Hi, could you give me any suggetsions about the position of2 camcorders during an interview?
One should be set in wide and the other one on a close up on the face of the guy interviewed.Please could you tell me through pictures or schemes how to set the 2 camcorders?
thank you

Hi Marcus,

I shoot interviews with two cams. Typically I have them set up about 5 feet apart. One is the primary camera I operate. I use this one for most of the movements, zooms, CU's, ECU's, etc. The other camera is usually set to about a medium shot. Every so often I'll set my primary camera to a good framing and then move over and reframe my second cam. Then I go back to operating my primary cam looking for good opportunities to create a certain feel or mood.

It seems to work pretty good in giving a good variety of shots for editing. It would be much easier to have to operators but this works.

Garrett

Any example online?

I just finished shooting one but the editor elected to use one cam as we needed to get it out really quickly. I'll take some of the footage and try to piece a quick bit together and post it. May take a day or two.

Garrett

You can look at any of Rick Young's interviews at Macvideo. He always uses this technique.

Depends on the style you want, I did a video recently where we had one camera fixed on a tripod at a mid shot while I used the second camera handheld. If my new website goes up soon I'll post a link to the interview.

My approach is very much similar to Garrett's. Here's an example: Ben Ashline - Profile of a Young Racer on Vimeo (http://vimeo.com/3973100).

I have to admit that this is only the second one of these that I've done but "The Kid" liked it so I guess it worked. The prime camera is an XH A1. The secondary is an HV 30.

Tripp: off-topic but I LOVE North Eastern accents: "sittin' in tha CAH..."

My opinion on this is that a second camera doesn't add anything to the contents or even visuals of your movie. If you have time to cut in between footage of an interview, you better make a cut-away to footage that enhances the story instead of showing a boring face from two different angles. It's still a boring talking head, no matter how many cameras you use. ;-)

P.S.: If you really want to use two camcorders, I'd suggest that you have the B-cam handheld, zoomed out wide to show the setting of your subject, and add some stylistic elements (e.g., shaky cam, grainy footage, b/w ...). A second cam on a tripod would look really boring.

Tripp: off-topic but I LOVE North Eastern accents: "sittin' in tha CAH..."
Would you like drawn butter with your lobsta? (grin)

Stefan... Static B cams are pretty boilerplate. Yes they can be uninteresting but like boilerplate, they can be very helpful when you absolutely have to edit and you have no supporting footage to cut to. In a perfect world you'd be right for all the instances we all encounter. However... I don't want to count the crutches in my closet so I won't ask about yours. I prefer to keep the closet door closed whenever I can.

The only up side to a dual "static" camera approach is that if your location is at all interesting, a different angle gives the audience a look at more of the space. It's a nit really, but it is something.

I use the second cam for editing/shooting efficiency more than visual interest. If the interviewee fluffs a line you can just pick up from the beginning of the sentence without the jump-cut you would get with only 1 cam. Likewise removing redundant sentences etc.

If the interviewee fluffs a line you can just pick up from the beginning of the sentence without the jump-cut you would get with only 1 cam. Likewise removing redundant sentences etc.

For me this is the best reason for using 2 cameras. Although just changing the shot every now and then does make it a little more interesting than 1 static shot.

Here is an example that I did recently that I would call a pretty boring interview if shot just 1 camera. It's not all that entertaining anyways unless you know them, but I think it's more watchable the way its cut.

YouTube - Bill and Vicki: Guthrie Dream Wedding (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPye7j2sqV4)

The interview portion starts around the 1 minute mark.

You also might want to consider using a dolly.
Here is a piece I edited which was shot with two cams.
One tripod mounted and one dolly.

Voorkom blessures bij tennis, bekijk de film (http://www.voorkomblessures.nl/csi/websitesportblessure.nsf/wwwVwContent/l2voorkomblessuresbijtennisbekijkdefilm-tennisfilmhtm.htm)

nicely shot and edited Boudewijn.

But does switching from a moving frame to a still frame create an abrupt edit?

To me it does.

Thank you, and normally I would agree with you on this.
Here the closeups where done on key moments in the interview, and they where also used for cutting the interview down from 7 minutes to 2 minutes.

But does switching from a moving frame to a still frame create an abrupt edit?


Whenever possible, if I'm going from a moving shot to a static (or vice versa) I TRY to use a dissolve IF it doesn't look out of place to "soften" the effect of the transition.

CAVEAT: In Boudewijn's video, it looks completely natural to me.

I'd also guess that you'd want to sync up a multi-cam shoot using a flash or slate.