Bob Richardson
December 27th, 2009, 04:44 PM
The subject line basically says it all, but here's some background as to why I'm asking:
For professional video work, I already have and utilize a JVC GY-HM700 with a Fujinon 17x5 lens.
For web design work which requires occasional utility still photography, I have a Canon Powershot S5 IS (which is NOT an SLR) and a 430 EX II flash unit. This works just fine for what I do, as I do not currently bill myself as a pro photographer. Mainly it's used for shooting building exteriors, getting head shots of employees, the occasional web product shot.
In the long run, I'd very much like to have a Canon 5D Mk II (or whatever its incarnation is by the time I can afford it), but I just can't justify the expense right now. Not even the expense of a 7D. I think these cameras would be a great deal of fun to have, and would also allow for a different style of video production than the JVC, especially in terms of making "cinema-style" productions with a shallow DOF, etc.
Here's the dilemma: My partner is back in school finishing his degree, and he's taking a photography class to fulfill an art requirement. This class basically requires an SLR (or a micro-four-thirds with the appropriate manual controls.)
I already have some Canon gear, such as the flash unit, so it makes sense to stick with Canon.
We could just get a Rebel XS or Rebel Xsi and have a very nice basic SLR, and maybe start collecting decent used prime lenses for future attachment to a 5D. Right now we can get into an XS with kit lens for $450.
But Canon also makes a T1i which offers video. The 1080p mode seems useless at 20fps, but the 720p mode appears to do 30p in H264. There is no external mic input, but I can record audio to another device if doing something serious.
So, _can_ you do something serious with the T1i, or are its features just too darned crippled, or is the video over-compressed, etc? I could see justifying it as a 2nd camera with the JVC, even though I'm sure the images will be quite different, but when nothing else is available it could do for a roving hand-held with the JVC does the primary shots.
It looks like the T1i is at least $300 more, depending on kit options, than the XS.
Is it worth it? Or is the video mode so frustrating/underpowered for aux. pro use that it will never be worth the trouble? (And it just puts me $300 further away from ever getting a 5D or 7D)
(I realize the T1i is also 15 megapixels vs. 10 or 12, but I don't think we'll be needing that, and in reviews I've read those megapixels don't seem to make any appreciable difference using the entry-level lenses.)
Thanks in advance for any advice.
For professional video work, I already have and utilize a JVC GY-HM700 with a Fujinon 17x5 lens.
For web design work which requires occasional utility still photography, I have a Canon Powershot S5 IS (which is NOT an SLR) and a 430 EX II flash unit. This works just fine for what I do, as I do not currently bill myself as a pro photographer. Mainly it's used for shooting building exteriors, getting head shots of employees, the occasional web product shot.
In the long run, I'd very much like to have a Canon 5D Mk II (or whatever its incarnation is by the time I can afford it), but I just can't justify the expense right now. Not even the expense of a 7D. I think these cameras would be a great deal of fun to have, and would also allow for a different style of video production than the JVC, especially in terms of making "cinema-style" productions with a shallow DOF, etc.
Here's the dilemma: My partner is back in school finishing his degree, and he's taking a photography class to fulfill an art requirement. This class basically requires an SLR (or a micro-four-thirds with the appropriate manual controls.)
I already have some Canon gear, such as the flash unit, so it makes sense to stick with Canon.
We could just get a Rebel XS or Rebel Xsi and have a very nice basic SLR, and maybe start collecting decent used prime lenses for future attachment to a 5D. Right now we can get into an XS with kit lens for $450.
But Canon also makes a T1i which offers video. The 1080p mode seems useless at 20fps, but the 720p mode appears to do 30p in H264. There is no external mic input, but I can record audio to another device if doing something serious.
So, _can_ you do something serious with the T1i, or are its features just too darned crippled, or is the video over-compressed, etc? I could see justifying it as a 2nd camera with the JVC, even though I'm sure the images will be quite different, but when nothing else is available it could do for a roving hand-held with the JVC does the primary shots.
It looks like the T1i is at least $300 more, depending on kit options, than the XS.
Is it worth it? Or is the video mode so frustrating/underpowered for aux. pro use that it will never be worth the trouble? (And it just puts me $300 further away from ever getting a 5D or 7D)
(I realize the T1i is also 15 megapixels vs. 10 or 12, but I don't think we'll be needing that, and in reviews I've read those megapixels don't seem to make any appreciable difference using the entry-level lenses.)
Thanks in advance for any advice.