View Full Version : best hypercardiod for indoors


Amos Kim
July 1st, 2009, 03:32 AM
I'm looking for the best hypercard to complement a rode ntg-3 for narrative work. I do have a oktava mk012 available. Anybody have other suggestions?

Steve House
July 1st, 2009, 06:14 AM
I'm looking for the best hypercard to complement a rode ntg-3 for narrative work. I do have a oktava mk012 available. Anybody have other suggestions?

Audio Technica AT4053b, AKG Blueline Series SE300/CK93 combo, AKG ULS Series C480/CK63 combo, Sennheiser MKH8050, Sanken CS-3e, and the industry standard Schoeps CMC641.

Amos Kim
July 1st, 2009, 03:42 PM
anyone know how a rode nt3 hyper compares to oktava mk012? thanks

Alex Donkle
July 1st, 2009, 03:59 PM
anyone know how a rode nt3 hyper compares to oktava mk012? thanks

I don't know about sound quality, but it's significantly heavier than the oktava and most hypers, so I wouldn't recommend it if you're booming it.

Robert Morane
July 1st, 2009, 07:04 PM
the sound is superb (NT3) and it is a bit heavy but manageable.

Michael Wisniewski
July 1st, 2009, 09:17 PM
anyone know how a rode nt3 hyper compares to oktava mk012? thanksTo my ears, the sound from the Rode NT3 hyper is much more rich and dynamic than the Oktava. Plus it's more resistant to handling noise. So personally, I'll use the Rode NT3 hyper any day over the Oktava. In fact, I'll use the NT3 over the AT4053a. The trade off is the size/weight of the NT3 hyper.

Usually, mics from the same manufacturer match better, so the NT3/NTG-3 combo might work quite well.

Ty Ford
July 3rd, 2009, 08:14 PM
the sound is superb (NT3) and it is a bit heavy but manageable.

Superb? We obviously have different different definitions of the word.

A Schoeps cmc641; that's about as superb as you get.

Regards,

Ty Ford

Dana Love
July 8th, 2009, 03:32 PM
At ten times the price, I hope the Schoeps is better than the Rode.

At half the price, the Rode produces a sound more compatible to the NTG-2 than the Oktava.