I've started testing and production on a new P3Pictures video: Canon 5D Mark II Audio Exposed.

For recorders, I'll test the 1.1.0 firmware, as well as an alpha version of Magic Lantern. I'll also compare it to the MicroTrackII, and I've put out a call for a Zoom H4n recorder in the Portland area. http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/all-things-audio/237672-zoom-h4n-portland.html

Regarding XLR inputs, I'll test the BeachTek DXA-5D and the juicedLink CX231. I'll also try the MicroTrackII (and maybe the Zoom) with a direct mic connection.

For the microphone, I'll use the Rode NT1-A for the noise tests. It's not really a video mic, but it has a self-noise of only 5 dBA, which is about as good as it gets. We will know that the noise is from the electronics, rather than the mic. I will also do a real-world test with an AT815b shotgun. I'll record dialog at a moderate distance and subtle sounds with that setup.

I'll do my best to keep everybody up to date with my progress...

Wish I could be there to see the process, Jon. Definitely keep us posted..

I've been working on calibration. I'm using a -18dB 500 Hz signal and close mic'ing the speaker. (I don't use 1kHz, because that's my crossover frequency.)

I started with the MicroTrack at 50% volume. I matched the juicedLink with MagicLantern (Hi setting, pot at 1:30.) I ran the same signal into the BeachTek and the 5D2 with standard firmware, and, surprisingly, the signal was 12 dB hotter. Being passive, I thought that it would be on the low side, but the camera gain is pretty high by default.

BTW, the pilot tone from the BeachTek seems to be just under 20kHz. And that 16 kHz rolloff I had seen from stuff on the web? That might have been due to compression pre-filtering.

One thing that will make calibration a bit tough is that the BeackTek doesn't really disable the ALC. It limits it. For most dialog, ALC should be inactive, but if you take the system to a metal concert, the ALC will come back to life. In effect, there is still an active compressor/limiter. The ALC turns down the volume quickly, but the volume increases very slowly during quiet moments.

Oh well. It's 1:13. Time to sleep on it...

I started with the MicroTrack at 50% volume. I matched the juicedLink with MagicLantern (Hi setting, pot at 1:30.) I ran the same signal into the BeachTek and the 5D2 with standard firmware, and, surprisingly, the signal was 12 dB hotter. Being passive, I thought that it would be on the low side, but the camera gain is pretty high by default.
The Canon firmware has the analog MGAIN register in the AK4646 set to +20 or +29 dB by default and the ALC was typically selecting digital gains in the +20 dB range.

One thing that will make calibration a bit tough is that the BeackTek doesn't really disable the ALC. It limits it. For most dialog, ALC should be inactive, but if you take the system to a metal concert, the ALC will come back to life. In effect, there is still an active compressor/limiter. The ALC turns down the volume quickly, but the volume increases very slowly during quiet moments.
The ALC recovery timers and rates are configurable in the IC. Since I'm just turning it off, I haven't tested any of the different values. The default appears to be increasing the gain 0.375 dB every 2.9 ms when sampling at 44.1 kHz.

Good luck with your tests today! I'm eager to hear the results.

IMHO, going through great lengths to try and capture audio on-cam may not be the best approach in terms of overall production workflow for this camera. It bulks the camera up and relies on sub-par internal audio circuitry.

Regardless I appreciate what you are doing and look forward to your results Jon.

"sub-par internal audio circuitry"

I thought the camera was CAPABLE of capturing HQ 48/16 audio. I thought that once AGC was defeated and audio level could be set manually, we'd have audio comparable to any HD camera (Uncompressed 48/16).
Is this not the case?

I thought the camera was CAPABLE of capturing HQ 48/16 audio.

The AK4646 will do 48 KHz, but it isn't clear if the DIGIC will process it at that rate. That is a good future project for the Magic Lantern firmware following the initial release.

I thought that once AGC was defeated and audio level could be set manually, we'd have audio comparable to any HD camera (Uncompressed 48/16).
Is this not the case?
It really depends on how much attention Canon paid to good analog circuitry leading from the mic input jack to the AK4646. If they have traces too close to digital circuits, or if the quality of the analog components aren't top-notch, the unbalanced signal can pick up lots of noise. Jon's tests will give us an idea of the noise floor that the camera can actually achieve.

Glenn, this is exactly what I'm trying to confirm: can the 5D2 be used to capture good, if not excellent, audio?

Anyway, here's the signal I'm using to calibrate levels (right-click and download):
http://p3pictures.com/audio_5d2/test_signals/500Hz_MultipleLevels_-18-60.wav

I'm positioning the microphone close to one woofer and muting the other speaker. I then record this into each preamp/recorder combination - without touching the mic. I adjust levels as needed to get them to record the same levels, as allowed by adjustment ranges. I'll note any differences (small differences - or large ones because of running out of adjustment range) and account for these digitally in post. That should level the playing field.

Having worked with a high frequency tone on one track, to disable AGC, I am feeling pretty good about what this set up will do. You will have to add a preamp system like with the Juiced Link CX231, but I have already seen improved capability with that set up.
With Jon testing Tramms set up, we should get a pretty good idea where its going.

All of us have different levels of need of course. Some of us will be satisfied with sound that we have been able to get into our prior DV and HDV cameras. For those looking for something more spectacular, you may be disappointed. But the initial reports I have heard from Jon, and my own testing lead me to believe we should be able to get decent in camera audio. But lets wait and see..

Here's what I have calibrated so far...

CALIBRATED

* The juicedLink CX231 into the 5D2 with Magic Lantern firmware. The juicedLink is cranked to 100% on high. Tramm's software sets the analog gain in the camera to 0dB, and pushes the digital gain by 12 dB. There will be adjustments in the future, but I have no more gain available at this time, so this set the reference levels. From experience, this is a practical real-world level, so this is reasonable.

* The BeachTek DXA-5D into the 5D2 with Magic Lantern firmware. Since the firmware is gain limited and the BeachTek is passive, the gain is ridiculously low. I boosted the signal 18dB in post. In the production firmware, the in-camera gain would be increased. This is not a real-world scenario.

* The BeachTek DXA-5D into the standard 5D2. The camera's analog gain is high, and the digital gain of the ALC (automatic level control) isn't fully squashed by the BeachTek's pilot tone, so I actually had to turn the BeachTek down to calibrate things. I set it at 9 clicks below full scale. (I like that the knob clicks. It's easy to repeat gain levels.)

* The MicroTrack II. It's set at 2 major ticks past mid-way, and two quick taps down. (I wish the firmware provided numbers for easier repeatability. The dots are tiny.) I'm running 44.1 kHz, 24-bits, stereo with the limiter off.

* The juicedLink into the MicroTrack II. From experience, the best setting on the MicroTrack II is 50%. Any lower and I can't get get to full digital levels. I'm running 44.1 kHz, 24-bits, stereo with the limiter off. The juicedLink is set at one dot past noon.


NOT IN THE TEST PLAN - YET

* The BeachTek into the MicroTrack II doesn't make sense. The BeachTek is passive, so it won't let me turn down the MicroTrack II preamps to reduce noise levels.

* I'm not going to bother with the juicedLink into the 5D2 without a pilot tone to disable the ALC.

* I'll try the juicedLink into the 5D2 with a pilot tone at a future date. I want to optimize my tone setup, before I do critical measurements.

* Nobody has offered an H4n yet in the Portland area. This would be another good item to test in the future.

Okay. Step 1 completed. I've got my first round test cases calibrated.

Jon:
In laymens terms...based on what you have seen thus far....can I use my Sennheiser ew100 mikes (assuming I use the Magic Lantern when released) straight into the 5D for a relatively
decent signal. Or do I need to spend money I dont have on the juiced link box you are testing? Im just trying to anticipate an audio configuration that will work.
Tom

...can I use my Sennheiser ew100 mikes (assuming I use the Magic Lantern when released) straight into the 5D for a relatively decent signal.Yes. The mic preamp is part of the wireless system. You shouldn't need an additional preamp after the receiver. As I recall, the ew100 has a line-level output. If anything, you'll need a pad on the output to bring the signal down to (a hot) mic level.

I set up my NT1-A in a basement bathroom that has no outside walls or windows. I suspended the mic in the middle of a blanket-walled PVC frame. I shut the door. I turned off all of the electronics in the neighboring room. The house is out in the hills. I didn't record when some planes passed. It was pretty quiet in there. ;)

After capture, I ran every clip through a 20 Hz, -Inf, 24 dB/oct, shelf EQ to remove any DC offsets. This doesn't affect the sound of the noise, but it calms the meters.

For listening tests in Vegas, on the BeachTek DXA-5D only (to calm the pilot tone), I used EQ to apply a notch filter at 19,740 Hz, -Inf, 0.1 octave bandwidth. I didn't need this in SoundForge, but Vegas' meters didn't like the pilot tone. I can't hear anything up there, so again, it doesn't affect the audible sound.

The clear winner was the juicedLink CX231 into the Canon 5D Mark II with Tramm's Magic Lantern Firmware. The noise is even and continuous. In SoundForge, the meter showed -67 dB. Even after the EQ, there's a little low frequency junk driving the meters. From 1kHz up, the noise is down near -96 dB, which is the limit for 16-bit audio. There's a 2dB bump at 18kHz, and a spike up of -79 dB up at 20.3kHz.

In second place was the juicedLink into the M-Audio MicroTrack II. The MicroTrack has a repetitive noise, but with the juicedLink, I can turn down the recorder gain enough to help hide it. The meter reads -58dB. This combination hits the -96 dB limit around 1.5kHz, but increases with a ripple as the frequency rises. By 16kHz, the noise peaks at -82 dB. We see a bump at 20.3 kHz, which probably comes from the juicedLink, but would be inaudible.

It's possible that the juicedLink/Microtrack would beat the juicedLink/5D when capturing quiet sounds or an insensitive mic. I still have nearly a half-turn available on the JL gain control into the Microtrack. On the 5D, the JL is maxed out. Any additional gain must come from the camera or in post.

It's harder to place the non-juicedLink competitors. The BeachTek/5D combination has the most noise - either with the pilot tone, or with the Magic Lantern and the required +18dB of additional gain in post to match levels. The MicroTrack is quieter, but has an annoying repeating pattern - is sounds like a mechanical sprinkler is running in the background! Though quieter, it might be harder to remove the MicroTrack sound with noise reduction software.

The thing that surprised me about the BeachTek/5D recordings is that they sound virtually identical regardless of the firmware! I thought I might have overwritten a file, but I can clearly see that the pilot tone is only present in one of the clips. The hiss is a bit high, but its even and consistent.

The BeachTek DXA-5D into the 5D with Magic Lantern firmware shows -54dB on the meter. On the frequency plot, there's almost no additional low-frequency noise. It peaks around -74 dB. The noise plot is very smooth, but never dips below -82 dB. It's -79 dB at 16 kHz. Though the noise at any one frequency isn't high, they are combining to create the -54 dB level on the meter.

The BeachTek DXA-5D with the pilot tone into the 5D2 1.1.0 firmware shows -56dB on the meter. The noise is very smooth at around -81 dB. One thing to note is that the ALC isn't fully defeated. It still pumps when you get a very loud sound. That could be good for hands off operation, or bad if you want to control the levels yourself. There is another 9dB or so of gain available above my calibration, so this would likely beat the BeachTek/MagicLantern combination when you need more gain.

The MicroTrack II alone is a bit odd. It is quieter than the BeachTek at low frequencies with -90dB by 900Hz. The noise rises and ripples with frequency. By 16kHz the ripples peak at -71dB and trough at -83dB. Having used this on a short film submitted to an international film festival (we didn't get in - there were 3,000 submissions for 150 slots), the MicroTrack II alone isn't adequate, unless you use a preamp or have a very sensitive mic.

To summarize, the low-noise of the active juicedLink is excellent. I can turn it full bore and get better than 16-bit performance at most frequencies. It's a good match for the 5D2 with Magic Lantern firmware, though we might need to add some gain in the camera to capture low-level sounds or a dull mic. The BeachTek5D combos are noisy, but smooth. The MicroTrack II really needs an active preamp to mask its patterned noise.

Now, on to listening tests...

Thanks for the info John! Its nice not to need to buy something else for a change.

I think I am very happy.....!!

To summarize, the low-noise of the active juicedLink is excellent. I can turn it full bore and get better than 16-bit performance at most frequencies. It's a good match for the 5D2 with Magic Lantern firmware, though we might need to add some gain in the camera to capture low-level sounds or a dull mic. The BeachTek5D combos are noisy, but smooth. The MicroTrack II really needs an active preamp to mask its patterned noise.
That's great news and gives us some further direction for things to try. One easy change is to set the in-camera mic gain to the first step of +10 dB (MGAIN2-0=100). I'm really pleased to hear how successful your results have been in testing the new firmware!

That's great news and gives us some further direction for things to try. One easy change is to set the in-camera mic gain to the first step of +10 dB (MGAIN2-0=100).

I think that's totally viable. Right now, the noise is below the 16-bit threshold, yet, the 12 dB of digital gain is throwing away two bits. 10 dB of analog gain should be perfect. If we get a good balance, then the final firmware could control the digital gain only.

I'm really pleased to hear how successful your results have been in testing the new firmware!

It's been challenging to do right, but seeing and hearing the results is exhilarating!

Here's a 480x270 video that demonstrates my early results (right click to download):
http://p3pictures.com/audio_5d2/5DMarkII_AudioExposed_FirstResults.m4v You can even play it on your iPhone.

And here's a zipped 24-bit wave file for critical listening:
http://p3pictures.com/audio_5d2/5DMarkII_AudioExposed_FirstResults.zip

As mentioned earlier, I calibrated everything with the NT1-A and ran some noise tests. This evening I went outside and recorded some real-world stuff with the calibrated settings, using an Audio Technica AT815b long shotgun above my head. (This is one of the few times when I want the boom mic in the shot!)

In post, I added a 19.740 Hz notch to the BeachTek/5D2 pilot tone audio. I also felt that it was on the hot side, so I lowered the level by 3.5dB in post. That reduces its noise a bit. I also thought that the juicedLink/MagicLantern result might be a bit cold - I think the mic was a touch further from my mouth - so I boosted it by 2dB. I then boosted the whole project by 6dB, so we don't have to turn our amplifiers up quite so high to hear the details.

As expected, the juicedLink/Magic Lantern combo wins the day. The noise is wonderfully low.

BTW, I didn't get the MicroTrack II direct recording to work, due to operator error and failing light. Trust me that it's not much good without a preamp to give it a hand.

I'll work with Tramm to boost the gain in the Magic Lantern firmware. That will let me calibrate again with the BeachTek at full tilt, which will put it in its best light.

Anyway, download and watch this early result. Listen to the uncompressed audio. Let me know which combo you prefer - and if you think it is of pro quality.

Jon, you have linked to the same file twice, sure that was not intended. Both mv4, and no zip link.

I listened to the tests via the .mv4 files and it is clealy looking like we are going to be able to get pretty clean sound out of the Juiced Link Magic Lantern combo.

Thanks for the test results.

Jon, you have linked to the same file twice, was that intended. Both mv4.Fixed. Thanks, Chris!

Here's a 480x270 video that demonstrates my early results
Anyway, download and watch this early result. Listen to the uncompressed audio. Let me know which combo you prefer - and if you think it is of pro quality.

Wonderful. To my non-pro ears the juicedlink/magic lantern combo was easily the best, and if I understand correctly it seems like you can get it even better. There was some noticeable rumble in the juicedlink/magic lantern section that started as you crumpled the paper: I assume that was caused by the breeze.

Thanks very much for the tests.

And here's a zipped 24-bit wave file for critical listening:
http://p3pictures.com/audio_5d2/5DMarkII_AudioExposed_FirstResults.zip

Wow.....what a dramatic difference of noise levels in the tests.. The juiced link / ML sounds spectacular. As an editor I have no problem with the audio generated by this combo
of equipment. It exceeds my expectations of performance.

That was awesome! Great Real-World example. So simple, even I understood it, and What a difference!!!
I'm SO glad I waited before buying the Beachtek. You guys saved me a LOT of money. I owe ya!
Thank you for all your efforts!

Jon Fairhurst. Send Me PM so I send you information on monitoring.

that is great work. I wished u could get a Zoom H4n for the test. I am wondering if it is possible to record the zoom onboard mics via the zoom and 5D2 directly. As of now, I understand most ppl are capturing independantly and syning in post (99.9%) but I am not sure how to do this in Sony Vegas yet. So the best way would be to go directly into the 5D2 for my one man ops.

A Zoom H4n would be awesome. If anybody has one and would be willing to ship it to me for a one day test, I'd be happy to pay for overnight shipping to get it back to them. I'd love to see how it compares with the JL/ML combo, as well as JL/Microtrack II. And I'd like to know if the Zoom works well enough alone, or if an active preamp is needed to provide a clean front end.

The challenge with not having it here is calibration. It's critical that the signal levels match for the comparison to make any sense. Not to mention that the noise tests are a PITA! I left my cell phone on during one run, and I had to start over. Trucks, planes and a bit of rain delayed things as well.

BTW, I need to re-do the "beer test" now that the Magic Lantern firmware has new gain levels. I should have something to post by mid-week...

Jon

PM me and we'll send you our H4N for your tests.


Brian

PM me and we'll send you our H4N for your tests.
Fantastic! PM sent!

So i checked out your video Jon, clearly the juicedlink is the best, i've not yet ordered the mark II just doing research. If I want the kind of setup you spoke of in your video where can i find everything i need?

thanks.

Kamau I suggest waiting until you see jon's latest results with H4N and his latest round of tests.


Brian

I should have the full video up some time this weekend. But here's the short story: both the H4n and juicedLink/5D2-ML are quite good. The H4n let's you separate it from the camera. The JL/5D2-ML is tethered (if not wireless), but you don't have to worry about sync.

If I'm filming somebody across a canyon with a 600mm lens on a 2x extender, give me the H4n. If I need to get the story on tonight's news broadcast - or to the 48-hour film festival judges on time - give me the juicedLink and Magic Lantern.

But this weekend, I should be able to provide a video and wave files for critical listening.

1. Canon 5D Mark II Audio Exposed - Boom Mic (juicedLink, Zoom H4n, Microtrack II, BeachTek) on Vimeo (http://vimeo.com/5370880)

In Part 1 of Canon 5D Mark II Audio Exposed, I compare the Microtrack II, Zoom H4n, BeachTek DXA-5D, and the juicedLink CX 231 when recording a closely placed shotgun mic.

The only processing of the comparison audio was changing gain to match levels. You can download the uncompressed comparison audio here: http://p3pictures.com/audio_5d2/AudioExposed_Part1_Boom.zip

Pending...
Part 2: Camera Mounted Mic
Part 3: Wireless Lavalier
Part 4: Foley
Part 5: Noise Tests and Final Conclusions

Enjoy!

One thing I should point out is that I used 0dB analog gain in the Magic Lantern firmware. When using this with the Beachtek, I had to boost the heck out of it in post, leading to all that noise. Previous tests with 10 dB analog gain and 12 dB digital gain in camera gave better results with the BeachTek, but it was still on the noisy side. Also, the BeachTek was in mono mode for this test. It's possible that it's cleaner in stereo with the signal going just to one channel.

But the real challenge will come in part 2 with the camera mounted setup.

Again, here's part 1...
1. Canon 5D Mark II Audio Exposed - Boom Mic (juicedLink, Zoom H4n, Microtrack II, BeachTek) on Vimeo (http://vimeo.com/5370880)

One thing I should point out is that I used 0dB analog gain in the Magic Lantern firmware. When using this with the Beachtek, I had to boost the heck out of it in post, leading to all that noise. Previous tests with 10 dB analog gain and 12 dB digital gain in camera gave better results with the BeachTek, but it was still on the noisy side. Also, the BeachTek was in mono mode for this test. It's possible that it's cleaner in stereo with the signal going just to one channel.

I might be mis-hearing things, but it seems to me that the previous test with the Beachtek straight into the 5D had much more noise than this version. The Magic Lantern versions sounded about the same. The spectragraph of the initial test sure looked noisier:

http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/magiclantern/images/d/db/Spectragraph_comparison.jpg

Hi Tramm,

On this test I used the Sennheiser ME-80, which is a much hotter mic than my Audio Technica AT815b. That means that I didn't need to boost the gain as much on this run. The juicedLink sounds clean anyway, so you don't notice the lower gain/noise. The BeachTek benefits highly from the hotter signal.

The next test is the On-Camera setup with the Audio Technica at five feet. That will be a much tougher test...

Hi Tramm,

On this test I used the Sennheiser ME-80, which is a much hotter mic than my Audio Technica AT815b. That means that I didn't need to boost the gain as much on this run. The juicedLink sounds clean anyway, so you don't notice the lower gain/noise. The BeachTek benefits highly from the hotter signal.

The next test is the On-Camera setup with the Audio Technica at five feet. That will be a much tougher test...

Jon: On the Beachtek, is there a volume control for the pilot tone. By my experience, a difference in the pilot tone level going into camera, will make a difference as to what is coming out. I would think Beachtek would have allowed for a variable sound.

I think what these test are showing, and what my testing is showing, is that with Magic Lantern, we will have a wide variety of choice to lay decent sound into our cameras.

Juiced link will be a prime tool in that process especially in the one or two man crew situation, but we will absolutely need Magic Lantern to be selectable to raise and lower camera gain depending on the tool being used, and the shooting situation.

2. Canon 5D Mark II Audio Exposed - On Camera (juicedLink, Zoom H4n, Microtrack II, BeachTek) on Vimeo (http://www.vimeo.com/5388476)

In Part 2 of Canon 5D Mark II Audio Exposed, I compare the Microtrack II, Zoom H4n, BeachTek DXA-5D, and the juicedLink CX 231 when recording a camera-mounted long shotgun mic at five feet.

The only processing of the comparison audio was changing gain to match levels. You can download the uncompressed comparison audio here: http://p3pictures.com/audio_5d2/AudioExposed_Part2_OnCamera.zip

Don't miss...
Part 1. Canon 5D Mark II Audio Exposed - Boom Mic (juicedLink, Zoom H4n, Microtrack II, BeachTek) on Vimeo (http://vimeo.com/5370880)
...
Part 3: Wireless Lavalier (pending)
Part 4: Foley (pending)
Part 5: Noise Tests and Final Conclusions (pending)

2. Canon 5D Mark II Audio Exposed - On Camera (juicedLink, Zoom H4n, Microtrack II, BeachTek) on Vimeo (http://www.vimeo.com/5388476)

In Part 2 of Canon 5D Mark II Audio Exposed, I compare the Microtrack II, Zoom H4n, BeachTek DXA-5D, and the juicedLink CX 231 when recording a camera-mounted long shotgun mic at five feet.

The only processing of the comparison audio was changing gain to match levels. You can download the uncompressed comparison audio here: http://p3pictures.com/audio_5d2/AudioExposed_Part2_OnCamera.zip


There seems to be a problem with the zip file. I've downloaded twice, but neither Apple Unarchiver or Stuffit Expander can open it. Stuffit is claiming the file may be damaged.

The uploads are now complete and tested. Enjoy!

The uploads are now complete and tested. Enjoy!
I analyzed the WAV file in the free Sonic Visualiser (http://sonicvisualiser.org/) tool and it is quite striking the difference in noise levels. The darker/bluer the image, the lower the "hiss" and noise. My thoughts on the five tests:

* The Microtrak2 must have some sort of problem to produce so much noise at some harmonic.

* The Zoom sounds very clean.

* The pilot tone on the Beachtek is quite visible (the bright horizontal line). The hiss is also quite apparent (the bright background color).

* With the pilot tone turned off and using the Magic Lantern firmware the hiss is still very apparent.

* The juicedLink + Magic Lantern certainly sounds good and the spectragram shows the least noise. The only negative point is that there does seem to be a very faint inaudible (to me) harmonic up around 20.5 kHz.

Not having to deal with two-system audio will be such a relief! Thanks for running all of these tests, Jon.

One thing to look for in this video is the motion of the bushes in the background. The mic was only about 10 feet from them. Sometimes the bushes are moving about, yet there is little or no wind noise. With other setups, there's no motion at all, but the wind noise is high.

My mic has a low cut switch which I left off purposefully for the test. (I turned the filter on for the narrator bits and EQ'd to make up for the thinner sound.)

One thing I'm not sure of is if the Zoom's low-cut filter is digital or analog. If it's digital, it won't stop the wind from overloading the A/D converters. You really need the low-cut to be in the analog domain, such as on the mic.

Jon:

Thanks for another very informative test !

Chris,

You're welcome!

Tramm,

The visual representation is really telling. The Zoom sounds much quieter than the BeachTek into the ML firmware, but both show a purple background. Looking closely at the BeachTek, the signal is weaker at high frequencies, so the noise might be similar, but the signal to noise is lower.

The JL/ML plot looks amazing. I'd love to test it against a Sound Devices mixer/recorder.

John,

I've been testing the Sound Devices MixPre and Magic Lantern, along with the Juicedlink and the Beachtek. I think the biggest issue for S/N here is the amount of attenuation you put onto the XLR out of the mixer and what level you set in Magic Lantern. I'm currently using a -45db PAD and the level from the Sound Devices needs boosting a little in the camera, I'm assuming a lower value PAD will yield a better result but I have no way to test it.

Also has anyone noticed that the level meters in Magic Lantern pump when being fed a constant tone (1khz) from either a mixer or a tone generator into the Juicedlink. Not sure what's going on there??

Dan

Also has anyone noticed that the level meters in Magic Lantern pump when being fed a constant tone (1khz) from either a mixer or a tone generator into the Juicedlink. Not sure what's going on there?
It is likely due to bad sampling in my code leading to aliasing. My audio level task samples every few ms and does a very simple moving weighted average. I noticed that Canon appears to vary the time between samples to try to avoid this problem.

In regards to the first few seconds of audio being messed up, that is due to Canon's mvr_rec_start() function re-writing the audio registers to their parameters. The task in 0.1.4 re-writes them at 1 Hz, but I have figured out how to register a property handler to get notified when recording starts so that I can re-write them only when necessary.

I'm also working on disabling the power save functions so that the camera won't turn off when Magic Lantern is running. And a config file with gains and zebra levels/enable. Also hdmi output support, slow contrast edge detection and headphone volume control. Coming soon in 0.1.5!

Thanks for the update Tramm. The config files in particular will greatly improve work flow for shooters.

Its like Christmas, Tramm you are a star!

Dan

Tramm,

I just bought one of these FiiO E5 Headphone Amplifier in Black HiFi Headphones (http://www.hifiheadphones.co.uk/fiio-e5-headphone-amplifier-in-black-prodid-1150.html) little headphone amps which works a treat with your hack giving good monitoring levels and a hard button volume control. Only problem is that I need to modify the mini jack at the camera end as it is the three strip type not a stereo one, does anyone know where I can get the right jack plug without butchering a Canon AV cable?

Dan

HOSA GRF-341 TWO FEMALE RCA TO 3.5MM ADAPTER

B&H has it but I got it from Dale Pro Audio because it was a little cheaper and free shipping.

If anyone has a wiring diagram for hacking the AV cable, though, please post. Even though I got the adapter, I'd rather opt for a shorter AV cable wired directly to a headphone jack.

Min Lee, thanks for the link. That adapter is precisely what I'm trying to avoid :) anyone else? I assume you can get the Canon cable as a spare part but I bet its not cheap.

Dan