George Griswold
February 20th, 2010, 08:57 AM
I did a sync test this AM with my SDX-900 using the SD 50 setting on the nano and I can't tell if it is OK. I have brought a 10 minute test into FCP and did a few screen grabs with the canvas showing a slate (homebrew), time line with audio waveform, and frame counter.
When I play the clip it is in sync after I play it once*, but the audio waveform on the time line shows the audio 1-2 frames late in reference to the video. I will do more testing, but was wondering if anyone has time over the weekend if they could try it out and see what they come up with. My hunch is that the FCP time line is drawing wrong and the clip is in sync. I will be rolling tape Tuesday regardless.
Like to see what others find with the SD sync. If you have time to check it out and post your results that would be great. I know this was one of the top things on the list for the new firmware so my hunch is that it is OK.
Thank you,
George
* FCP 7.01, Aja ioHD (ver 7.5), Mac 2x 3Ghz Quad Xeon.
When I play the clip it is in sync after I play it once*, but the audio waveform on the time line shows the audio 1-2 frames late in reference to the video. I will do more testing, but was wondering if anyone has time over the weekend if they could try it out and see what they come up with. My hunch is that the FCP time line is drawing wrong and the clip is in sync. I will be rolling tape Tuesday regardless.
Like to see what others find with the SD sync. If you have time to check it out and post your results that would be great. I know this was one of the top things on the list for the new firmware so my hunch is that it is OK.
Thank you,
George
* FCP 7.01, Aja ioHD (ver 7.5), Mac 2x 3Ghz Quad Xeon.