View Full Version : Pre-Amps, Mixers and One Slow Learner
Barry Rivadue September 3rd, 2004, 02:47 PM With digital I tend to learn things butt-backwards, and my latest question has to do with pre-amps and mixers, terms I've repeatedly read about but did nothing about, until now. I have a Shure SM58 mic, a DVX100 and a computer with a Sound Blaster card. Now, here are some very elementary questions:
* Explain the function of a pre-amp and/or mixer
in regard to a dynamic microphone, and/or
input from a DVX100.
* What are some recommended pre-amps under $200?
* What is this "insert" feature mentioned in some
pre-amp specs?
* How do these devices work with a computer and, say,
Vegas?
Thanks for any info!
Jay Massengill September 3rd, 2004, 04:18 PM A preamp circuit is required to raise the very small mic-level signals up to line-level. Mixers with mic inputs have a preamp circuit built in to each of those inputs.
A standalone preamp has one, two or eight inputs and performs the same function as a mixer preamp, but without the other routing, mixing and control features. A preamp will also supply phantom power for those mics that need it. Your dynamic mic doesn't need phantom, but it does need a good preamp to cleanly raise its level since that mic has a very low sensitivity.
There are several ways to look at "best". Do you mean most practical or best sounding? A small mixer with good preamps will be the most practical, but good small mixers like Mackie tend to be over $200 except for their lowest models.
There are lots of musician oriented standalone preamps available for that price.
An insert jack allows you to send the preamped signal out to an additional device, like a compressor for example, and then return the signal to the original device for further routing, mixing, processing... On Mackie mixers this jack also allows you to send a copy of the preamped signal somewhere else without interrupting the signal flow through the original device.
Using one of these devices with a computer and software such as Vegas allows you much greater control and higher sound quality than sending the mic directly into your computer sound card. Unless your sound card or audio interface is a high-end unit that has good preamps already built in.
Bryan Beasleigh September 3rd, 2004, 04:48 PM You have an excellent preamp built into your DVX100.
Here's some reading for this evening
Location Sound by Dan Brockett (http://www.kenstone.net/fcp_homepage/location_sound.html#link%20two)
A whole herd of articles covering every aspect of production sound (http://www.equipmentemporium.com/articles.htm)
There will be a test ;-)
Barry Rivadue September 3rd, 2004, 04:58 PM Wow, thanks so far, everyone.
I figured the DVX100 was okay on this. My Shure SM58 I suppose would then need a preamp; all this is primarily for a studio setup, and not for location.
Mike Rehmus September 3rd, 2004, 07:08 PM <<<-- Originally posted by Barry Rivadue : With digital I tend to learn things butt-backwards, and my latest question has to do with pre-amps and mixers, terms I've repeatedly read about but did nothing about, until now. I have a Shure SM58 mic, a DVX100 and a computer with a Sound Blaster card. Now, here are some very elementary questions:
* Explain the function of a pre-amp and/or mixer
in regard to a dynamic microphone, and/or
input from a DVX100.
You don't need anything but an XLR cable to enjoy quite good sound out of the SM58 and the camera.
I' don't have answers for the two snipped questions.
* How do these devices work with a computer and, say,
Vegas?
If you capture audio from the microphone via your camcorder, then your sound card does not enter into the capture equation at all. And if you master back out to DV, or DVD, it doesn't play any role either (other that allowing you to listen to the audio). This is true for most NLE setups I know of.
If you go out to an analog video recording setup you either have built-in analog out from your NLE or you have an outboard DV to analog converter so the sound card is avoided.
You can run your audio throught something like Sound Forge without any degredation by the sound card. It only operates as an audio output device and is not in the audio computational chain.
Note that the Sound Blaster, like most other consumer sound cards, will work OK until you want pristine silence during quiet periods and want to be able to hear the very good results from your sound editing.
As soon as you want to capture audio directly into your computer then the sound card will play a significant role in the quality of the audio you capture.
Thanks for any info! -->>>
Barry Rivadue September 3rd, 2004, 07:15 PM All this certainly clarifies things; thanks.
Aaron Koolen September 3rd, 2004, 09:15 PM Beas. That Location Sound link is fabulous!
Cheers
Aaron
Robert J. Wolff September 4th, 2004, 02:21 PM Jay,
I'm stuck in a position of using an RF system, vs., an on board mike, for wild life. The Mackie pre amp compact field mixer, seems to me to be my best bet, for @ 8 c notes. I think after examination of the size and weight, the portablitlity of the unit makes it worth my investment.
Do you or any one else have a better idea? I don't suppose that there is all of that much difference when using RF in the field, far away from spurious signals???
Bryan Beasleigh September 4th, 2004, 03:32 PM "The Mackie pre amp compact field mixer:
I can't find any reference to a field mixer on the mackie site.
Most of what they make is far too fiddly and requires 120 volt input. A field mixer is sturdy, battery powered and has the absolute minimum of control. There aren't dozens of pots and sliders to confuse the issue. The maxhies and behringers look to me, something like what Red Green's nephew carries.
Jay Massengill September 4th, 2004, 03:36 PM I'm not aware of that Mackie either. Can you give us some more details on what you're looking at?
Mike Rehmus September 4th, 2004, 11:29 PM You do have to take some care with RF and portable mixers. Some of them have some problems with RF leakage causing internal noise .
My Shure FP32 will do very wierd things if I plug into its output with a Sennheiser plug-on transmitter. I've heard that a blocking or maybe filter cap needs to be added to between the mixer and the transmitter.
Robert J. Wolff September 5th, 2004, 03:50 AM OOPS!! Copied from wrong site! It is a Sound Device item. Sorry.
Below is the one I have been looking at for field use. Any thoughts?
Suggested Retail: $855 USD
MixPre Features
Dynamic range exceeding 110 dB
10 Hz to 50 kHz audio bandwidth
Maximum of 66 dB of gain per input
Premium Lundahl input transformers
Discrete 6-transistor balanced output drivers
Sealed, conductive plastic potentiometers
Seven-segment, sunlight-readable GaN LED meters
Phantom power, 48 volts or 15 volts
High-pass filters @ 80 or 160 Hz, 6 dB per octave
Inputs hard panned to left, center, or right outputs
High-power headphone monitoring
"Unclippable" input peak limiters via two-stage opto-isolator circuit with adjustable limiter threshold (per input)
Dual mono or linked stereo limiter operation
Two internal AA batteries
External 5 to 17 VDC powering
Power LED indicates low battery power
RF filtering on all inputs and outputs. Free from "Pin 1" grounding problems
High-strength, extruded aluminum chassis with protective metal end panels
All-metal connectors solidly connected to chassis
MixPre— left view
MixPre— right view
_
The MixPre from Sound Devices is a studio-quality two-channel, portable, stereo microphone mixer. Its impressive audio performance and comprehensive features, including pan switches, built-in slate microphone, 1 kHz tone oscillator, and headphone monitoring, make it ideal for the front end of any studio or field production system.
Radio, television, and film production engineers value the compact size and ability to withstand extremes in the field. The MixPre combines rugged mechanical and electrical construction, compact size, and high-quality components. The MixPre gives no-compromise performance for any application.
User Guide (276k, English)
User Guide (198k, Spanish)
Fact Sheet (352k)
MixPre Circuitry (100k photo)
360° View (requires Flash 5+)
Specifications
Gain:
(s/n 0503_ or greater), Mic Input to Output, per channel, continuously variable
Output
Gain Range
LINE
off — 66 dB
TAPE
off — 56 dB
Equivalent Input Noise:
-126 dBu (-128 dBV) maximum (150 ohm source, flat weighting, 22 - 22 kHz bandwidth, gain control set at 50% or higher, phantom power off)
Output Clipping Level (Line):
+22 dBu minimum with 100k ohm load, +20 dBu minimum with 600 ohm load
Dynamic Range:
110 dB minimum
THD + Noise:
0.05% maximum (from 60 Hz to 22 kHz @ +4 dBu output level, 22 Hz - 22 kHz filter bandwidth, gain control at 50%, phantom off)
Inputs:
Transformer-balanced, 2k ohm input impedance
Outputs (XLR):
s/n < 0507 - impedance-balanced, 120 ohm output impedance,
s/n >0507 - active-balanced, 120 ohm output impedance
Outputs (Tape):
Unbalanced, tip-left, ring-right, sleeve-ground, 2.4k ohm output impedance
Power (Internal):
2 AA alkaline batteries, 6 hours life typical with +4 dBu signal into 600 ohms, no phantom power
Power (External):
5 - 18 VDC via 4-pin Hirose connector (pin-4 positive, pin-1 negative), voltages above 14 VDC cause no damage to unit, but will open an internal poly fuse. Poly fuse will reset when voltage is removed.
Power LED:
Green indicates power and good battery. Red indicates power and low battery. LED turns red when approximately 1 hour of battery life remain (with phantom power off). Green with external DC power.
Frequency Response:
20 Hz - 30 kHz, +0.1, -0.5 dB; -1 dB at 5 Hz & 50 kHz (relative to 1 kHz with 150 ohm source, gain controls set at 50%)
Input Clipping Level:
-10 dBu minimum
Output Clipping Level (Tape):
+11 dBu (2.75 V RMS) minimum with 100k ohm load
Common Mode Rejection Ratio:
100 dB minimum at 80 Hz, 60 dB minimum at 10 kHz
Channel Separation:
Greater than 80 dB at 1 kHz (gain controls set to 50%)
High-Pass Filters:
80 Hz or 160 Hz (switch selectable), 6 dB per octave
Phantom Power:
48 V through 6.8k resistors or 15 V through 680 ohm resistors (switch selectable)
Limiter:
Thresholds adjustable per channel from -10 dBu to +18 dBu, 10:1 limiting ratio, 5 mS attack time, 100 mS release time, Amber/Red LED indicates limiting/clipping, Dual mono or stereo linked
Internal Voltage Rails:
±15 V, regulated
Polarity:
All inputs to all outputs, non-inverting. Pin-2 of XLRs "hot" to unbalanced inputs and outputs.
Metering:
Seven segment GaN (Gallium Nitride) LED meter with three intensities, peak responding
Operating Temperature Range:
0 to 70 degrees C, 32 to 160 degrees F
Dimensions:
43 mm x 94 mm x 140 mm (h x w x d), (1.7" x 3.7" x 5.5")
Weight (unit only):
0.8 kg, 2.0 lbs.
Weight (packaged):
1.2 kg, 3.0 lbs.
Certifications:
meets FCC Part 15 Class B, eligible to bear CE mark
© 1999 – 2004, Sound Devices LLC All rights reserved. Privacy statement.
Bryan Beasleigh September 5th, 2004, 08:37 AM The Mix Pre is one of the better choices and is well known to this forum. It is also marketed by Shure as an FP24. I own a Mix Pre as well as a Sound Devices 302.
Aaron Koolen September 5th, 2004, 02:23 PM Bryan will be able to confirm this, but my understanding is that the mixpre does not accept line level inputs. That's fine as it's meant to be a mic preamp anyway, but if you're looking to use it with a feed from a desk or some other line level source, you'll need a pad. That's why I'd prefer something like the 302 - but yes it's WAY more expensive.
Bryan, is this true?
Aaron
Oleg Kaizerman September 5th, 2004, 03:29 PM thats corect , sd skipped the line input and mike outs as well
no stereo support (ms decoding)
individual chanel monitoring is also missing .
good preamps ,10db att when you work with condenser and that might be not enouth when you pullthe signal all way up with low output mikes ( i dont sure if that was changed in the last models), no t (tonador)powerimg
weri limiting mixer -exelent expander for 302 or 442
the 302 is the way to go if you planning to do with more then 1 mike
Bryan Beasleigh September 5th, 2004, 05:10 PM I agree with Oleg
Oleg Kaizerman September 5th, 2004, 05:33 PM you dont have to:-)
Jay Massengill September 5th, 2004, 06:18 PM I think the PSC DV ProMix3 is the lowest cost good field mixer that has switchable inputs and outputs. I haven't used one yet and it lacks some of the other features of the MixPre.
Bryan Beasleigh September 5th, 2004, 08:16 PM <<<-- Originally posted by Oleg Kaizerman : you dont have to:-) -->>>
I know ;-)```````
The mix pre is very compact and built like a brick outhouse. Unless you get really fancy it will perform most basic functions and at half the price of the 302. Click here for Mix Pre (http://www.sounddevices.com/products/mx2master.htm)
If you can afford it the 302 has so much more. All of the functions are software selectable. The mix pre can be linked to the 302 or the 442. 302 Review (http://www.sounddevices.com/download/dv-magazine-302-12-03.pdf)
The PSC unit is a fair bit larger than the Mix pre, has 3 inputs that are switchable between line and mic level. It doesn't seem to have mid , side decoding Cost is $495 Click here for promix 3 (http://www.professionalsound.com/catalog/DV%20Promix.htm)
Aaron Koolen September 6th, 2004, 01:02 AM Read the review here (http://dv.com/reviews/reviews_item.jhtml?category=Hardware&articleId=20900623&_requestid=348223), but one of the things noted of the Promix 3 is it's strange selection of output levels. Mic level output is -50dbV and line level is 0dbU. Normally pro line is +4dbU and mic level would be better at -35dbV.
Aaron
Robert J. Wolff September 6th, 2004, 02:05 AM Much thanks to one and all.
Do to it's weight and size, it's the premix, (alias Shure FP24), for me for the field work that I am doing.
Jay Massengill September 6th, 2004, 09:04 AM Those output levels for the ProMix3 would however make it perfect for the Panasonic DVX-100A. That's exactly the levels it's looking for.
Aaron Koolen September 6th, 2004, 06:22 PM Jay, that's quite funny. I went and looked up the manual on the DVX and you're right - that's good news for DVX people.
Does the DVX not have a MIC ATT option?
Aaron
Jay Massengill September 7th, 2004, 07:54 AM The DVX-100a has a menu setting for mic levels of -60db or -50db.
So it's not as wide range as the MicATT switches on Sony and Canon cameras. Of course this is kind of irrelevent since you'd use the line setting with the mixer, unless the PSC doesn't have individual switches on the outputs and you also had to feed something with no choice except mic level.
|
|