Ken Diewert
January 19th, 2010, 12:37 AM
I know that there has been a lot of talk about the relative merits of attending Bridal shows and I just wanted to report on the show I attended this past weekend.
I was at the same show last year and the difference in brides attitudes towards my work and the subject in general were very tangible. Brides actually stopped by because they are seriously looking at video, which was a real switch from the previous year. This particular show cost about $600, for a table for a 1-day show that really only runs 6 hours. The brides and their guests also pay $10.00 each admission to get in. The show is one of a few good ones in a city of about 350,000 people.
I used a 40" Samsung LCD as a monitor and ran .avi off of my desktop system. It looked real sharp and I must say there was a lot of attention on the 5d2 footage - with many comments about how they didn't think that wedding videos were like that. I've only started taking wedding videos seriously for the last year and a half, so I'm still building my portfolio.
One notable thing was that there were at least 8 photogs at the show and only one only videog. Several of the brides mentioned that the sample from the other videog was like watching a home movie. I was swamped pretty much all day and didn't get a chance to check it out.
I fully expect to get at least 4-6 bookings from the show, and the exposure is great.
Anyways, I snapped off a timelapse using the 5D2 that shot about 3600 stills. It's the first timelapse I've shot, but I just picked up a lightly used 20d and a remote timer, so I'm going to shoot some more.
YouTube - Bridal Exhibition Timelapse.mp4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3I0Gtqe7iKQ)
I was at the same show last year and the difference in brides attitudes towards my work and the subject in general were very tangible. Brides actually stopped by because they are seriously looking at video, which was a real switch from the previous year. This particular show cost about $600, for a table for a 1-day show that really only runs 6 hours. The brides and their guests also pay $10.00 each admission to get in. The show is one of a few good ones in a city of about 350,000 people.
I used a 40" Samsung LCD as a monitor and ran .avi off of my desktop system. It looked real sharp and I must say there was a lot of attention on the 5d2 footage - with many comments about how they didn't think that wedding videos were like that. I've only started taking wedding videos seriously for the last year and a half, so I'm still building my portfolio.
One notable thing was that there were at least 8 photogs at the show and only one only videog. Several of the brides mentioned that the sample from the other videog was like watching a home movie. I was swamped pretty much all day and didn't get a chance to check it out.
I fully expect to get at least 4-6 bookings from the show, and the exposure is great.
Anyways, I snapped off a timelapse using the 5D2 that shot about 3600 stills. It's the first timelapse I've shot, but I just picked up a lightly used 20d and a remote timer, so I'm going to shoot some more.
YouTube - Bridal Exhibition Timelapse.mp4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3I0Gtqe7iKQ)