x6 auxiliary monitor.
When the monitor was was disconected, no more radio.
Jay Massengill July 19th, 2005, 07:46 AM What camera, audio mixer and video monitor were you using? Does your audio mixer, all your wired mics and the connection to the camera use balanced cabling?
Without some further testing it will be difficult to say exactly which pieces in the chain are combining to create the problem. The monitor may just be the final link and not the whole problem.
It could be a bad cable, a problem with the mixer, a problem with the AC wiring, or your camera may be prone to audio problems when using an AC powered video monitor. (There's about a dozen more I could list, but you get the idea.)
In some cases using an isolation transformer like an Ebtech Hum Eliminator between the mixer and the camera can solve the problem, but in this case that's not certain at all.
Tom Elliott July 19th, 2005, 10:23 AM Ok, here comes the detail.
The office was on the 22n floor facing the Atlantic here in Miami.
The secretaries in the law office complain about the Cuban radio station being heard as they playback the dictation.
====
Camera: Canon GL2
====
Audio mixer:Radio Shack 4 Channel stereo microphone mixer. model 7A5 powered by a nine volt battery or a DC9v100ma transformer that you plug into the normal ac outlet - I only use the battery for I ALWAYs get a 50/60 cycle background hum on the sound track.
====
The mics are off the shelf Radio Shack omni directional battery powered.
====
Video Monitor: Made by Marshall. A small 4x6portable that is ac powered or battery powered. In the past I used it powered off the ac outlets in offices because the battery that came with it does not last long, only about 90 minutes.
====
What is balance cabeling? Would balance cableing mean XLR cables?
Are there balanced/unbalaced XLR cables?
I use/have NO XLR cables or mics.
The monitor was the ONLY item using the power from the buildings ac outlets.
When I disconnected the monitor and used the monitor of the GL2 NO MORE RADIO STATION.
Since I was really upset I had RIPPED the mic cables/mixing board out of the loop (creating a massive mess) and used the camera mic only.
Then I got the over head airconditioning sounds from the vents. At the time of the recording I felt that the ac sound would be disturbing. As I write this and making the dupes for the client the ac sound is not as disturbing as I had first thought.
I did a few tests with the PPRO1.5 sound controls an found I could eliminate alot, not all, of the airconditioning sounds.
Had I not been so hasty in removing the mic set up and been able to use the mics on each person the ac sound would have been totally eliminated since the GL2 was on 100% manual.
That is about it.
Many thanks for the input and help.
Yours,
Tom
Stephanie Wilson July 19th, 2005, 02:56 PM Hey Tom,
I put your dilemma to my friend who is a satellite truck engineer and he immediately figured out the problem.
According to him the building is acting as a giant antenna and because Cuba doesn't place RF limits on their radio stations there's tons of it flying around Miami. So when you plugged the monitor in to the wall you plugged into the building ground and therefore picked up the radio station. The RF then traveled along your video cable into the camera. That's why unplugging the monitor solved the problem.
You have to ISOLATE the ground in these circumstances and the cheapest way to accomplish this is by using a ground lifter. These are the little grey 70 cent dohickies (technical term) that convert 3 prong cords into 2 prong cords. He also said the secretaries should ask the lawyers to use these on their dictation machines.
If this doesn't work you may need a video isolation transformer, but these cost a couple hundred bucks. Might be a good investment however if you continue to have problems in Miami.
Post again if this doesn't make sense to you and I will try again.
Good luck!
Stephanie
Steve House July 19th, 2005, 04:23 PM Hey Tom,
....
If this doesn't work you may need a video isolation transformer, but these cost a couple hundred bucks. Might be a good investment however if you continue to have problems in Miami.
....
Stephanie
You can make a video isolation transformer that MIGHT work with a pair of 300 ohm to 75 ohm transformers connected back to back. Get one of those little thingys (another technical term) designed to match a 300 twin-lead TV antenna cable to a "F" connector input, looks like a squareish piece of plastic with a couple of screws on one side and a push-on coaxial connector on the other. Here's a picture of one:
- http://www.eenid.us/200-510.html
Get a second that does the reverse, looks like a liitle barrel with an "F" conntector on one end and a 300 ohm twin lead pigtail on the other. Another pitcher:
- http://www.eenid.us/200-500.html.
Connect them back to back with the spade lugs on one to the screws on the other. Instant 75 ohm ground isolation transformer for less than $5.00.
Tom Elliott July 19th, 2005, 04:53 PM Very interesting, I knew about the 3 to 2 prong conversion adaptor plug, (and the building as an antenna) sometimes it handles the 50/60 cycle hum and sometimes it does not.
the ohm dew-hicky seems like a good idea however the Marshal video monitor I use only has BNC or RCA plugs to attach to the out video of the GL2. just how is the OHM attached to the monitor?? I put the monitor on an articulated arm which is attached to my tripod. I have noticed at some weddings that the video guy has normal 12 volt car battery attached to his rolling tripod to power his camcorder and moble sound equipment. Like I say when all are running off batteries there is to radio and no 5o/60cycle hum.
Next...;-)
Anyway, after searching on the net, it looks like a major portable sound upgrade: shielded xlr cables, mics and mixing board of a special transformer to handle the radio and the 60/50 cyle stuff.
I mean it is solvable for look at all the major concerts that go wireless for the performers mic, and the video coverage.
Thanks again for all the input.
Yours,
Tom
Steve House July 20th, 2005, 04:12 AM Very interesting, ...the ohm dew-hicky seems like a good idea however the Marshal video monitor I use only has BNC or RCA plugs to attach to the out video of the GL2. just how is the OHM attached to the monitor?? ...Tom
As desribed the connectors ar "F" connectors such as a cable TV system but your local Radio Snak has RCA-F and BNC-F adapters for a couple of bucks. Run a short cable from your monitor to the transformer and another from the transformer to the camera video out. Or make up a couple of 75 ohm cables with an "F" connector on one end and an RCA on the other. FYI - ohms are the electrical units of resistance and impedance.
Tom Elliott July 20th, 2005, 06:22 AM Steve,
Thanks for your patience in this matter of radio interference. I will certainly give it a go for it was sure embarasing in front of the client. A painfull learning experience, only slightly relieved by finding out after packing up that it is a constant problem within the law office.
Right now it seems that the cheapest fastest solution is battery power all the way. And here I thought because of the new technology I was lighting up my location pacakage. 12volt car batteries are not LIGHT.
Hmm, a trickle charge from the ac outlet to the 12volt then to the equipment would that work or is it the fact of being connected in any way to the ac outlet creates the problem?
Any, these forums have always been most supportive.
Thanks.
Yours,
Tom
Steve House July 20th, 2005, 06:50 AM You're welcome, Tom. I have no idea if that little widget will help or not but for the price it's worth a try. So called "RFI" - radio frequency interference - is a not uncommon problem in almost very electronic application and can stem from a huge number of causes ranging from corrosion to faulty hookups to poor design of the equipment itself to simply being close to a strong transmitter.
I'll never forget the evening many years ago when I had a CB radio in my car. I was sitting in the parking lot of an all-night diner talking when the witress came out to tell me that my conversation was being broadcast loud and clear over their house music/PA system. LOL
There's a good general discussion of the problem and some trouble shooting ideas in the "Radio Amateurs Handbook" from the ARRL. Take a glance at it in your local library.
Greg Boston July 20th, 2005, 06:50 AM Steve,
Thanks for your patience in this matter of radio interference. I will certainly give it a go for it was sure embarasing in front of the client. A painfull learning experience, only slightly relieved by finding out after packing up that it is a constant problem within the law office.
Right now it seems that the cheapest fastest solution is battery power all the way. And here I thought because of the new technology I was lighting up my location pacakage. 12volt car batteries are not LIGHT.
Hmm, a trickle charge from the ac outlet to the 12volt then to the equipment would that work or is it the fact of being connected in any way to the ac outlet creates the problem?
Any, these forums have always been most supportive.
Thanks.
Yours,
Tom
That trickle charger would likely bring back your headaches with RF interference. You don't have to use car batteries. You can use smaller sealed lead-acid batteries that will run your monitor for a while such as the type used in many steadicam rigs.
Interesting story about that Cuban station. That's true about the other countries not applying limits to their output power like we do. In fact, the old ZZ Top song entitled "Heard it on the X" is all about high powered AM transmitters just over the border from Texas (with studios in Texas). The "X" in the song title refers to the fact that Mexican radio and tv station call letters begin with X as opposed to W and K assigned in the U.S. Anyway, the power levels on these stations can be so high that on humid nights, you can see corona discharge around the towers and birds that happen too close to those towers get fried. So, imagine how strong the RF field can be there in Miami. When you plugged in your power supply, it was converting the AC outlet to 12vdc which means it has diodes to rectify the AC current into DC current. Those diodes will also rectify an AM radio signal and as Stephanie's sat truck friend indicated, the whole building electrical system was your antenna. Just add audio amplifier and you have an AM radio receiver. It's really that easy to receive AM radio especially when the rf field is as strong as it is in that building (probably all of Miami for that matter.)
regards,
-gb-
Jay Massengill July 20th, 2005, 07:33 AM Never, ever use a 3-prong to 2-prong electrical adapter to defeat the safety ground. That's not what it's made for and this can be deadly. In this case it most likely wouldn't do any good anyway. It's not the ground connection that acts as an antenna (for FM anyway) for RFI but the hot and neutral lines.
Using an un-grounding adapter can solve a ground-loop hum, but you should still only use an isolation transformer to do this without breaking the safety ground.
In addition, cheap microphone elements like those in your mics and the dictation machines can act as radio receivers themselves, especially when used with unbalanced cables and an unprotected mixer. Adding the AC powered monitor that is also probably lacking good RFI protection makes it a worst case scenario for interference in your harsh environment.
Video isolation transformers are available for about $80.
http://www.markertek.com/SearchProduct.asp?item=JEN%2DVB1BB&off=2&sort=prod
The AT899 lavalier mic is a good bargain with excellent sound, small size and a variety of clips, as well as phantom or battery power. $200 each.
Good battery powered mixers are much more expensive, but there are cheap ones available such as the Behringer MXB-1002 for $100.
Greg Boston July 20th, 2005, 08:12 AM Never, ever use a 3-prong to 2-prong electrical adapter to defeat the safety ground. That's not what it's made for and this can be deadly. In this case it most likely wouldn't do any good anyway. It's not the ground connection that acts as an antenna (for FM anyway) for RFI but the hot and neutral lines.
Using an un-grounding adapter can solve a ground-loop hum, but you should still only use an isolation transformer to do this without breaking the safety ground.
I was going to mention in my previous post that it wasn't the building ground, but the hot and neutral lines acting as the antenna. Using a two prong adapter wouldn't have helped much for the rf interference. He wasn't hearing FM radio, that requires a lot more 'demodulation' components than does simple AM radio. Anytime you pick up interference that you can actually understand, as in the example above, it is AM.
regards,
-gb-
Stephanie Wilson July 20th, 2005, 12:06 PM I beg to differ with Jay on two points:
1) 3 to 2 prong adapters are used ALL THE TIME in the broadcast industry to avoid problems between shore and satellite truck power. I've run every kind of video and/or audio equipment at one time or another on a 2 prong adapter and haven't fried a thing.
2) A hum bucker wouldn't have solved the problem.
Stephanie
Tom Elliott July 20th, 2005, 12:12 PM To one and all,
You guys are great! Thanks!
Just spent about two hours in the local BJ wholesale store.
I think maybe I found an $100 solution (I will still have to add XLR mixer and mikes for complete solution) in the form or an emergency 12volt (rechargable) with two ac outlets and two cigarette outlets. All self contained and according to the specs it looks like it will power the small monitor, the GL2, and the mixing board: $89.99. Since BJs have a generous return policy I think I will give it a test by plugging everything in and see just how long it takes to run down.
ALSO since these lawyers hate hot lights (the GL2 does have good WB) I think I will also test flourescent flood for shadow fill. I can put gels over the bulb and since it burns cool the gels should last.
Ah me, these independent film makers ....
Also I plan to go to an RV Camper store here south of Miami to see what they have for independent power solutions that are light.
The above thing at BJs was much lighter that going the car battery route and then still haveing to get a trickle charger and outlet adapters. Oh the thing also as a meter, of sorts, to let you know just how much power is left.
I feel much better now. But, boy oh boy, it was was major mental pain and suffering at the start of yesterdays assignment.
Yours,
Tom
Stephanie Wilson July 21st, 2005, 01:38 AM You can make a video isolation transformer that MIGHT work with a pair of 300 ohm to 75 ohm transformers connected back to back. Get one of those little thingys (another technical term) designed to match a 300 twin-lead TV antenna cable to a "F" connector input, looks like a squareish piece of plastic with a couple of screws on one side and a push-on coaxial connector on the other. Here's a picture of one:
- http://www.eenid.us/200-510.html
Get a second that does the reverse, looks like a liitle barrel with an "F" conntector on one end and a 300 ohm twin lead pigtail on the other. Another pitcher:
- http://www.eenid.us/200-500.html.
Connect them back to back with the spade lugs on one to the screws on the other. Instant 75 ohm ground isolation transformer for less than $5.00.
I read your post to my satellite truck engineer friend today. He totally agreed with everything you suggested about making a video isolation transformer AND also included the following, "this guy knows what he's talking about - watch for his posts and you'll probably learn alot." Just thought you might like a little positive feedback on your obviously stellar knowledge. Thank you so much for helping to enlighten us all.
Stephanie
Steve House July 21st, 2005, 04:29 AM I read your post to my satellite truck engineer friend today. He totally agreed with everything you suggested about making a video isolation transformer AND also included the following, "this guy knows what he's talking about - watch for his posts and you'll probably learn alot." Just thought you might like a little positive feedback on your obviously stellar knowledge. Thank you so much for helping to enlighten us all.
Stephanie
Thanks for the accolades! I have to admit I can't claim credit for that isolation transformer idea - I borrowed it from the pages of one of Jay Rose's excellent books on audio production. My talent lies more into the direction of having a good memory <grin>.
Jay Massengill July 21st, 2005, 08:43 AM Stephanie, you are foolishly risking lives when you defeat the safety ground in an electrical system. I know that un-grounding adapters are used all the time, but it's a stupid practice that has gotten people killed in the past and will get people killed in the future.
It's my recommendation that defeating the safety ground never be done, but instead use an isolation transformer like the Ebtech Hum Eliminator for audio that I listed in my first post, or the Jensen isolation transformer for video that I listed in my second post. (Which oddly enough performs the same function as the isolation transformer you so highly praised.)
These isolation transformers are called "hum-buckers", so I don't understand your point #2 unless you are mistakenly calling an un-grounding adapter a "hum-bucker". It's the un-grounding adapter that I said wouldn't necessarily have been successful. An isolation transformer or transformers would more likely have been successful as I stated originally and as your engineer friend agrees.
Jay Massengill July 21st, 2005, 09:38 AM In addition, the Marshall monitors of that size all use un-grounded power supplies to begin with, so using an un-grounding adapter would definitely be of no help in this particular situation since none of the equipment in question is making a ground connection.
Tom Elliott July 21st, 2005, 10:47 AM In regards to my Marshal video monitor:
I use the three to two adapter not so much as to avoid the hum but rather to use it because the Marshal transformer male plug fits very tight in the adaptor and it inturn can have the prongs spread to form a tighter fit into a wall plug, otherwise the transformer just falls out of the wall plug. I have also got short (about 5 inches) grounded extension cords made for transformers if one is using a power strip that does not have the plugs far enough a part.
I think I have my CFO (lovely wife) convinced that it would be wise to get the portable power gizmo from BJs and do a test with all equipment plugged in to see just how long the power will last. If it can't do the job (I mean this is not filming "War and Peace" then I will just have to bit the bullett and get a bunch of batteries for each piece of equipment and change them out just like the one hour tapes of the GL2. I hope that the BJ thing will work. It could solve a lot of problems.
Yours,
Tom
Jay Massengill July 21st, 2005, 12:44 PM That's not a problem using the adapter in that manner, because you aren't breaking a ground connection.
I do the same as you with the extension cords. I have several 6-foot grounded cords with 3 outlets on the end. If at least one of the transformers is unpolarized and therefore can be physically reversed, then I can plug in 3 transformers on one socket and put them further away from my audio cables (since the transformers themselves can generate substantial hum).
Stephanie Wilson July 21st, 2005, 01:56 PM Stephanie, you are foolishly risking lives when you defeat the safety ground in an electrical system. I know that un-grounding adapters are used all the time, but it's a stupid practice that has gotten people killed in the past and will get people killed in the future.
It's my recommendation that defeating the safety ground never be done, but instead use an isolation transformer like the Ebtech Hum Eliminator for audio that I listed in my first post, or the Jensen isolation transformer for video that I listed in my second post. (Which oddly enough performs the same function as the isolation transformer you so highly praised.)
These isolation transformers are called "hum-buckers", so I don't understand your point #2 unless you are mistakenly calling an un-grounding adapter a "hum-bucker". It's the un-grounding adapter that I said wouldn't necessarily have been successful. An isolation transformer or transformers would more likely have been successful as I stated originally and as your engineer friend agrees.
Okay,
Here's the deal.
The safest way to deal with electricity is to have NO ground at all.
According to my engineer friend a hum-bucker is NOT the same thing as an isolation transformer.
BTW: it's called a ground lifter, not an "un-grounding" adaptor and I know what they are.
Steve House July 21st, 2005, 02:16 PM Okay,
Here's the deal.
The safest way to deal with electricity is to have NO ground at all.
...
An old Navy radioman once told me "Always keep one hand stuffed in your back pocket!"
Jay Massengill July 21st, 2005, 06:12 PM Unfortunately there's no way to achieve not having any ground at all. That's the whole point!!! If you want to provide the path to ground through your own body, or the body of someone on your crew, then be my guest...
I'll send my condolences.
Your engineer friend is simply incorrect. Humbuckers, which you first mentioned not me, use isolation transformers in their construction.
And it's not called a "ground-lifter" either, it's designed to CREATE a connection to ground when you plug into a power outlet that's only equipped with hot and neutral lines and a grounded box. You're misusing it when you don't connect the ground lug. I was simply referring to it by how you were misusing it.
I stand by everything I've said here and will stake my 20 years of professional experience in video and audio production as well as studio system engineering on it.
You're simply flat out wrong in recommending on a public forum to use an adapter to defeat the safety ground on equipment that is wired that way.
Okay, that's the real deal.
Tom Elliott July 21st, 2005, 07:32 PM Gee Wizz guys, I was just trying to eliminate the Cuban radio station from my tapes .... and I think that the only sure fire way is to for me and my small productions is to go 100% battery.
And I think that one of the reasons that the majors lug those semi-truck generators is for that exact reason .... eliminate all electrical interferance from the sound tracks, plus reducing electrocution of the grips that handle the lights, though one can still get zapped by the gerators if not hooked up properly.
Yours,
Tom
Greg Boston July 22nd, 2005, 01:20 AM Okay folks. This thread needs to end now. The 'tone' is getting above the threshold of DV-INFO's policies. There are merits to all of the above responses to the original post (mine included). I have a strong 25 yr + background in RF energy and electronics in general. This is not meant to toot my own horn as much as to say I understand both sides of the issue.
Any information or advice received on a public forum should be treated with caution because it comes with no guarantees or accountability. Use at your own risk should be the mantra of all public internet forums.
Thank you,
-gb-
Boyd Ostroff July 22nd, 2005, 06:18 AM I have to agree with Greg in this regard. This thread is now closed. We certainly appreciate everyone's input, but the discussion must remain on the professional and not the personal level. I've edited out a couple posts which crossed this line...
|
|