Jon Fairhurst
February 6th, 2009, 02:02 AM
My sons, their friends and I have submitted a 14 minute short to the Seattle Film Festival. It's the pilot for The Murder of Dirk Snowglobe, a film noir detective comedy that will be a web series.
Mark Hahn, asked the following in another thread, so I created this one...
I have an indie in the script-writing phase right now. We are planning on using only the 5D2 and some rental accessories. My daughter works in Hollywood and she has many friends who are published writers, network soap opera actors, indie actors, director wannabes, etc. They are all in their late 20's (the little creeps). They all want to be in an indie to improve their portfolio. I've never done film production but I'm learning as fast as I can. I'm all that they've got for free shooting.
Could you share some more detail on your overall experience/process?
Did you use any kind of stabilizer?
Did you convert it to film for Seattle?
Did you use fixed ND or var ND?
Any chance for me to see it?
Maybe this should be a new thread?
For the stabilizer, we used the small SteadyTracker, which gave us a damped hand-held look. To my eyes, it's stable enough. Hopefully, it won't make people seasick on a larger screen. We didn't have any radical pans or motion, so it worked for us, but it certainly didn't give a smooth SteadyCam look. It was good for looking hand held without being hand held.
We had a separate focus puller, but no follow focus. It was hand on lens. It worked - mostly - but apparently led to many takes. (I wasn't on location. I composed/performed the music, and mixed the audio a few hundred miles away.)
We will deliver to SIFF on HDCAM, if accepted. They only accept DVDs for submissions, which was good, since we hand delivered at the last minute. Being able to render to DVD from proxies saved a ton of time.
SIFF allows us to list things we will change before a possible late May showing. We've still got work to do. Our last two scenes are perfect, but the beginning is weak. Doing 14 minutes of music in four days was tough. I'm glad I have time to polish it.
SIFF will be the premiere, so I'd rather not share it - especially since the final isn't yet done.
Nathan applied some unique color correction (no cool tones, muted warm tones, semi-high contrast.) The night scenes look especially good. It's not traditional B&W noir. It's our own look.
We didn't shoot anything in daylight, so there was no need for ND filters.
I like the look on the screening DVD. Any problems - and we hope to fix them all - are due to other factors than the camera. We'll there are some focus pulling problems, but those can happen with a Panavision film camera as easily as with the 5D MkII. Certainly, a follow focus and monitor would have been better than our mark, shoot and review (with magnification) approach.
I haven't seen the 1080p version, but Nathan claims that the bits he's looked at look great. (He pretty much went straight to proxies, and rendered to low res for me to compose to and then to DVD.) I haven't seen a single shimmer, so that means we can fix any aliased edges, if needed, in post with selective filtering.
Of course, the best parts about using this camera were the shallow DOF and night scenes. One murder scene was shot at my son's place. The kitchen is one of the backgrounds. (They even cleaned it!) There is just enough light spill in the kitchen to give it definition, but it's out of focus and desaturated, so it looks great. If this were shot directly on a typical camcorder, it would have been just some noisy, crummy looking old suburban kitchen.
Over time, we'll put more up at our website. For now, everybody is back at school and/or work and trying to catch up on sleep...
Best of luck with your project, Mark!
Mark Hahn, asked the following in another thread, so I created this one...
I have an indie in the script-writing phase right now. We are planning on using only the 5D2 and some rental accessories. My daughter works in Hollywood and she has many friends who are published writers, network soap opera actors, indie actors, director wannabes, etc. They are all in their late 20's (the little creeps). They all want to be in an indie to improve their portfolio. I've never done film production but I'm learning as fast as I can. I'm all that they've got for free shooting.
Could you share some more detail on your overall experience/process?
Did you use any kind of stabilizer?
Did you convert it to film for Seattle?
Did you use fixed ND or var ND?
Any chance for me to see it?
Maybe this should be a new thread?
For the stabilizer, we used the small SteadyTracker, which gave us a damped hand-held look. To my eyes, it's stable enough. Hopefully, it won't make people seasick on a larger screen. We didn't have any radical pans or motion, so it worked for us, but it certainly didn't give a smooth SteadyCam look. It was good for looking hand held without being hand held.
We had a separate focus puller, but no follow focus. It was hand on lens. It worked - mostly - but apparently led to many takes. (I wasn't on location. I composed/performed the music, and mixed the audio a few hundred miles away.)
We will deliver to SIFF on HDCAM, if accepted. They only accept DVDs for submissions, which was good, since we hand delivered at the last minute. Being able to render to DVD from proxies saved a ton of time.
SIFF allows us to list things we will change before a possible late May showing. We've still got work to do. Our last two scenes are perfect, but the beginning is weak. Doing 14 minutes of music in four days was tough. I'm glad I have time to polish it.
SIFF will be the premiere, so I'd rather not share it - especially since the final isn't yet done.
Nathan applied some unique color correction (no cool tones, muted warm tones, semi-high contrast.) The night scenes look especially good. It's not traditional B&W noir. It's our own look.
We didn't shoot anything in daylight, so there was no need for ND filters.
I like the look on the screening DVD. Any problems - and we hope to fix them all - are due to other factors than the camera. We'll there are some focus pulling problems, but those can happen with a Panavision film camera as easily as with the 5D MkII. Certainly, a follow focus and monitor would have been better than our mark, shoot and review (with magnification) approach.
I haven't seen the 1080p version, but Nathan claims that the bits he's looked at look great. (He pretty much went straight to proxies, and rendered to low res for me to compose to and then to DVD.) I haven't seen a single shimmer, so that means we can fix any aliased edges, if needed, in post with selective filtering.
Of course, the best parts about using this camera were the shallow DOF and night scenes. One murder scene was shot at my son's place. The kitchen is one of the backgrounds. (They even cleaned it!) There is just enough light spill in the kitchen to give it definition, but it's out of focus and desaturated, so it looks great. If this were shot directly on a typical camcorder, it would have been just some noisy, crummy looking old suburban kitchen.
Over time, we'll put more up at our website. For now, everybody is back at school and/or work and trying to catch up on sleep...
Best of luck with your project, Mark!