Lee Roberts
February 23rd, 2009, 06:41 AM
Hi,
I have a 100 and a 200, and I'm having an incredibly difficult time calibrating the cameras to match. Some of the things I've tried (connected to two HD monitors):
- Loading standard scene files posted on DVInfo for the respective cameras (e.g. Paulo's True Color, et al - I've made certain I was grabbing the correct scene files for each model)
- Fiddling with the various settings for hours trying to get a 'match'.
A typical testing scenario goes like this:
- Hook everything up to the monitors
- Load a scene file to have some sort of baseline starting point.
- Begin tweaking every setting I can find to make the cameras match
I've looked at the images on a 'soft' waveform monitor (like the monitor provided in Vegas), but since I have no idea how to actually use the waveform things, they've been of little help.
The HD-200 almost always seems to have a little green bias (hope that's how you say that). For example, I was attempting to calibrate with several objects in the image - a red thing, a blue thing, a green thing, a thing that has several shades of 'skin tones' - all on a brown, cordory-type bedspread. No matter what I try, the bedspread always seems to have some green 'tinitng' on the 200, and either looks exactly correct on the 100 or will trend a little red. If someone has a definitive method (read: tutorial) for calibrating with a chart and the scopes, I would appreciate some direction. I've googled and found some things, but they have been more generic in nature. Something specific to the 100 & 200 would be nice.
Also, I have two other issuses with the 200:
- I have two 'dead pixels' (I guess that's what they would be called - bright/dark spots that appear on the monitor)
- For some reason, the 200's image has become noisy. I'm coming up on the 1 year anniversary for this camera, so maybe it's a warranty thing?
Anyway, I'm so frustrated with this that I'm at the point where I'm ready to send the cameras to someone else to have them calibrated. I can get them very close (close enough so that a slight adjustment in post fixes everything), but I want better than that. For the record, I thought I could look at what I was doing in post and then appply that to the camera, but to no avail.
I'm a newb, so feel free to blast me. Thanks in advance for your input.
Best ~ Lee
P.S. For the record, why is it that my dinky 100's image is (and always has been) better than the image on my 200? Not just a tad better either....a lot better. I swapped cameras when I first bought the 200, but it didn't help (maybe they were from the same production run?) Thanks again.......
P.P.S. I've gone into the 'Advanced Settings' and messed with the RGB gain and rotation to address the green tinting thing, but that doesn'r seem to be the answer. In fact, I don't think there is an area in the cameras process areas thay I haven't messed with...just an fyi.
I have a 100 and a 200, and I'm having an incredibly difficult time calibrating the cameras to match. Some of the things I've tried (connected to two HD monitors):
- Loading standard scene files posted on DVInfo for the respective cameras (e.g. Paulo's True Color, et al - I've made certain I was grabbing the correct scene files for each model)
- Fiddling with the various settings for hours trying to get a 'match'.
A typical testing scenario goes like this:
- Hook everything up to the monitors
- Load a scene file to have some sort of baseline starting point.
- Begin tweaking every setting I can find to make the cameras match
I've looked at the images on a 'soft' waveform monitor (like the monitor provided in Vegas), but since I have no idea how to actually use the waveform things, they've been of little help.
The HD-200 almost always seems to have a little green bias (hope that's how you say that). For example, I was attempting to calibrate with several objects in the image - a red thing, a blue thing, a green thing, a thing that has several shades of 'skin tones' - all on a brown, cordory-type bedspread. No matter what I try, the bedspread always seems to have some green 'tinitng' on the 200, and either looks exactly correct on the 100 or will trend a little red. If someone has a definitive method (read: tutorial) for calibrating with a chart and the scopes, I would appreciate some direction. I've googled and found some things, but they have been more generic in nature. Something specific to the 100 & 200 would be nice.
Also, I have two other issuses with the 200:
- I have two 'dead pixels' (I guess that's what they would be called - bright/dark spots that appear on the monitor)
- For some reason, the 200's image has become noisy. I'm coming up on the 1 year anniversary for this camera, so maybe it's a warranty thing?
Anyway, I'm so frustrated with this that I'm at the point where I'm ready to send the cameras to someone else to have them calibrated. I can get them very close (close enough so that a slight adjustment in post fixes everything), but I want better than that. For the record, I thought I could look at what I was doing in post and then appply that to the camera, but to no avail.
I'm a newb, so feel free to blast me. Thanks in advance for your input.
Best ~ Lee
P.S. For the record, why is it that my dinky 100's image is (and always has been) better than the image on my 200? Not just a tad better either....a lot better. I swapped cameras when I first bought the 200, but it didn't help (maybe they were from the same production run?) Thanks again.......
P.P.S. I've gone into the 'Advanced Settings' and messed with the RGB gain and rotation to address the green tinting thing, but that doesn'r seem to be the answer. In fact, I don't think there is an area in the cameras process areas thay I haven't messed with...just an fyi.