Alastair Brown
December 22nd, 2008, 03:26 AM
I just ran across something that really has me scratching my head.
Editing HDV Footage.
Normally, I render to M2t then drag the individual m2t's into DVD Architect and use the fit to disc option within architect. A typical wedding DVD is taking about 11 hrs on a Q6600.
Had a project kept stalling on me yesterday so decided to render out the individual streams from Vegas.
What a difference. It's screaming through them!!!!!
Whole lot will prob take about 2hrs in total.
So...my question is, does DVD Architect not make use of the four cores of my Q6600 when rendering? Thats the only reason I can think of that would seems to tie in with it taking 4 times as long.
Having just ordered a new i7 system, this may have been an expensive overlook on my case. If it saves someone else from treading the same path, then thats great.
Editing HDV Footage.
Normally, I render to M2t then drag the individual m2t's into DVD Architect and use the fit to disc option within architect. A typical wedding DVD is taking about 11 hrs on a Q6600.
Had a project kept stalling on me yesterday so decided to render out the individual streams from Vegas.
What a difference. It's screaming through them!!!!!
Whole lot will prob take about 2hrs in total.
So...my question is, does DVD Architect not make use of the four cores of my Q6600 when rendering? Thats the only reason I can think of that would seems to tie in with it taking 4 times as long.
Having just ordered a new i7 system, this may have been an expensive overlook on my case. If it saves someone else from treading the same path, then thats great.