Dan Davis
February 13th, 2005, 09:47 AM
This is a terrific site, thanks Chris and all who contribute! There are several threads that discuss picture quality. Most seem to stress two attributes: low light and moviesness.
My background is in 35mm now digital still photography both professionally and artistic for personal expression. It leads me to ask questions in other areas. Would someone (or anyone) take on the challenge of discussing the VX2100/DP170 versus the GL2 in the following areas?
1. Even the most expensive lenses with only 2.5:1 up to 4:1 zoom ratios display pin cushioning and/or barrel distortion at their extremes. At 12:1 and 20:1 both must exist in these cameras pictures. Which one is least affected?
2. Contrast. Which one is better in bright light, high contrast situations?
3. Detail and fine lines; how well do they perform?
4. DOF
5. At its most basic level, a camcorder is a rapid-fire still camera. At the highest level would seem to be the ability to capture and reassemble (playback) the most lifelike, as opposed to movie-like pictures. Which of them is most lifelike?
My background is in 35mm now digital still photography both professionally and artistic for personal expression. It leads me to ask questions in other areas. Would someone (or anyone) take on the challenge of discussing the VX2100/DP170 versus the GL2 in the following areas?
1. Even the most expensive lenses with only 2.5:1 up to 4:1 zoom ratios display pin cushioning and/or barrel distortion at their extremes. At 12:1 and 20:1 both must exist in these cameras pictures. Which one is least affected?
2. Contrast. Which one is better in bright light, high contrast situations?
3. Detail and fine lines; how well do they perform?
4. DOF
5. At its most basic level, a camcorder is a rapid-fire still camera. At the highest level would seem to be the ability to capture and reassemble (playback) the most lifelike, as opposed to movie-like pictures. Which of them is most lifelike?