View Full Version : Canon 5D Mark II 2.0.3 Firmware Update - 24/25/30p Upgrade
Jenn Kramer March 1st, 2010, 07:22 PM Official news from Canon Europe:
Canon Europe - Canon adds 24 and 25fps HD Movie recording to the EOS 5D Mark II with Firmware 2.0.3 (http://www.canon-europe.com/About_Us/Press_Centre/Press_Releases/Consumer_News/Cameras_Accessories/EOS_5D_MarkII_Firmware_Media_Alert.asp?source=rss)
5D will have 24p, 25p and 30p at NTSC and PAL standard rates, histogram for video, manual audio control with meters and audio goes from 44.1KHz to 48KHz.
Firmware update will be available mid-March.
Jon Fairhurst March 1st, 2010, 07:44 PM The Tv mode will be useful when you have to shoot NOW. Set the camera to 1/50, let the camera auto expose, offset the exposure if needed, hit exposure lock and shoot. At least, that's how I expect it to work. I won't use it much, but if I'm in a hurry...
Heath Vinyard March 1st, 2010, 08:03 PM This is going to be really cool when it comes out.
Dutch Rall March 1st, 2010, 08:36 PM It's difficult to type and perform my happy dance at the same time, but that is what is going down.
Zac Williams March 1st, 2010, 08:39 PM The addition of manual audio level control is a bonus I honestly did not expect. I appreciate Canon going the extra mile to make the 5D II a true professional video solution for the type of work I do.
Jon Fairhurst March 1st, 2010, 08:50 PM No 720p50/60 is a bit of a disappointment. Maybe a T2i will become the slow motion and long lens cam.
No HD over HDMI. Bummer. Looks like there's more opportunity for Magic Lantern...
Steven Schuldt March 1st, 2010, 08:52 PM Now kicking Nikon all over the block. On behalf of everyone that cajoled, pleaded and pestered you into this excellent upgrade: thank you!
Eric Emerick March 1st, 2010, 09:46 PM Too bad the link to see footage is bad. Would love to see it. 2 weeks my friends, let loose the hounds!
Bill Binder March 1st, 2010, 10:46 PM YES!
No 60p is a bit disappointing, but the audio functionality is a nice bonus. It's nice to see Canon stepping things up. I love my 5D2 more than ever, heh...
Richard Hunter March 2nd, 2010, 05:40 AM Too bad the link to see footage is bad. Would love to see it. 2 weeks my friends, let loose the hounds!
The link works for me. Maybe you can try again, or clear your cache?
Richard
Pier Laurenza March 2nd, 2010, 05:54 AM "No 720p50/60 is a bit of a disappointment. Maybe a T2i will become the slow motion and long lens cam.
No HD over HDMI. Bummer. Looks like there's more opportunity for Magic Lantern... "
I totally agree with Jon, T2i/ 550D will be "the" B cam for the 5DmkII owners
Andy Wilkinson March 2nd, 2010, 06:10 AM Guys, this is great news for you 5DMkII owners. I can tell you that 50p (PAL) and 60p (NTSC) options being missing is not such a loss as you might think.
Only in special circumstances do I personally find the 50p acceptable on my 7D (because of the significantly increased moire/aliasing issues at this frame rate on Canon DSLRs). Sure, I love these frame rates on my EX3 (as that does not have these problems at all) but that's a very different tool and size of camera.
You've got some great new features coming to an already great camera. Rejoice!!! Just hope we get some of this goodness on the 7D one day - manual audio levels with meter and histogram for video, yes please!!!
Jim Froom March 2nd, 2010, 07:10 AM Finally. Long time coming.
I watched the 2 clips a couple of times and I'll reserve final judgment until I see full hd on a large screen or projector, but his slow mo on the jumps looked pretty good.
I'm thinking they are going to be selling a whole lot more cameras.
Daniel von Euw March 2nd, 2010, 07:14 AM No HD over HDMI. Bummer. Looks like there's more opportunity for Magic Lantern...
Hope this will be a hidden feature - if not i think this is a hardware problem.
Daniel
Roy Niswanger March 2nd, 2010, 07:50 AM Question for everyone since it wasn't mentioned here:
I purchased Cineform's Neo Scene to convert my 30fps .mov files from my 5DMk2 to standard 29.97fps NTSC .avi files to work in Vegas on my Windows machine. Does this new firmware mean my Neo Scene will be obsolete?
Thanks,
Roy
Pete Bauer March 2nd, 2010, 10:07 AM Does this new firmware mean my Neo Scene will be obsolete?Cineform folks are well aware of the upcoming firmware and have previously said they will support the change to 29.97.
Roy Niswanger March 2nd, 2010, 10:23 AM That's great news, I'll have to check up on that from Cineform...I just recently purchased my copy about 2 months ago.
So, to understand further, it will still benefit me to use Neo Scene to convert the updated footage from my 5DMk2 before bringing it into Vegas on Windows?
Thanks,
Roy
Art Varga March 2nd, 2010, 10:29 AM So, to understand further, it will still benefit me to use Neo Scene to convert the updated footage from my 5DMk2 before bringing it into Vegas on Windows?
Thanks,
Roy
Yes because Cineform converts the .mov file to .avi which is much friendlier to edit with in Vegas.
Chris Barcellos March 2nd, 2010, 10:31 AM Cineform is still of great benefit. AVCHD is not a very easy codec to edit. Transcoding to Cineform provides a rugged and stable codec for editing purposes. It will also correct issues inherent with the Canon codec to conform with your NLE so you image actually shows shadow and highlight detail.
Richard Gooderick March 2nd, 2010, 11:10 AM Wow. Audio monitoring as well. That is so good.
Erik Andersen March 2nd, 2010, 11:19 AM Yes, seeing the audio meters was a thrill!
In the Canon video the meters were on a unique menu screen. I wonder how they integrate with the live view display. Perhaps hitting the info button will show the meters as an overlay on live view?
Andy, there's increased aliasing on the 7D at 25p? But not at 24p?
Jon Fairhurst March 2nd, 2010, 11:43 AM There are meters, but I'm not sure about headphone monitoring.
Fingers crossed...
Chris Hurd March 2nd, 2010, 11:50 AM As far as I can tell, audio monitoring is only by visual indicator and the A/V output jack has not been re-purposed to provide only stereo audio output. Which is a shame, because most Canon camcorders offer a menu setting which will switch the function of the A/V output jack to a headphones jack. So it's definitely do-able, but I'm not sure they've done it here, unfortunately.
Jim Giberti March 2nd, 2010, 12:24 PM Really...that would be a pretty major oversight. You monitor audio with your ears not your eyes.
Evan C. King March 2nd, 2010, 03:51 PM I'm a jealous 7D user. Canon needs to show the whole range of cameras some manual audio control and histogram love.
Dylan Couper March 2nd, 2010, 06:29 PM I'm a jealous 7D user. Canon needs to show the whole range of cameras some manual audio control and histogram love.
Don't be jealous... you have 60p, better external controls, and $1000 more in your pocket. It ain't all bad. :)
Matthew Roddy March 2nd, 2010, 06:32 PM AND, you're much more likely to get a firmware update in less than the year+ it took us to get these tools...
Tramm Hudson March 2nd, 2010, 06:38 PM Looks like there's more opportunity for Magic Lantern...
I'm very pleased that Canon has recognized that several of the Magic Lantern features are worth re-implementing in the mainstream firmware release. The manual audio gain and audio meters are an absolute requirement for film makers; I imagine that those two alone will satisfy many of the Magic Lantern users and I applaud Canon for adding them to the camera. One thing that isn't clear from the sample video is if the meters are onscreen all the time or only in the menu screen.
In any event, I plan to support the 2.0.3 firmware as soon as it is available and we're able to find the few functions that we depend on in DryOS. It would be good to come up with the exact list of what is necessary to be found for the stubs.S file so that we can prioritize our search.
The other reason to continue with the Magic Lantern development is to implement features that Canon doesn't have any plans to support. Things like external devices on the USB, headphone monitoring, clock setting to SMPTE LTC and scripting languages. Maybe even hacks to restart filming after the 4GB limit has been hit (with a few second gap, unfortunately). 1080i HDMI may or may not work quite right, but it is an open front for development with the source code available to anyone who wants to hack on it.
Martin Koch March 3rd, 2010, 01:34 AM We all agree that we don't want to let the preamps of the 5D MKIIs do the amplification so if I calibrate the meters of the camera to the meters of an external preamp as shown in this video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwpDLo0NVps) at 3:40 do I really need live on-screen meters on the camera?
Jon Fairhurst March 3rd, 2010, 03:01 AM We don't know if we will get headphone monitoring from the camera with the Canon firmware. Some will want to monitor with headphones from the field mixer or preamp. The meters on the camera will be a safety blanket that lets you know that it's actually getting a signal. Getting a headphone signal from the mixer is no good if the audio cable isn't plugged firmly into the camera.
Eric Diosay March 3rd, 2010, 08:53 AM I'm very pleased that Canon has recognized that several of the Magic Lantern features are worth re-implementing in the mainstream firmware release. The manual audio gain and audio meters are an absolute requirement for film makers; I imagine that those two alone will satisfy many of the Magic Lantern users and I applaud Canon for adding them to the camera. One thing that isn't clear from the sample video is if the meters are onscreen all the time or only in the menu screen.
In any event, I plan to support the 2.0.3 firmware as soon as it is available and we're able to find the few functions that we depend on in DryOS. It would be good to come up with the exact list of what is necessary to be found for the stubs.S file so that we can prioritize our search.
The other reason to continue with the Magic Lantern development is to implement features that Canon doesn't have any plans to support. Things like external devices on the USB, headphone monitoring, clock setting to SMPTE LTC and scripting languages. Maybe even hacks to restart filming after the 4GB limit has been hit (with a few second gap, unfortunately). 1080i HDMI may or may not work quite right, but it is an open front for development with the source code available to anyone who wants to hack on it.
Definitely glad that you are still working on this, Tramm. Your impact is much appreciated.
While this update is great, I had hoped for a few more functionalities. The sad thing is, now that the engineers have finished this update, they will likely move on the the next iteration of the 5D. This could be the last Canon update for this camera barring hiccups with the new firmware, so hopes for 60p and 1080i out is dashed. ML could be our only hope for the continued evolution of the the current 5D.
Jim Giberti March 3rd, 2010, 11:19 AM We all agree that we don't want to let the preamps of the 5D MKIIs do the amplification so if I calibrate the meters of the camera to the meters of an external preamp as shown in this video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwpDLo0NVps) at 3:40 do I really need live on-screen meters on the camera?
Martin, ideally you always want to monitor the end of an audio chain, not the middle...and with phones, not a visual. Transient peaks and other issues including AC interference in the last cable etc. could be present in the last gain stage in the camera. You never rely on a good level and clean signal from a mixer that then gets cabled to another device. all that matters is the signal going to "tape".
If there were a problem at the 5DII then isolating it is simple in the signal path - mic>cable>mixer>cable>5D.
If you monitor it at the mixer and just rely on visuals then you can't identify signal path issues.
This goes back to my previous post. In the studio, one of the first lessons you learn in dealing with complex signal paths is the principle of unity gain and level matching. Even when things look great across the board, sometimes on dozens and dozens of VU meters, ultimately all that matters is what's coming out of the monitors - which is why most of us have very expensive monitoring systems and acoustically controlled rooms for mixing.
If you're recording audio into the 5D it's just a small portable version of this principle.
Paul Joy March 3rd, 2010, 11:20 AM Only in special circumstances do I personally find the 50p acceptable on my 7D (because of the significantly increased moire/aliasing issues at this frame rate on Canon DSLRs)
I totally agree, I picked up a 7D as a second camera to my 5D mainly because I wanted 720/60 and the ability to go from a wide prime to a long lens quickly. I was really disappointed in the results of the 7D at 720 though, I sent it back in the end and will probably go for a second 5D instead as having two different control setups kept catching me out. It would be nice if the Set/OK button on the 7D could be set to do video start / stop as an option :)
Jim Giberti March 3rd, 2010, 11:33 AM Ultimately we should be awfully pleased with a system that started out with gorgeous footage but flawed controls that now has gorgeous footage and extensive controls.
We bought what we bought knowing it's limitations. To Canon's credit, in just over a year they've evolved it to one of the coolest creative tools ever...for free.
Hey, you've now got on of the best photographic tools you could want and one of the best film making tools you could want, all in one small, affordable package.
It's got some moire issues but so do a lot of things and it doesn't limit me in any way.
It isn't RED but it's a lot closer to it than not (unless you're the .01% that's projecting in the theater)
It ain't perfect but neither is life, and I'm pretty happy with both.
Martin Koch March 3rd, 2010, 11:41 AM The meters on the camera will be a safety blanket that lets you know that it's actually getting a signal.
... all that matters is the signal going to "tape"...
Thanks for the replies Jon and Jim. That are good arguments which I didn't consider. Let's hope Canon also offers live audio level meters.
Richard Gooderick March 3rd, 2010, 04:48 PM We bought what we bought knowing it's limitations. To Canon's credit, in just over a year they've evolved it to one of the coolest creative tools ever...for free.
Well said. Let's hear it for Canon. I'm impressed.
Jack Tran March 3rd, 2010, 05:48 PM "Now, EOS 5D Mark II shooters will be able to monitor and manually adjust audio levels prior to shooting. In addition, the sampling frequency has increased from 44.1 KHz to 48 KHz."
I guest this means you dont have meters while actually recording. Weak.
Back to Magic Lantern....
Mike Watson March 3rd, 2010, 06:24 PM "Improved audio functionality will allow users to set sound record levels manually using a sound-level meter displayed on the LCD screen. The audio sampling frequency has also been increased from 44.1KHz to 48KHz, providing the optimum audio signal typically required for professional or broadcast material."
Peer Landa March 3rd, 2010, 07:13 PM I guest this means you dont have meters while actually recording. Weak.
Isn't it also a bit weak to be riding the audio levels while recording? AGC anyone?
-- peer
Brant Gajda March 4th, 2010, 08:46 AM With the Audio adjustment feature, does this mean they are allowing you to finally defeat the AGC or is that still in place?
Peer Landa March 4th, 2010, 09:08 AM With the Audio adjustment feature, does this mean they are allowing you to finally defeat the AGC or is that still in place?
That's correct -- the new software defeats the AGC.
-- peer
Nigel Barker March 4th, 2010, 09:36 AM Presumably the new software gives the option to disable the AGC.
Jack Tran March 4th, 2010, 10:24 AM Isn't it also a bit weak to be riding the audio levels while recording? AGC anyone?
-- peer
I dunno about you, but its nice to have CONFIRMATION that you STILL have audio while recording (whether it be meters or audio/headphones.)
-------------
Yes Audio Auto Gain can be turned off completely, by this firmware. And it looks like you can also dial in the amount of gain to be added too.
Audiowise, Nothing new of what Tramm already hasnt done.
Bill Binder March 4th, 2010, 11:04 AM Isn't it also a bit weak to be riding the audio levels while recording? AGC anyone?
-- peer
Not sure if this is what you were getting at, but yeah, I like to have control over my levels on the fly. First of all, if you're clipping, at least you can do something about it, and second of all, a human riding the gain a little here or there is a lot different than some dumb program doing it. In live event sound, the FOH will often ride the gain if necessary. I personally think of that as a completely different thing (e.g., a human doesn't max out the gain when there's no signal to the point of bringing the noise floor way up, but a human might ride the gain up for a quiet speaker or some other legit reason). Also, riding gain is a huge part of mastering audio, oftentimes it's much preferable to compression or limiting. Now, of course, typically mastering done in post, but the main point remains, that is manually riding gain has its uses and it's very different from AGC IMHO (not to mention how bad Canon's implementation of AGC was).
On another note, one thing that I worry about is how they set the gain based on the manual interface. Because of ML, we know there are actually two parts to the gain they use, analog and digital. I sure hope they ride the analog up first (with no digital), before they start dipping into the digital gain. I know that with a preamp and the digital gain down to zero, I get a pretty clean signal, but it wouldn't surprise me one bit if they messed that up. So, I wouldn't be surprised at all if some of us end up using ML just for audio reasons still (more control over how gain is applied, and live meters).
Jon Fairhurst March 4th, 2010, 12:21 PM Peer and Bill,
You're both right. Riding the gain poorly is no better than AGC. But riding the gain well can rescue a signal from clipping or being too low, and can potentially save time in post.
I've read of mixers pushing the gain at the end of phrases for speakers who tend to trail off their words. I know that I've had to do that in post more times than I'd like!
If AGC were as smart as a really skilled live mixer, I'd leave it on. ;)
Of course, if you can get a *really* clean 24-bit signal path, you can just set the levels conservatively and do everything in post without worrying about clipping or noise.
Ilya Mamonov March 4th, 2010, 02:36 PM Damn, just got Canon's newsletter and for a moment thought that download is already available. Nice tease :)
Brant Gajda March 4th, 2010, 03:12 PM That's correct -- the new software defeats the AGC.
-- peer
Then that would take care of all my requests. Can't wait to download and try it out.
|
|