Oliver Pollak
January 29th, 2004, 11:54 AM
Hello there,
I've been working with the XL1 and XL1s in conjunction with the standard 16x auto lens and the 3x wide-angle for some time now. I am fed up with both lenses. They do their job when you gotta be quick but in controlled situations I'd like to be more in control over the lens too. The servo driven zoom and focus is a pain. Also (and oddly enough, nobody has mentioned that so far, I believe) whenever I zoom via rocker or zoom ring, the focus ring does not respond. I find this a real pain too. Quite often I found myself zooming in with the super-slow crawl, realizing that my focus went off and left with no possibilities to rectify my focus without letting go from the zoom, thus ruining a potentially interesting shot. Obviously you'd check the focus zoomed in first, but sometimes things had to be rushed. Did you encounter the same problem?
Anyhow, I am thinking of getting a manual lens. As far as I can see there are three (adaptors aside), but correct me if I am wrong:
Canon 16x
Canon 14x
Fujinon/Optex 14x
I am a bit puzzled that people don't seem to bother too much that the Canon 16x has not got an iris ring. Is my thinking wrong that, if I get a manual lens, then I want it to be truly manual, down to the iris? Imagine the same scenario: super-slow-zoom in (I admit I love it), light situation changes, turning the wheel gives you nasty half stop jumps, thus ruining the shot again.
Has Canon's 14x an iris ring?
Are the Canon 14x and Fujinon 14x still available? How much are they?
Has Canons 14x a servo for the zoom?
Is my thinking right that a lens, with a mechanical iris ring AND capable of automatic exposure would need a servo for the iris? Does such a lens exist for the XL1(s)?
Why wouldn't it be possible to turn the iris to a desired position and the camera decides automatically on the apropriate shutter speed to get good exposure?
What are the problems if the lens doesn't talk to the camera at all, like the Fujinon does?
And one more; I never got that: what is the issue with white balancing not being possible in auto on those lenses. What has white balance got to do with the lens?
Also, I hear conflicting messages about their optical qualities. Any opinions on that?
Ups, sorry long message... Any reply appreciated. (Please excuse my English... it's not my mother tongue...)
Cheers to you all,
Oliver.
I've been working with the XL1 and XL1s in conjunction with the standard 16x auto lens and the 3x wide-angle for some time now. I am fed up with both lenses. They do their job when you gotta be quick but in controlled situations I'd like to be more in control over the lens too. The servo driven zoom and focus is a pain. Also (and oddly enough, nobody has mentioned that so far, I believe) whenever I zoom via rocker or zoom ring, the focus ring does not respond. I find this a real pain too. Quite often I found myself zooming in with the super-slow crawl, realizing that my focus went off and left with no possibilities to rectify my focus without letting go from the zoom, thus ruining a potentially interesting shot. Obviously you'd check the focus zoomed in first, but sometimes things had to be rushed. Did you encounter the same problem?
Anyhow, I am thinking of getting a manual lens. As far as I can see there are three (adaptors aside), but correct me if I am wrong:
Canon 16x
Canon 14x
Fujinon/Optex 14x
I am a bit puzzled that people don't seem to bother too much that the Canon 16x has not got an iris ring. Is my thinking wrong that, if I get a manual lens, then I want it to be truly manual, down to the iris? Imagine the same scenario: super-slow-zoom in (I admit I love it), light situation changes, turning the wheel gives you nasty half stop jumps, thus ruining the shot again.
Has Canon's 14x an iris ring?
Are the Canon 14x and Fujinon 14x still available? How much are they?
Has Canons 14x a servo for the zoom?
Is my thinking right that a lens, with a mechanical iris ring AND capable of automatic exposure would need a servo for the iris? Does such a lens exist for the XL1(s)?
Why wouldn't it be possible to turn the iris to a desired position and the camera decides automatically on the apropriate shutter speed to get good exposure?
What are the problems if the lens doesn't talk to the camera at all, like the Fujinon does?
And one more; I never got that: what is the issue with white balancing not being possible in auto on those lenses. What has white balance got to do with the lens?
Also, I hear conflicting messages about their optical qualities. Any opinions on that?
Ups, sorry long message... Any reply appreciated. (Please excuse my English... it's not my mother tongue...)
Cheers to you all,
Oliver.