Bob Andren
April 21st, 2004, 10:13 PM
Hi. Although I'm halfway through shooting my first feature with the XL1 stock lens, until I make that huge million dollar deal at Sundance my bread and butter is shooting weddings.
My main employer has become dissatisfied with the image of the XL1, having seen footage shot with cameras such as the DSR300, 500, 570 etc. Not wanting to give up my XL1, I told him I would get a better lens for it. So:
1) will the 16 or 14 manual lens give a noticeable superior image to the stock lens?
2) for someone like myself who is shooting weddings, shooting on the fly, no second takes usually and who has to zoom a lot to grab the shot, is it really feasible to get one of these manual lenses or will it slow me down?
3) from what I've read in the past, the 14 lens has no servo zoom capability, correct? while the 16 lens does? if so, I would lean toward the 16 then but-
4) is the 16 lens significantly heavier than the stock lens? I shoot handheld with a monopod, no tripod, with the monopod
retracted so I use it more as a steady stick.
5) I understand with both I lose the image stablization feature, so given that and the heavier weight of the 16 lens, is this going to make shooting significantly more difficult, giving I'm handheld, aided by my monopod steady stick?
6)any wedding/event videographers out there using the XL1, with one of these manual lenses, who has any advice/comments?
or anyone else for that matter, just general comments on my situtation?
Finally, anyone know where I could get a 16 lens under a thousand?
thanks,
Bob
My main employer has become dissatisfied with the image of the XL1, having seen footage shot with cameras such as the DSR300, 500, 570 etc. Not wanting to give up my XL1, I told him I would get a better lens for it. So:
1) will the 16 or 14 manual lens give a noticeable superior image to the stock lens?
2) for someone like myself who is shooting weddings, shooting on the fly, no second takes usually and who has to zoom a lot to grab the shot, is it really feasible to get one of these manual lenses or will it slow me down?
3) from what I've read in the past, the 14 lens has no servo zoom capability, correct? while the 16 lens does? if so, I would lean toward the 16 then but-
4) is the 16 lens significantly heavier than the stock lens? I shoot handheld with a monopod, no tripod, with the monopod
retracted so I use it more as a steady stick.
5) I understand with both I lose the image stablization feature, so given that and the heavier weight of the 16 lens, is this going to make shooting significantly more difficult, giving I'm handheld, aided by my monopod steady stick?
6)any wedding/event videographers out there using the XL1, with one of these manual lenses, who has any advice/comments?
or anyone else for that matter, just general comments on my situtation?
Finally, anyone know where I could get a 16 lens under a thousand?
thanks,
Bob