Kim Kinser
March 20th, 2004, 06:44 PM
aside from 22k whats the difference? Will I hear an observable quality difference?
What about as it relates to smartsound music?
Thanks,
KIM
What about as it relates to smartsound music?
Thanks,
KIM
View Full Version : 22k vs. 44k sound Kim Kinser March 20th, 2004, 06:44 PM aside from 22k whats the difference? Will I hear an observable quality difference? What about as it relates to smartsound music? Thanks, KIM Douglas Spotted Eagle March 20th, 2004, 07:05 PM you'll absolutely hear an observable difference, particularly on any decent set of speakers. Your high end will be pretty grainy, bottom end will be mushy. think of it as a 72 dpi image vs a 300 dpi image that has been zoomed by 150% Barry Rivadue March 20th, 2004, 07:18 PM That's more than vivid enough. :D Douglas Spotted Eagle March 20th, 2004, 07:28 PM on the music side of things, sometimes we deliberately undersample at low bitrates and sample rates. This is really popular with rap music, to sample drum loops at a low rate to get a grainy, yucky feel, and then transition from the yuck to clean as an effect. That sort of thing is usually undersampled at 2 bit/16K Peter Jefferson March 21st, 2004, 12:18 AM dont u just lurve crunchy 12khz kick drums :) I woudl only use a lower sample rate if i was intending to overdub audio on teh camera itself.. but as its more efficient doing it in post i usually dont go near 22k.. Peter Jefferson March 21st, 2004, 12:21 AM by the way.. dv is actually 48k... cd is 44.1 dv allows 16bit or 12bit audio during recording |