Laurence Spiegel
January 15th, 2004, 01:38 PM
I am having a bit of trouble determining what camera fits my needs, and how much difference the cam makes vs my technique.
My main purpose film salsa practice to help understand and learn the motions we're working on. For Salsa, I need to be inconspicous and not distract others. I will have permission to film - nothing surriptitious - but it's desirable that little attention is drawn to the camera.
Lighting is modest; 100w bulbs overhead maybe 10' apart. There's a few dark spots under a dead bulb for example. Another student who occasionally tapes with a Sony PC101 gets an image OK near the light and nothing under a dead lamp. It doesn't seem to be a major headache for him, though. The PC101 is hardly noticable; it doesn't draw your eye or attention.
I'll also film outdoors; mostly catching the many shades of light and surf throughout a day.
I bought an 852 which arrived yesterday, and checked out a Sony TRV22 in store. That was tethered so I couldn't move to a dim spot. I checked the infrared mode, but couldn't set or even monitor it's shutter speed. It's green image was ugly but clear enough. It seemed like the TRV is much "quieter" to look at - the small size and lens don't say "hey you're on camera!!". From other posts I gather that the 22 works a bit better in dim light. Can I just clobber the light issue with a _soft_ on camera lamp? <not very quiet!>
* Would the Sony or the Panasonic fit my needs better, or does my tecnique more important than the equipment? Keep the 852 or not? *
The 852 has an optical stabilizer so I don't have to trade quality for a stable image, and I've read of many happy users here in this forum. I gives the impression of being a more serious machine. The TRV looks like it's intended for the casual user.machine, but it's smaller and doesn't present to big eye of the 852.
Thanks for reading this long post! Any comments from folks with more experience are appreciated.
My main purpose film salsa practice to help understand and learn the motions we're working on. For Salsa, I need to be inconspicous and not distract others. I will have permission to film - nothing surriptitious - but it's desirable that little attention is drawn to the camera.
Lighting is modest; 100w bulbs overhead maybe 10' apart. There's a few dark spots under a dead bulb for example. Another student who occasionally tapes with a Sony PC101 gets an image OK near the light and nothing under a dead lamp. It doesn't seem to be a major headache for him, though. The PC101 is hardly noticable; it doesn't draw your eye or attention.
I'll also film outdoors; mostly catching the many shades of light and surf throughout a day.
I bought an 852 which arrived yesterday, and checked out a Sony TRV22 in store. That was tethered so I couldn't move to a dim spot. I checked the infrared mode, but couldn't set or even monitor it's shutter speed. It's green image was ugly but clear enough. It seemed like the TRV is much "quieter" to look at - the small size and lens don't say "hey you're on camera!!". From other posts I gather that the 22 works a bit better in dim light. Can I just clobber the light issue with a _soft_ on camera lamp? <not very quiet!>
* Would the Sony or the Panasonic fit my needs better, or does my tecnique more important than the equipment? Keep the 852 or not? *
The 852 has an optical stabilizer so I don't have to trade quality for a stable image, and I've read of many happy users here in this forum. I gives the impression of being a more serious machine. The TRV looks like it's intended for the casual user.machine, but it's smaller and doesn't present to big eye of the 852.
Thanks for reading this long post! Any comments from folks with more experience are appreciated.