I'm searching for a shotgun mic that does an excellent job of picking up sound indoors without picking up noise that bounces off the walls. Most of my weddings are indoor but I do get a few outdoor. So I'm looking for a balance mic that can do both but is better for indoors. $300 - $700 range.

Thanks.

I don't think what you want exsists. First off a shotgun indoors is lousy except within a couple of feet of the talent. The farther back from the talent the less it will pickup the talent and the more ambient sound it will gather. Outdoors a shotgun can work well but again there are distance limitations.
Having said that, here's what I do for most weddings. On my B camera I DO use a shotgun but that is only used to pickup music. I can get away with it becaue the music is generally quite loud and the camera is usually not too far away from the music. If it is too far away or the design of the venue won't allow for the camera to get a clean "line of sight" as it were, I'll pull the mic, put it on a stand and run some XLR cable back to the camera, so the mic could be 20 feet or more away.
On my A camera I use an AKG Blueline hypercaroid mic BUT for a typical ceremony I don't evn use it as I run 2 wireless back to the camera. For the reception though I use the hypercaroid and a Sennheiser E604 drum mic placed by the DJs/bands speaker, with a plugin transmitter back to my camera. Great sound.
But getting back to the ceremony, a shotgun has definate limitations indoors and again I have never seen one that would fit the description you want atany price.
Perhaps someone else knows of one.

As shotgun mics go, I really like my Sennheiser ME66. I've been asked by at least two other videographers I've shot for, "Hey Alec...what type of shotgun were you using? I want to buy the same one."

Alec Moreno
http://www.1Day1ShotProductions.com

Kelly, unless we are suffering from being divided by a common language I would strongly advise against Don's suggestion of a hyper-cardiod microphone, simply because in my (and Sennheiser's - German) use of the term, you will get exactly what Don describes, sound other than from the "front" of the microphone.

Firstly you need to understand that direction microphones don't increase the sensitivity from the front but reject the sound from elsewhere. Specifically, hypercardiod microphones have virtually no rejection from the rear, which is one reason Don picks up more ambient sound than he would like.

On the other hand, cardiod (or what Sennheiser calls Super-cardiod microphones) reject sound from the sides and the rear, greater in face from the rear than the sides.

In general the longer the microphone is physically, the more sensitivity it will be from the front. Against that, if you're camera-=mounting it, the longer the microphone is the greater the chance you'll have of catching it in the frame. If you can afford it no-one would argue against the ME66. On the other hand if your "main" microphone is a radio channel you might feel as I do that it's too expensive for the job. We've been very satisfied with our Audio Technica AT897's.

Incidentally, sound bounces of all walls unless their specially treated as in an anechoic chamber, indeed it is the fabric and design of the walls which largely give a room its "sound" and certainly give the sound its "life". Even if you achieved it I don't think you'd like the sound of bounceless walls! If an echo really is a problem eg in a cathedral with a huge echo delay, the only solution is to close-mic the subject - which in weddings almost certainly means radios.

One final point, buy microphones that match. We've just bought a new Sennheiser miniature and the new model simply doesn't match the three older ones we have. We're now having to look at buying three more new model microphones.

Hope this helps.

I think the Sanken CS3e is better indoors than most shotguns.
But it's outside your budget.

Hmmm, I don't think I said to use the hyper, "On my A camera I use an AKG Blueline hypercaroid mic BUT for a typical ceremony I don't even use it as I run 2 wireless back to the camera. For the reception though I use the hypercaroid and a Sennheiser E604 drum mic placed by the DJs/bands speaker, with a plugin transmitter back to my camera. Great sound.
But getting back to the ceremony, a shotgun has definate limitations indoors and again I have never seen one that would fit the description you want at any price."

So yeah I guess I do advocate the hyper BUT only for receptions where I do want the ambient sound and where the drum mic will give me the stronger sound. It's my personal preference.
But let's remember what the OP wanted. A shotgun that would reject all sound from the sides and back, be able to grab quality sound from distances and work great indoors and out.
Once again, as far as I know, It doesn't exsist.

Sorry for misunderstanding you Don, but the OP also gave a price limit which your two radios simply wouldn't fit.

I therefore assumed you were recommending the hypercardiod to Kelly. I guess we'll have to agree to differ about the value of that. I'm perfectly happy with the ambient I get from three AT897s located around the reception (one on the camera taking the reaction shots of the guests), but that's just my view.

We do agree however, that what Kelly was seeking doesn't exist, indeed as I wrote, even if it did, neither she nor her client would care for the sound.

Hi Guys

I used to use an AT in the one camera days but after going thru a batch of shotguns I still seem to come back the Rode Videomic for great all round performance!! Yeah, I know it's only a $150 mic but it's a great backup mic if the wireless mics failed!! The only issue I have found is that outdoors I need to kick in -20db attenuation on the one XLR channel otherwise it's just too hot for loud sounds!! (It also has it's own -10db and -20db attenuators)

Chris

Hey Phillip, no problem. I got a bit carried away in my description. Yeah the wireless won't work for Kelly because of money and yep, the hyper will pick everything including someones cold. ;-)
I use an 897 on my B camera and it does a great job at the church for the music and get just enough voice to be a decent scratch track to sync the cams.
I used to use it for receptions but then started playing around with different mics and found the hyper and a wireless in front of the speakers worked nicely for me.
Just goes to show there are many ways to "skin the cat"
0|0
\_/

You ever tried using a stereo shotgun mic? One channel picks up from the front and the other channel picks up from the sides (more omni like).

Cody, I think perhaps you're confused by terminology and maybe I can help you out. There are stereo shotguns which are designed for a M/S (mid/side operation) which needs a mixer and allows the engineer to manipulate the stereo imagery in post so is unsuitable for sticking on a camera. However some if not all offer a matrixed L/R effect which will give you a stereo shotgun you can plug into your camera.

But before you invest in an expensive piece of kit, may I suggest you ask yourself why you need a stereo shotgun. Most of us use a shotgun to capture a specific sound source so you only need a mono microphone. If you need to put that source into a stereo image, use a general stereo mic and mix the two in post.

Phillip, I'm not confused, that's exactly what I'm talking about. Imagine you are shooting some bridal prep stuff and there is a conversation happening... you're focused on the bride, but a bridesmaid from the side says something that is priceless... the only problem is, she is off screen to the left. With a traditional hyper cardioid or uni-directional shotgun mic, it would not pick up the bridesmaid well at all. With a stereo shotgun (M/S) you can split it into two channels so it records the mid in the left and the side in the right (or however you like using a 5pin dual xlr). Now, when you get into post you can split the channels and have the best possible audio. I don't really like how a "matrixed" stereo signal sounds... personal preference though. I hope this clears up any confusion.

Cody, I can do no better than refer you to a description of M/S technique see Mid-Side Microphone Technique - WikiRecording (http://www.wikirecording.org/Mid-Side_Microphone_Technique).

As an example here is the Sennheiser MKH418S: Sennheiser | MKH418S - Stereo Shotgun Microphone | MKH418S | B&H (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/283358-REG/Sennheiser_MKH418S_MKH418S_Stereo_Shotgun.html#features)

For me, I use a 5D Mark II with dual system audio, but if you use a camera that has a left and right channel mic input (mini plug with TRS or XLR) then you can split that out. I typically split out 2 different wireless systems into the left and right of a mini plug cable so I can go back in post and make the left an individual fake stereo signal and the same thing with the right. With the sennheiser MKH418S (I believe audio Technica has a M/S mic too), it comes with a 5 pin XLR that you can split out into two channels so you can do just what I described above, OR you can just leave them as a mixed pair.

If I'm not making any sense as to why this would be beneficial (or I just don't make any sense at all!), then I apologize.

Cody, AT make four stereo mics which might interest you. AT8022 ($499) is a stereo line/gradient non-shotgun providing X/Y stereo (like the now unavailable AT825 which we have). The BP4025 is a higher spec ($799) but similar.

The BP4027 ($660) and BP4029 ($664) are stereo shotguns in M/S layout with switchable X/Y matrixed. They differ in length and are otherwise are very similar.

But please don't misunderstand the way they work; if you raise the level on one leg of an X/Y mic it will raise the sensitivity on that side but also completely unbalance the stereo image.

As I tried to explain before,an M/S mic is effectively three microphones which is why you need to put it through a mixer (and reverse one phase of the figure-of-eight element) and can't just plug it into your camera.

Thanks guys, I really just need a mic that will back up the wireless if they fail and pick up voices during the reception on an EX1r

A slightly different specification than your original message Kelly but easier to answer. If you can afford a Sennheiser ME66 that would be many people's first choice but we find AT897's more than adequate at a significantly lower price.

Incidentally in my experience it'll be your batteries that will fail before the radio mics themselves but it's wise to have backup.

The me66 is the workhorse of the mid-priced shotguns - you can also switch out the capsules on the k6 power module and use an me64 which will work better in "live" indoor settings, or an me67, whch would be preferred outdoors. The me66 is a reasonable compromise. It's a very hot mic - so you will often use it with ATTenuation on. This will help out the cheap pre-amps.

Thanks Phill. The ME66 is the one.

I am very pleased with the Rode NTG-2 I use with my Sony V1U and the Rode Videomic I use with my Canon HV20.

What wireless and/or Lav mics do you prefer using when shooting weddings? I am not looking for the absolute best of the best, but I would like to invest in ones which give quality sound.

Also, I know some of you like to use mics which hook onto the DJ's speakers during a reception. I was wondering what advantage this technique offers?

Thanks a alot in advance for the advice and insight :-)

The Me66 is a fantastic mic for outdoor usage.
But fails for indoor use due to the fact that it is too sensitive.

Shotgun mics are already at a disadvantage for indoor use, due to the fact that the mic itself is long and pickup up room reflections coming back to the mic. Add to the fact a very sensitive mic like the Me66 and I don't know if you will be happy using it indoors.

I prefer the AT897 or Rode NTG1 or NTG2, as both perform very good for all around indoor/outdoor use.

Just so you know, for indoor use you are better using a hyper-cardioid or cardioid mic, as they will have much better side rejection. Also remember, that to get the best audio, try to keep your mic as close to the source as possible. If you are 10-15 feet away form your audio source, then you might as well forget about good audio pickup.

Although I will say that the Neumann | KMR82I - Condenser Microphone | KMR 82 I | B&H Photo (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/146371-REG/Neumann_KMR_82_I_KMR82I_Condenser_Microphone.html) would work from a distance, but it's a very long mic.

Vishal,
I've been using the Audio Technic dual Channel (1821) receivr with 2 body paks for ceremonies for about 2 years. I've been very pleased with the sound but I am using Countryman EMW mics not the stock ones. For the reception I use a Sennheiser E604 drum mic with the AT plugin transmitter back to my camera and place that in front of the DJs speaker. That coupled with my AKG Blueline Hypercaroid on the camera gives me very controllable audio. I used to plug into the soundboard but stopped because I ran into a few DJs that had no idea what they were doing and could have really messed up my audio. By not relying on them directly, if my audio is messed up, then it's my fault and that hasn't happened in too many years to remember.
Keep in mind though that it's not just the mics and such, it's knowing how to use them within the limits of your audio gear and camera if you're recording straight back to the camera.
I NEVER put a piece of gear into play until I have put it thru it's paces under controlled situations, like mics. I put some good old rock and roll on my 600W surround sound system, crank it up and try different settings until I'm happy with what I get, then at least I have a starting point.
That's what I do, others have different ways, your choice. YMMV.

Thanks Michael and Don