View Full Version : 22k vs. 44k sound


Kim Kinser
March 20th, 2004, 06:44 PM
aside from 22k whats the difference? Will I hear an observable quality difference?

What about as it relates to smartsound music?

Thanks,

KIM

Douglas Spotted Eagle
March 20th, 2004, 07:05 PM
you'll absolutely hear an observable difference, particularly on any decent set of speakers. Your high end will be pretty grainy, bottom end will be mushy. think of it as a 72 dpi image vs a 300 dpi image that has been zoomed by 150%

Barry Rivadue
March 20th, 2004, 07:18 PM
That's more than vivid enough. :D

Douglas Spotted Eagle
March 20th, 2004, 07:28 PM
on the music side of things, sometimes we deliberately undersample at low bitrates and sample rates. This is really popular with rap music, to sample drum loops at a low rate to get a grainy, yucky feel, and then transition from the yuck to clean as an effect. That sort of thing is usually undersampled at 2 bit/16K

Peter Jefferson
March 21st, 2004, 12:18 AM
dont u just lurve crunchy 12khz kick drums :)

I woudl only use a lower sample rate if i was intending to overdub audio on teh camera itself.. but as its more efficient doing it in post i usually dont go near 22k..

Peter Jefferson
March 21st, 2004, 12:21 AM
by the way.. dv is actually 48k... cd is 44.1

dv allows 16bit or 12bit audio during recording