Adam Larratt
June 7th, 2005, 04:49 PM
I myself am a consumer... Currently use a first gen Sony D8 and am fairly unhappy with low light quality... Very blocky...
I just came into the money needed to buy a new camcorder. Was just about to buy the Sony DCR-HC90 because of its overall quality, and because of claims of it being very good in low light conditions (which is where most of my video is shot). This was primarily in comparison to the the 3 cmos camera dcr-pc1000... Then I came acrodd the HDR-HC1 and had to take a step back... This looks like the camera to have, and it is still just barely within my budget. But is it truly the better choice over the HC90?
Now my question is very simple... Color aside... Manual controls aside... Features aside... (Because the HC1 already impresses me more so than the HC90 based on its additional controls and features, and the HD increased resolution)...... My question is which is going to put out a better quality video in low light conditions... Better quality as in better color but most importantly least blocky-ness and digital artifacts? Because I would choose the HC90 above the HC1 100% if it performs better in low light DESPITE the fact that I find a number of its features to be desirable and superior to the HC90... Price is no matter other than that the HC1 is definitely the absolute most I could spend on a camcorder. If it performs better in low light it is worth the extra $1000 (CAD) to me... But if it doesnt, the added features and resolution are not worth anything to me over the DCR-HC90.
Thank you.
I just came into the money needed to buy a new camcorder. Was just about to buy the Sony DCR-HC90 because of its overall quality, and because of claims of it being very good in low light conditions (which is where most of my video is shot). This was primarily in comparison to the the 3 cmos camera dcr-pc1000... Then I came acrodd the HDR-HC1 and had to take a step back... This looks like the camera to have, and it is still just barely within my budget. But is it truly the better choice over the HC90?
Now my question is very simple... Color aside... Manual controls aside... Features aside... (Because the HC1 already impresses me more so than the HC90 based on its additional controls and features, and the HD increased resolution)...... My question is which is going to put out a better quality video in low light conditions... Better quality as in better color but most importantly least blocky-ness and digital artifacts? Because I would choose the HC90 above the HC1 100% if it performs better in low light DESPITE the fact that I find a number of its features to be desirable and superior to the HC90... Price is no matter other than that the HC1 is definitely the absolute most I could spend on a camcorder. If it performs better in low light it is worth the extra $1000 (CAD) to me... But if it doesnt, the added features and resolution are not worth anything to me over the DCR-HC90.
Thank you.