View Full Version : Choppy result - for some time - on Bluray
Luc De Wandel January 20th, 2010, 01:39 PM I experienced something very awkward when burning edited movies from my XDCAM-HD (PDW-F350) to Bluray disk: whenever there's a panning or other motion, the first few seconds the image stutters, but after that everything moves smoothly. So there a a few seconds of choppy video, followed by perfect footage.
How is this possible? Is it a Bluray encoding artefact? (Shot in HD, 25p, edited in FCP, exported to QT in ProRes 422 and encoded that QT-movie to Bluray).
Anton Strauss January 20th, 2010, 05:37 PM what output setting do you have in the Blu-ray player setup menu?
mine can be set to 1080p or 1080i or 720p
Dave Chalmers January 21st, 2010, 02:41 AM Just a thought but if your encoding for the bluray was using too high a bitrate that might have this effect - you didn't say what SW you are using to do the encoding?
FCP7?
Something else?
Dave
Luc De Wandel January 21st, 2010, 08:57 AM Bluray was burnt with 1080, movie was inported in Toast bluray burner in Quicktime (ProRes422). Editing was done in FCP 6 - starting from original clips in XDCAM-HD, 25 p. The Quicktime movie does not suffer from this effect, only the Bluray result.
Anton Strauss January 21st, 2010, 09:42 PM did you output mpeg or H264 for the blu-ray
what max bitrate did you use for video and audio
when I use mpeg, I usually set fixed bitrate to 24000 (max at 35000 if using variable) for video and 384 for ac3 audio
Luc De Wandel January 22nd, 2010, 02:24 AM Anton, in Toast 10, there's very little I can choose as far as bitrate and burning speed are concerned. The 'burning speed' box is not even lighted up, so I cannot choose any of this. I'm using XDCAM 25 p variable bitrate to make the Quicktime movie, is that any help?
Anton Strauss January 22nd, 2010, 03:32 AM but what are you putting on the blu-ray, it can only be mpeg or h264 or some other vc1 format that nobody uses
Luc De Wandel January 22nd, 2010, 04:19 AM MPEG, I suppose, there's no choice as far as I can see. Even in the 'recorder settings' there's no menu that offers format alternatives.
Anton Strauss January 22nd, 2010, 06:53 AM sorry, but after doing lots of Blu-ray, I can assure you that there is no room for "I suppose"
a cheap encoding and authoring tool can be found at TMPGEnc - We Make Digital Video Easy! (http://tmpgenc.pegasys-inc.com/en/index.html)
Luc De Wandel January 22nd, 2010, 07:01 AM I just bought Roxio's Toast 10 + HD-Plug in for 250,- euros. Will the software you mention give me better quality and more control of the burning process on a Mac? Authoring is not so important for me, top quality image is.
Anton Strauss January 22nd, 2010, 09:45 PM ouch, don't think there is a Mac version
Gary Nattrass January 23rd, 2010, 04:02 AM Dont know if its relevant but in all my IPTV tests I have had a lot of problems using long gop material for transcoding to web and DVD, dont know about blu ray but for a lot of my tests I had to transcode to flash to stabilise the stream.
Now I am on panasonic P2 with intra frame codecs it never happens anymore.
Luc De Wandel January 23rd, 2010, 04:07 AM Anton, I talked to somenone yesterday who has some experience with Bluray, and he told me that this is a typical bluray problem. The very first frames of any new movement (pan, tilt, zoom) are choppy, then the movement smoothens. That's exactly what I'm experiencing. Have you experienced this too? I cannot imagine all bluray-users accepting this as 'normal'.
Any other suggestions?
Gary, Thanks for the info. The strange thing is that 90% of the movement is OK and smooth. It only stutters just in the very beginning. I know the problem you describe, but that represents itself al along the movie when there's a pan or a tilt, not just for a few seconds at the start of every fresh movement. Most of the footage looks fantastic, only when panning, zooming or tilting there is this strange 'stutter' that stabilizes immediately afterwards.
Gary Nattrass January 23rd, 2010, 04:29 AM I saw that stutter several times when I was on long gop and as you say its at the start, it was almost like some form of encoding buffer was trying to catch up and re-sync the frames.
Making material progressive seemed to improve it but I had lots of hours spent with problems uploading material that had been re-compressed for delivery.
As said I dont have those problems now so whether the 35mbs long gop codecs dont like re-compressing or not I dont know.
Luc De Wandel January 23rd, 2010, 04:45 AM That indeed sounds like the same problem, Gary. I'm always using progressive mode, so it's not awful, just a little disturbing (and distracting). Did you eventually find a solution to get rid of it?
I also posted this on the Bluray authoring forum a week ago, but all I got was only 48 readers, no repliers...
Gary Nattrass January 23rd, 2010, 05:14 AM It seemed to be better if I edited it native codec but then exported a master from FCP as pro res 422. I did still seem to get some problems when uploading for IPTV at 1.5mbs but the only way to stabilise it all together was to transcode to flash for upload but this took a long time and the quality was not as good.
That is why I went onto P2 as it has a higher original bit rate and just seems to be more stable once it has gone through all the compression processes.
OK most of this was all tested with HDV not Xdcam but it seemed to be related to re-compressing long gop material, as I said it doesnt seem to happen now I am on P2.
Sorry didnt see your post in the blu-ray section as I dont tend to use that format very much, most of my delivery is H264 mpeg4 to computers and clients find it just as easy to have their material on a laptop in HD or DVD for SD, the quality from P2 is very good on both.
Luc De Wandel January 23rd, 2010, 05:28 AM Thanks, Gary. I'm also editing in native XDCAM 35 mbit vb - 25p, and then exporting to QT in ProRes422. The QT-movie doesn't have the problem, so it must be happening in the transcoding to Bluray. And as I'm a complete newbie in Bluray authoring, I have no idea how to influence that last transcoding process. There's even no choice of different codecs for Bluray in Toast 10, as far as I can see.
That's why I hoped someone with a lot of Bluray experience would read my post in the Bluray section. But no luck so far...
Anton Strauss January 23rd, 2010, 09:41 PM Anton, I talked to somenone yesterday who has some experience with Bluray, and he told me that this is a typical bluray problem. The very first frames of any new movement (pan, tilt, zoom) are choppy, then the movement smoothens. That's exactly what I'm experiencing. Have you experienced this too? I cannot imagine all bluray-users accepting this as 'normal'.
Any other suggestions?
Gary, Thanks for the info. The strange thing is that 90% of the movement is OK and smooth. It only stutters just in the very beginning. I know the problem you describe, but that represents itself al along the movie when there's a pan or a tilt, not just for a few seconds at the start of every fresh movement. Most of the footage looks fantastic, only when panning, zooming or tilting there is this strange 'stutter' that stabilizes immediately afterwards.
I don't see this problem at all, I shoot, edit and encode interlaced
here is another thing that could cause your problem
the menu settings must match the movie settings
if the movie is progressive, the menu needs to be rendered progressive
if the menu is rendered interlaced and you push a button to start play, the video will stutter for a second or two while the changeover from interlace to progressive takes place
I use DVDit Pro HD for Blu-ray authoring and I can set my menu to match the movie, the frame rate must also match or you get the same stutter
http://www.videoproductions.com.au/edius5/DVDit-menu-framerate.avi
or does your stutter happen while just watching the movie and a pan or zoom starts in the video, in that case I have no clue because I don't get these problems using interlaced
do you see these stutters when watching hollywood blu-ray releases that are progressive
also, are you watching on a true progressive display? Plasma? LCD?
is the display native 1920x1080?
Luc De Wandel January 24th, 2010, 02:52 AM Hi Anton,
Yep, that's the problem: the stutter happens only while watching the movie and a pan or zoom starts in the video - or an object starts moving fast. Only a second or so, then it goes on smoothly. That's what makes it so awkward.
It's on a full-HD LCD tv from Loewe, native 1920 x 1080 and true progressive.
Someone suggested it might be the bluray player that cannot keep up with the sudden peak in bitrate when an important (datawise) movement starts. I'm going to try and find another player to compare.
Anton Strauss January 24th, 2010, 07:45 PM can you shoot and upload a clip around 5 sec long with a pan in it
I will then use my software to make a Progressive BD-R and test and I will upload the BDMV and Certificate folder so you can burn and test, if it still stutters, then the problem must be the player
Luc De Wandel January 25th, 2010, 06:02 AM OK, thanks for the help Anton. I tried to upload the clip in QT, Prores422, 25p., which is exactly 47 MB big, but I got this error message from DVInfo: "Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 134217728 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 46976178 bytes) in /export/sites/dvinfo.net/docs/forum/includes/class_core.php on line 1930".
Don't know what happened, I'll try again later.
Luc De Wandel January 25th, 2010, 06:26 AM Second try, got this message again: "Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 134217728 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 46976178 bytes) in /export/sites/dvinfo.net/docs/forum/includes/class_core.php on line 1930". Looks like there are some MB's in the allocation site already. No idea how these got there.
I guess I won't be able to send it this way. I can try via e-mail and Yousendit if that's OK for you. Let me know.
Anton Strauss January 25th, 2010, 07:40 PM can you upload to some file sharing site or your own hosting provider may have an option?
Luc De Wandel January 26th, 2010, 02:50 AM Sent you the file by FTP, Anton. Thanks.
My provider doesn't offer this possibility, but perhaps you could send it back using Yousendit?
Anton Strauss January 26th, 2010, 05:44 PM I had a look at your clip
it was shot progressive at 25fps and as a result, what you are seeing is normal, your zoom and pan are way too fast for progressive shooting
if I shoot the same interlaced, it will be much smoother because there are 50 images per second instead of only 25
however, I believe you can improve things by finding a suitable shutter speed in your camera, I have not tested this but others may be able to advice you on the best shutter setting
Luc De Wandel January 27th, 2010, 03:36 AM Hi Anton,
thanks for the comment. I did some tests with fast pans in interlaced yesterday and there everything stays perfectly smooth, as you point out. The pan-speed is indeed too fast for progressive. But I keep finding it strange that, once burnt to Bluray, the resulting video only stutters the very first second and then continues in the same smooth way as if it were interlaced. That's what confused me.
Anton Strauss January 27th, 2010, 03:59 AM try various shutter speeds with progressive
I may try that later myself
btw, I did not even need to burn it, it already acts as you describe while playing in Edius with HD monitor connected
Luc De Wandel January 27th, 2010, 06:26 AM I carefully compared the QT movie to the burnt sequence on Bluray, and the stutter that you see throughout the whole QT clip is gone in the Bluray, except for the first second. So there must be some correction in the encoding to Bluray that stabilises the image, after missing the start.
That's what makes it disturbing, because it doesn't look natural. It stutters and then takes off to a normal, smooth pan. In QT it stutters all the time, which is less disturbing IMHO. Anyway, after doing the test with both, I like interlaced better. Just wonder if there are any disadvantages in using interlaced, as I see so many people sticking to progressive only. Or is it just a matter of taste: filmic look against video-ENG look?
Anton Strauss January 27th, 2010, 06:32 AM if you plan to shoot in order to output to film, I would use progressive
for all TV work, I use interlaced, until someone can prove me wrong :)
also, if you go to the cinema and you see a pan that is too fast, you will get an instant headache and it looks like what you are seeing on blu-ray
Luc De Wandel January 27th, 2010, 07:44 AM Thanks for the advice, Anton. As I'm only a hobbyist in video, I'll probably stick to showing my movies at home and in the video club. In the first case I watch them on a full-HD LCD-screen and in the second a HD-beamer does the (marvellous) job. So it's going to be interlaced most of the time, I suppose.
|
|