Terry VerHaar
June 2nd, 2009, 05:46 PM
As I am evolving in the video field, I find that my time is split almost equally between shooting and editing. As many shooters do, I have made the investment in certain equipment, rather than rely on renting, so that I have better access for shooting on my own to develop my skills and capabilities. So, having a financial investment in the equipment needed for both those activities, it often strikes me that at all times, half of my business assets are not working for me. Thinking of ways to solve this problem have lead me to an idea about which I was hoping to get some feedback here in the forum by well informed professionals - that would be you!
Recently I had the opportunity to shoot with a jib for the first time so I thought I'd use this as an example. I love well-done motion shots and so would love to have a jib at my disposal. But rental of a jib set-up can be relatively expensive (compared to the price of purchase) or even impossible. And significantly, that means getting my hands on one to "practice" is equally difficult and discourages that approach.
What if I formed an "equipment co-op" with a handful of relatively local, like-minded professionals to purchase a jib system and share it. I have thought through the detailed logistics, which I won't bore you with here, but suffice to say there would be a system of administering a fair sharing arrangement involving an ongoing monthly fee rather than putting cash up front, a system to reserve, check out and check in, and written provisions for joining, opting out and potentially adding additional equipment.
The short question is, if you could get access to a "portfolio" of valuable but less frequently used equipment, like a jib, dolly, 2K lights, or whatever, and that you had a voice in selecting, AT A COST THAT IS MUCH LESS THAN STANDARD RENTAL, would that be appealing? Why or why not? I am not asking for participants here, just testing the mood for whether it is an appealing model.
And, thanks in advance for your thoughts, input and opinions,
TVH
Recently I had the opportunity to shoot with a jib for the first time so I thought I'd use this as an example. I love well-done motion shots and so would love to have a jib at my disposal. But rental of a jib set-up can be relatively expensive (compared to the price of purchase) or even impossible. And significantly, that means getting my hands on one to "practice" is equally difficult and discourages that approach.
What if I formed an "equipment co-op" with a handful of relatively local, like-minded professionals to purchase a jib system and share it. I have thought through the detailed logistics, which I won't bore you with here, but suffice to say there would be a system of administering a fair sharing arrangement involving an ongoing monthly fee rather than putting cash up front, a system to reserve, check out and check in, and written provisions for joining, opting out and potentially adding additional equipment.
The short question is, if you could get access to a "portfolio" of valuable but less frequently used equipment, like a jib, dolly, 2K lights, or whatever, and that you had a voice in selecting, AT A COST THAT IS MUCH LESS THAN STANDARD RENTAL, would that be appealing? Why or why not? I am not asking for participants here, just testing the mood for whether it is an appealing model.
And, thanks in advance for your thoughts, input and opinions,
TVH