Christopher Harring
January 13th, 2005, 01:50 PM
i searched the archives for some unified information, but didn't really have much luck for this specific subject. i feel like i predicate ever post i make with the same line, and here it goes again: my background is in film. even if i'm shooting a midnite scene, my instinct tells me to generate a good deal of light. but there seem to be a couple of catches:
1. i asked about the iso of digital video cameras a while back, and the consensus was that, although difficult and pointless to compute, the figures are high (c. 800, and varying wildly). so whatever the exact figure, video is akin to fast film.
2. i recently lit a night scene for a short i was working on: i set up various background lights, a soft china lantern fill and a lamp pointed at a nearby white wall for key light. then, to bring the light up a little bit (i don't really like shooting wide open, another lingering film instinct), i threw some soft, reflected ambient light up at the ceiling from well behind the camera. the director (who knows nothing of dv and simply wants every scene to look like his eye believes it should) told me i had lit the scene way to bright, pulled my ambient light, and we went ahead and shot the scene. in the end, it actually looked relatively great.
so my question: does dv require a completely different lighting approach than film? should i put the big lights away and build kits with fluoros and 200W bulbs? if i'm standing in the middle of a room with a light meter that's reading .02 lumens, but it looks ok in the camera, should i just start rolling?
in the end, i'm sick of lighting things as i would for film, then having to disassemble my rig piece by piece to bring the light back to a usable level. throw some links, tips or book title at me, and i'd be glad to do some more research. thanks!
1. i asked about the iso of digital video cameras a while back, and the consensus was that, although difficult and pointless to compute, the figures are high (c. 800, and varying wildly). so whatever the exact figure, video is akin to fast film.
2. i recently lit a night scene for a short i was working on: i set up various background lights, a soft china lantern fill and a lamp pointed at a nearby white wall for key light. then, to bring the light up a little bit (i don't really like shooting wide open, another lingering film instinct), i threw some soft, reflected ambient light up at the ceiling from well behind the camera. the director (who knows nothing of dv and simply wants every scene to look like his eye believes it should) told me i had lit the scene way to bright, pulled my ambient light, and we went ahead and shot the scene. in the end, it actually looked relatively great.
so my question: does dv require a completely different lighting approach than film? should i put the big lights away and build kits with fluoros and 200W bulbs? if i'm standing in the middle of a room with a light meter that's reading .02 lumens, but it looks ok in the camera, should i just start rolling?
in the end, i'm sick of lighting things as i would for film, then having to disassemble my rig piece by piece to bring the light back to a usable level. throw some links, tips or book title at me, and i'd be glad to do some more research. thanks!