Bob Richardson
August 7th, 2009, 04:00 PM
I have a background in classical music. One thing I'd like to do more of, at least from a hobbyist perspective, is make good quality high-def recordings of concert performances ... think soloists, small groups in a non-live but field setting.
Doing this well requires a multiple microphone setup, and some kind of mixer and multi-track recorder for subsequent mixdown.
From a paid-gig perspective, it would also be handy to have such a setup to cover conferences and other small-group live events.
So I've been looking for a low cost, portable multi-track recorder which would be a good companion for my HM-700, as well as a good stand-alone device.
I think I have found such a device, but it's brand new to the market and there aren't any formal reviews yet:
Samson - Zoom - R16 (http://www.samsontech.com/products/productpage.cfm?prodID=2009)
What I really like about this one is that it records to SDHC cards -- the same cards used by the JVC cameras, as well as my Canon still camera, so I wouldn't have to invest in yet another media type.
It costs about $400, and in addition to the SDHC card feature:
* It has 8 full XLR inputs, no need for conversion plugs.
* Two of those XLR inputs have switchable +48v phantom power.
* It can run on batteries if needed.
* It's very compact -- it actually would fit in an equipment briefcase I already own.
* It can act as a control surface / input module for Logic
* It has a bit of future-proofing in that two can be daisy-chained to make a 16-channel mixer/recorder.
So, for my purposes (amateur music performance capture, pro small conference/event capture), is there any reason I should avoid this piece of gear? What's Zoom's quality (durability and audio quality) historically like? Is there something better in that price range?
Other units I have looked at share some combination of shortcomings: Few or no XLR inputs, no phantom power, something other than SDHC cards, or no battery capability.
Is this unit a game changer, or just an attempt to have an impressive spec sheet for something with is actually so cheaply made it isn't practical for serious use?
Doing this well requires a multiple microphone setup, and some kind of mixer and multi-track recorder for subsequent mixdown.
From a paid-gig perspective, it would also be handy to have such a setup to cover conferences and other small-group live events.
So I've been looking for a low cost, portable multi-track recorder which would be a good companion for my HM-700, as well as a good stand-alone device.
I think I have found such a device, but it's brand new to the market and there aren't any formal reviews yet:
Samson - Zoom - R16 (http://www.samsontech.com/products/productpage.cfm?prodID=2009)
What I really like about this one is that it records to SDHC cards -- the same cards used by the JVC cameras, as well as my Canon still camera, so I wouldn't have to invest in yet another media type.
It costs about $400, and in addition to the SDHC card feature:
* It has 8 full XLR inputs, no need for conversion plugs.
* Two of those XLR inputs have switchable +48v phantom power.
* It can run on batteries if needed.
* It's very compact -- it actually would fit in an equipment briefcase I already own.
* It can act as a control surface / input module for Logic
* It has a bit of future-proofing in that two can be daisy-chained to make a 16-channel mixer/recorder.
So, for my purposes (amateur music performance capture, pro small conference/event capture), is there any reason I should avoid this piece of gear? What's Zoom's quality (durability and audio quality) historically like? Is there something better in that price range?
Other units I have looked at share some combination of shortcomings: Few or no XLR inputs, no phantom power, something other than SDHC cards, or no battery capability.
Is this unit a game changer, or just an attempt to have an impressive spec sheet for something with is actually so cheaply made it isn't practical for serious use?