Frank Granovski
November 10th, 2003, 04:41 PM
A buddy of mine decided to get married after living in sin for 10 years. So, he slapped down $400,000 on a newer $525,000 Vancouver home (8 bedrooms), and slapped down another $10,000 for his wedding. Against his better judgement, though, and for the sake of getting along with his other half, the future whiff made all the wedding arrangements.
My wife and I spoke with her and made several suggestions:[list=1] I would do the photos at cost or the video for free or even both to save them money. Hire one of my 2 photo buddies (world renowned, actually) for $500 total (and I do the video for free). Or hire my wife's cousin who specializes in wedding photography---an excellent choice. (He also has an okay video guy working for him.)[/list=1]But no, she picked a heavily advertised pro/non-pro outfit which consisted of 2 clowns.
The photographer had come with his wife to help him, but she was instead burning up the dance floor from beginning to end---except for time out during the free meal. This poor fellow (with the wayward wife) had these 2 flood lights set up. At least, I thought they were flood lights because they were not bright at all, and were improperly positioned. The camera he used was an inexpensive Canon 35mm auto everything with a built-in flash. The film? Fuji 800 ASA consumer film of course, the kind you can buy in a 5 pack and is always on sale.
The video guy was a little better prepared. His cam was the GL2; and he had told me that he liked the GL2 because it has bigger chips and better colour than the Panasonic XL1. (I told him the Japanese version was charcoal coloured.) Mounted on his cam was a tiny light. However, he was set up approximately 50 feet from the bride and groom at the reception, and during the ceremony he had shot the whole shebang into a very large, brightly sun-lit picture window, which was just 2 feet behind the bride and groom. Oh, yeah, like his photographer partner (less the dancing whiff), the videographer also used auto everything. And wise not? :-)
I finally got to see the hokey duo's damage the other day. Unfortunately, the pictures were not even trash bin worthy (some tramp might find them and get sick). The video, well, it wasn't good but at least they edited the footage. Mind you, the good stuff was all missing. In conclusion, my buddy's little whiff was real happy with the results, while my buddy looked like he wanted to kill something. :-)
My wife and I spoke with her and made several suggestions:[list=1] I would do the photos at cost or the video for free or even both to save them money. Hire one of my 2 photo buddies (world renowned, actually) for $500 total (and I do the video for free). Or hire my wife's cousin who specializes in wedding photography---an excellent choice. (He also has an okay video guy working for him.)[/list=1]But no, she picked a heavily advertised pro/non-pro outfit which consisted of 2 clowns.
The photographer had come with his wife to help him, but she was instead burning up the dance floor from beginning to end---except for time out during the free meal. This poor fellow (with the wayward wife) had these 2 flood lights set up. At least, I thought they were flood lights because they were not bright at all, and were improperly positioned. The camera he used was an inexpensive Canon 35mm auto everything with a built-in flash. The film? Fuji 800 ASA consumer film of course, the kind you can buy in a 5 pack and is always on sale.
The video guy was a little better prepared. His cam was the GL2; and he had told me that he liked the GL2 because it has bigger chips and better colour than the Panasonic XL1. (I told him the Japanese version was charcoal coloured.) Mounted on his cam was a tiny light. However, he was set up approximately 50 feet from the bride and groom at the reception, and during the ceremony he had shot the whole shebang into a very large, brightly sun-lit picture window, which was just 2 feet behind the bride and groom. Oh, yeah, like his photographer partner (less the dancing whiff), the videographer also used auto everything. And wise not? :-)
I finally got to see the hokey duo's damage the other day. Unfortunately, the pictures were not even trash bin worthy (some tramp might find them and get sick). The video, well, it wasn't good but at least they edited the footage. Mind you, the good stuff was all missing. In conclusion, my buddy's little whiff was real happy with the results, while my buddy looked like he wanted to kill something. :-)