View Full Version : New Coollights LED600 Arrived Today
Richard Andrewski March 8th, 2009, 03:31 PM I too will be interested to hear how it does outdoors and whether you needed the minus green or not. Seems that Stewart, the guy that started this thread, in his review was using them outdoors and it seemed he didn't use the minus green. Normally for best results you would need to because daylight is full spectrum of course and the LEDs aren't.
Jaadgy Akanni March 9th, 2009, 10:20 AM Hi Richard. How long does it take for an order placed today to get to New York City? I need some lights for this weekend. Thank you
Richard Andrewski March 9th, 2009, 05:32 PM Hi Jaadgy,
Fedex Ground (the most commonly chosen method) is usually about 5 days or so to NYC from Reno, NV where we ship from. Of course faster methods are available but can get pretty high for the larger package sizes. You can go on our website and go through the checkout up to payment and you should see the shipping options and corresponding costs for each one.
Dean Sensui March 10th, 2009, 01:31 AM Here's a frame grab from the cooking demo.
The room had a fair amount of daylight coming in through huge picture windows behind the camera. All indirect sunlight.
The Cool Lights were used to provide some "direction" to the lighting, placed on either side of the camera with 1/2 minus green gel.
This shot was color-corrected with Apple's Color. Some slight gradient added to the top and side margins to draw attention toward the center of the shot.
BTW: even though the LED lights are missing a lot of the spectrum with wavelengths longer than 600 nm, they still looked good to me. No weird highlights or shadows. And after we worked this site for four hours, we could pack up the lights right away without having to wait for them to cool off!
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/attachment.php?attachmentid=11230&stc=1&d=1236670206
Richard Andrewski March 10th, 2009, 04:35 AM Are you in front of the camera or behind it Dean?
Dean Sensui March 10th, 2009, 03:06 PM Are you in front of the camera or behind it Dean?
Strictly behind the camera. :-)
The photo includes: Margot Oshiro, our "field reporter" who caught the barracuda that gets cooked up. Dave Lancaster, the host for the "Reel Recipe" segment. Cindy Paliracio, our "anchor host". And Naoki, a gyotaku artist. He took Margot fishing, then printed the fish for her at his studio. Gyotaku is an old Japanese art where a fish is imprinted directly onto a sheet of paper. This was before cameras were invented, and allowed a fisherman to prove that he really did catch a fish that big.
Dan Brockett March 10th, 2009, 06:17 PM Hi Dean:
Nice set and the lighting looks pretty good.
Just out of curiosity and going totally OT here but in California, we are always catching Barracuda but few eat them for fear of Ciguatera poisoning. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ciguatera Is that not a concern in Hawaii? I have also dove all over the Caribbean and most places I have been, people avoid eating Barracuda, because of fear of getting the poisoning. It's a shame since their diet consist of nothing but high protein bait fish, I bet they would taste great.
Just curious because I have heard this beginning 35 years ago when I began fishing as a kid and also heard it all throughout my diving career, especially when I am with spearhunters and they are spearing fish.
My first official commercial dive video that I shot as a promo for a resort in Honduras, I had some great shots of me with the camera, face to face with a 6 foot Barracuda, just drifting, staring me down. Great shots on Hi-8. Those were the dropout filled days...
Dan
Dean Sensui March 10th, 2009, 06:36 PM Dan...
The "set" is actually the SubZero/Wolf showroom in Honolulu. They're very nice about letting us film our cooking segments there.
There is a problem with ciguatera here, too. There's a testing kit that we demonstrated during the printing segment of the show. Naoki took a tiny amount of the meat and had his assistant check it. Cigua-Check Fish Poison Test Kit (http://cigua.com/) The meat tested "clean".
Someone recently told me that the risk is higher when certain conditions coincide: rain and runoff, followed by lots of bright sunlight. I'll have to follow up on that sometime.
Dan Brockett March 10th, 2009, 07:41 PM Aha, a testing kit. I did not know that such a thing existed. Did you try some?
Dan
Richard Andrewski March 10th, 2009, 07:45 PM Hehe, hope that testing kit is reliable. Dean, sounds like you've taken up the tradition of Gyotaku with more modern technology now...
Dean Sensui March 10th, 2009, 10:56 PM The test kit seems to work... so far.
Used it on three different barracuda caught in the same area and no one got sick. As I understand it, the kit uses a "go - no go" threshold. If you see any blue on the sample swab the fish is hot. If it's white, and there's a comparison patch just to make sure, it's not.
Mitchell Lewis December 7th, 2009, 08:58 AM Anyone have an idea how this fixture compares to a Kino Flo Diva Light 400 (4-bulb)? I'm lighting a 15 x 15-ft chroma key wall. I'm planning to buy two Kino Flo Foto-Flo 400's studio lights (4 x 4-ft bulbs per fixture), and four Kino Flo Diva Light 400's.
I also would use the Diva lights for location shoots. But a two light kit with case weighs 65 lbs and I'm not thrilled about dragging two 65 lb cases around when the lightweight Cool Light CL-LED600's could possibly accomplish the same thing (plus save a TON of money).
Any advice would be appreciated. :)
Dan Brockett December 7th, 2009, 01:39 PM Hi Mitchell:
I own two of the LED600s and two of my own homemade Diva 200s. I would advise using fluoros for green screen illumination over the LEDs. The reason being that the LEDs actually will somewhat show a lot of brighter and dimmer areas within their beam since the light is actually coming from 600 tiny 5mm bulbs vs. two or four 55 watt Biax tubes. The entire goal of lighting green screens are to achieve uniform illumination across the screen. The fluoros also have the advantage that they are softer and less specular than LEDs. This isn't to say that you couldn't use the LED600s for green screen, I have. But I feel that a fluoro is a better tool for this particular task.
The CoolLights fluoros are excellent, a much better value than the Kino Divas although the Kinos are really nice if you can afford them. I made my own a few years ago, but if I was buying today, I would have bought the CoolLights, they cost the same as the ones I built from scratch plus it took quite a few hours of my time too to construct them.
Enjoy,
Dan
Mitchell Lewis December 7th, 2009, 03:35 PM Thanks Dan. We can afford the Diva's.......I think I'm still leaning toward getting them. They seem like the "safe route" for pro use. No?
Francois Xavier December 8th, 2009, 09:49 AM Richard, I tried to place an order from Switzerland but your software doesn't let me select any shipping - it says Fedex is the only option, but I can't choose it and the next step makes a big error with "ERROR_NO_SHIPPING_SELECTED_SELECTED". Is it possible at all to order from abroad?
Richard Andrewski December 8th, 2009, 09:51 AM Hi Francois,
We just handle all international orders through email. Send me an email at info@coollights.biz about what you were wanting and we'll take care of it. Thanks for your interest.
|
|