Paul Vlachos
January 31st, 2004, 06:51 PM
Hi All.
I'm interviewing two people who usually team up, and I'm debating whether to interview them together or separately. Still not sure yet, although there are pros and cons to doing it both ways.
If I do them together, though, I'm stuck with a dilemma. First, I'd have to get another lavalier, as I only have one. OR, I could have a mic on a boom between them at waist level, but I'm worried about the reverb - for lack of a better way to describe it - that would introduce into the mix.
If I *were* to get another lavalier, though, would it be better to just record one on each channel so that I could keep them separate for post, or would there be any advantage to mixing them in a tiny mixer and recording the mix on both channels.
I hope this isn't too simplistic a question, but I'm relatively new to video. Most of my past work is still photography.
Thanks in advance for any advice.
I'm interviewing two people who usually team up, and I'm debating whether to interview them together or separately. Still not sure yet, although there are pros and cons to doing it both ways.
If I do them together, though, I'm stuck with a dilemma. First, I'd have to get another lavalier, as I only have one. OR, I could have a mic on a boom between them at waist level, but I'm worried about the reverb - for lack of a better way to describe it - that would introduce into the mix.
If I *were* to get another lavalier, though, would it be better to just record one on each channel so that I could keep them separate for post, or would there be any advantage to mixing them in a tiny mixer and recording the mix on both channels.
I hope this isn't too simplistic a question, but I'm relatively new to video. Most of my past work is still photography.
Thanks in advance for any advice.