Don White
February 12th, 2004, 12:07 AM
Hey there gang.
It's poor form to have my first post on this delightful site be a longwinded ramble about how screwed-up I may be; highlighting the differences between my understanding of the theory of things and how they really are, but I WILL appreciate being set straight, advised, or otherwise hobnobbed with.
Situation: I have hundreds if not thousands of hours of irreplaceable archival video on decomposing tapes. This stuff goes back 30 years... though I've given up on the 2" quad tapes and the 1" reels. However, I actually have functioning playback decks for the 3/4" stuff, and there's a ton of it.
My plan was to dub it to D8 using a Sony TRV310 camcorder, and thence to DVD using a Panasonic DMR-E50 DVD-R deck. The various theories I employed in deciding this were that D8 using a more robust tape than miniDV, not to mention slightly cheaper. I'm on a budget, and the difference between a Digital8 signal and a DVCAM signal is pretty much nothing. The reason for additionally dubbing to DVD is simply not to have all eggs in one basket archivally. The DMR-E50 does very clean video in 1-hour mode. Moreover, I have to view the finished D8 tapes anyhow to make sure they playback OK, so I might as well be dubbing them at the time. Also, while DVD's are nice for scrubbing through to find stuff quickly, having it on a DV tape will make editing it in FCP easier, which I plan to do from time to time on my mac.
So for the last week I have been dubbing old tapes, using head-cleaning cassettes, and when things have gotten really funky, resorted to acetone (for drum cleaning, not sniffing). How nice to have all these onto neat little D8 tapes.
Except today, after dubbing one of them perfectly (I reviewed the vid quality on my 32" entertainment TV upstairs) to DVD, I started the second tape, and was horrified to see gross pixelation - if that's what you call it - blocky smear when things moved. ARGH! The DVD recorder decided to die at that point, too and refuse to cough up the blank, so it's off to panasonic for repair as proof the universe hates me.
But the pixelation problem vexes me. The camera doesn't pixelate when shooting through its optics and imaging chip, ever, that I've seen, even though it's just a 1-chip cheapie. Presumably the processing of the signal which is fed from its internal chip gets more processing help than an s-vid signal jacked into its side. In which case I need to figure some other kind of hardware, fairly cheap, to get this done.
On the other hand, there was NO such pixelation on the previous tape, recorded several days earlier, which ALSO had a lot of movement, and was recorded using the same decks, camcorder, and setup. So THAT makes me wonder whether it's variation in the Hi8 tape blanks I'm using (TDK premium, all the same type), or if this is a 'dirty head' problem (or something else) in the D8 machine. If any of you would care to take pity on my ignorance and clue me in, I'd appreciate it.
Again, this is being done for a charity with little money to spend. There is also just too much footage to import it into a computer and save it thatway; real-time dubbing is the only way it'll happen.
Thanks!
Don
It's poor form to have my first post on this delightful site be a longwinded ramble about how screwed-up I may be; highlighting the differences between my understanding of the theory of things and how they really are, but I WILL appreciate being set straight, advised, or otherwise hobnobbed with.
Situation: I have hundreds if not thousands of hours of irreplaceable archival video on decomposing tapes. This stuff goes back 30 years... though I've given up on the 2" quad tapes and the 1" reels. However, I actually have functioning playback decks for the 3/4" stuff, and there's a ton of it.
My plan was to dub it to D8 using a Sony TRV310 camcorder, and thence to DVD using a Panasonic DMR-E50 DVD-R deck. The various theories I employed in deciding this were that D8 using a more robust tape than miniDV, not to mention slightly cheaper. I'm on a budget, and the difference between a Digital8 signal and a DVCAM signal is pretty much nothing. The reason for additionally dubbing to DVD is simply not to have all eggs in one basket archivally. The DMR-E50 does very clean video in 1-hour mode. Moreover, I have to view the finished D8 tapes anyhow to make sure they playback OK, so I might as well be dubbing them at the time. Also, while DVD's are nice for scrubbing through to find stuff quickly, having it on a DV tape will make editing it in FCP easier, which I plan to do from time to time on my mac.
So for the last week I have been dubbing old tapes, using head-cleaning cassettes, and when things have gotten really funky, resorted to acetone (for drum cleaning, not sniffing). How nice to have all these onto neat little D8 tapes.
Except today, after dubbing one of them perfectly (I reviewed the vid quality on my 32" entertainment TV upstairs) to DVD, I started the second tape, and was horrified to see gross pixelation - if that's what you call it - blocky smear when things moved. ARGH! The DVD recorder decided to die at that point, too and refuse to cough up the blank, so it's off to panasonic for repair as proof the universe hates me.
But the pixelation problem vexes me. The camera doesn't pixelate when shooting through its optics and imaging chip, ever, that I've seen, even though it's just a 1-chip cheapie. Presumably the processing of the signal which is fed from its internal chip gets more processing help than an s-vid signal jacked into its side. In which case I need to figure some other kind of hardware, fairly cheap, to get this done.
On the other hand, there was NO such pixelation on the previous tape, recorded several days earlier, which ALSO had a lot of movement, and was recorded using the same decks, camcorder, and setup. So THAT makes me wonder whether it's variation in the Hi8 tape blanks I'm using (TDK premium, all the same type), or if this is a 'dirty head' problem (or something else) in the D8 machine. If any of you would care to take pity on my ignorance and clue me in, I'd appreciate it.
Again, this is being done for a charity with little money to spend. There is also just too much footage to import it into a computer and save it thatway; real-time dubbing is the only way it'll happen.
Thanks!
Don