View Full Version : Your Thoughts on EX1 run and gun ability?
Steve Montoto December 19th, 2008, 09:05 AM I video weddings and I am looking for a HDV camera that will have the low light ability similar to the pd170. I have read that the autofocus on the EX1 is less than great, so I wanted to know if it is not recomended for run and gun type situations. Im not an expert camera operator but I do know my way around them somewhat.
Just wanted to know your thoughts or recomendations before I jump in and purchase one.
Thanks,
Steve
Bob Kerner December 19th, 2008, 09:25 AM I'll start by saying that I don't own an EX-1 yet but this question has been asked here, so you should use the search feature.
Before you buy, you might want to rent and try it out for yourself. I'll be doing that after the holidays. It's the only way you'll know for sure. Also the Vortex Media disc is very informative. Essentially, their advice is to not rely on autofocus...ever. It does a good job, but it's not perfect, according to the instructor on the DVD.
The bigger issue may be hand holding it, if that's what you mean by run and gun. Some complain about the ergonomics of the hand grip. Another reason to invest in a rental.
Bob
Vincent Oliver December 19th, 2008, 09:40 AM The other more important thing to consider is how well it converts HD into SD (for DVD). So far I am not having much luck, but it's still early days. I may have to resort to using the Canon XH A1 for SD weddings.
btw. I have the EX3
Jay Gladwell December 19th, 2008, 10:06 AM The other more important thing to consider is how well it converts HD into SD (for DVD). So far I am not having much luck, but it's still early days.
Sorry to hear that, Vincent. I also have the EX3 and I'm getting excellent results going from HD to SD (for DVD).
It could be your NLE.
Vincent Oliver December 19th, 2008, 10:09 AM Jay,
I would appreciate any help or tips you can give.
I am nearly there but not quite, any shots which have a pan involved have a lot of artifacts. I am using Premiere Pro CS3 with Encore CS3.
I love the camera and I am sure I will get there, but it may take a few more permutations.
Matt Davis December 19th, 2008, 10:13 AM I wanted to know if it is not recomended for run and gun type situations. Im not an expert camera operator but I do know my way around them somewhat.
I've owned an EX1 since April, shooting a fair amount of Corporate & Conference Candids, which are specifically Run & Gun. I started with PD150s then Z1s. I am sticking to my EX1!
The ergonomics aren't perfect, but you get around them. What works for me is the Hood-pro sock magnifier and an odd Vulcan Nerve Pinch left handed grip round the lens hood, with the right hand wodging the whole affair into the shoulder. Then there's the magnified view for quick checks.
That way, I can keep the lens in manual. This is very important. Don't rely on the autofocus. Ever.
Get to know about 'hyperfocal distance' - a point on your lens at which everything is in focus from a yard to infinity (wide, mid aperture, use the Lens Info scale). Get the sock magnifier so you can SEE when you've got focus. Get used to knowing instinctively which way to tug the lens, and by how much, when your subjects move. Learn to spot the identifiers of sharp focus, know when to zoom in, twiddle, zoom out (of course you've checked your back-focus!).
At its ultimate best, auto focus is handing over control of focus to a trained labrador. Clever, but the brains behind it isn't working for you. I have been handed rushes by EX1 shooters who use Auto Focus, and I'll show you sharp backgrounds and blurry interviewees. T'was ever thus - every camera with auto focus hunts out areas of high contrast and tries to twiddle the focus to see if the transition between light and dark shrinks if you spin one way, and if it gets worse, spins the other way. Once it's done, rinse and repeat, so hence drifting focus.
It's not worth the hassle.
The EX1 has one huge advantage over its brethren - its half inch chip makes DoF shallower, so it's easier to get the shot in focus. That's part of the reason why I ditched the Z1. USE the image magnifier, learn to spot which way to tweak the lens.
You don't NEED auto focus!
Once you're happy with the camera, you won't WANT auto focus. Even for Run & Gun.
But the nurse says I must rest now...
Jay Gladwell December 19th, 2008, 10:15 AM Vincent, according to your profile you had Premiere 2.0. Glad to hear you've upgraded.
I don't have Premiere Pro, so I'm in no position to be of any real help to you.
Sorry!
John Hedgecoe December 19th, 2008, 10:23 AM Don't use autofocus - EVER. It just doesn't work. Too much hunting.
Switch the lens to full manual and turn on peaking.
As for ergonomics, yup, it sucks. I hold the camera by the grip and use my left hand under the body to support it. That works for me.
SD for DVD, I edit in full HD, render the final to HD and pass the HD file to DVD Architect and let it do the downconversion. Seems to work well for me.
Great camera once you get used to it.
Bruno Demeocq December 19th, 2008, 10:30 AM No problem for run&gun. I like to use it with the manfrotto 560B. On the soil or in the belt for "steadystyle " movement.
Jason Davenport December 19th, 2008, 11:51 AM This works great for run and gun. From Cavision.
Ned Soltz December 19th, 2008, 12:30 PM Best set up for run and gun on EX-1, in my book, is the DVMultiRig Pro. I have also used the DVRig Junior with a great deal of success.
Adam Reuter December 19th, 2008, 03:54 PM Run and gun with the EX1 is fine. I've shot concerts, a wedding, and a reality show with it. And like Matt said get used to using manual focus. The Peaking and Expanded Focus features along with the high resolution LCD screen make for relatively easy (compared to other prosumer models) focus.
Using DSLR cameras helps you get in the mindset of "if I or the subject move and I need a closeup the focus must change." I am checking focus probably 3 times a minute when doing run and gun or whenever a "setup" changes and I am not all the way zoomed out.
Robert Young December 19th, 2008, 06:20 PM I shoot almost all run n' gun. It's hard for me to hold the bare camera steady, but with a "U-Grip" ( Ugrip - Gallery (http://ugrip.bellcom.dk/?pid=1,13&gallery) ) handle on the left side it's very steady & easy to manage. I'll use autofocus for "scenery", particularly in bright light, but for any foreground subject (talking head, etc.) manual focus is necessary. By the way, the full manual focus with hard stops is a brilliant feature of the EX. I don't think any other camera in this price range has it
Perrone Ford December 19th, 2008, 07:08 PM The other more important thing to consider is how well it converts HD into SD (for DVD).
I still can't fathom how people lay blame for this on a camera. It has NOTHING to do with a downconversion. That's to whatever tool you use to downconvert. My SD footage is stunning from my EX1.
Vincent Oliver December 19th, 2008, 11:49 PM I still can't fathom how people lay blame for this on a camera. It has NOTHING to do with a downconversion. That's to whatever tool you use to downconvert. My SD footage is stunning from my EX1.
I am not blaming the camera, although I think Sony could have provided better information on how to acheive quality SD footage - for the time being most of my work will still be SD - DVD output. Yes, I know perhaps the Z7 may have been a better choice for this, but the EX3 is my ideal camera, and it will do me for the next 5 or more years.
Perrone Ford December 19th, 2008, 11:52 PM I am not blaming the camera, although I think Sony could have provided better information on how to acheive quality SD footage
How? How would Sony know the tools you use? I just made a new post regarding this.
Vincent Oliver December 20th, 2008, 12:10 AM Good point Perrone,
Of course Sony would not know all the tools we are using. I would have expected some guidelines though, most people are still wanting to output to DVD.
I guess I am still a bit frustrated with the SD quality, at the moment I can't use the footage, it is not good enough. THis is not a fault of the camera, just me trying to acheive a perfect result so I can justify the £6000 I have just spent on the camera. I start filming on the 5th January for my next DVD project, so I have a couple of weeks to get it all right - I have every confidence that it will be superb. When I acheive it, I will post a workflow for other people who have the same problem.
Perrone Ford December 20th, 2008, 12:18 AM Can you post your current workflow?
I am especially interested in the tool you use to get from 1080 to 480, and in the tool you use to go from your source format to mpeg2. I am interested in where the losses are occuring, or if its an accumulation of issues.
Brian Mills December 20th, 2008, 12:26 AM Vincent:
Definitely rent the camera before you buy it and take it out for a spin.
I bought an EX-1 a month ago and after shooting with it - I really don't like it.
Its pretty good for 1080i, but for 24P, the image gets REALLY soft unless you pan REALLY SLOW. I'm not sure what you shoot your weddings in, just FYI.
Now, I will get verbally fragged for saying this on this forum, but its true and other pro videographers that I work with feel the same way.
And people will tell you its a "24P thing" and that you're panning too fast, but nay, I've shot on every HDV camera out there and even an F900 in 24P and NEVER saw the same effect.
Also, the auto focus BLOWS. Now, many people will tell you you don't need auto focus, and in a full-size camera rig I'd agree, but for handy cams (and let no man say this is NOT a handy cam in design), I like a good auto focus SOMETIMES (I've shot many weddings and there are times when its just nice to have). On this camera NEVER, EVER trust the auto focus (and contrary to what some may say, the Z1 was an HD camera and had a perfectly acceptable auto focus).
And the form factor absolutely DOES NOT WORK for hand held unless you pay an additional $650 or so for a shoulder rig.
Now, this camera can get some awesome footage to be sure, but I think it is more suited for controlled, cinematic situations than truly run-and-gun shooting (which weddings are).
Now, I am not a shill for any company, I am an EX-1 owner and a professional videographer and this is my opinion....
Vincent Oliver December 20th, 2008, 01:55 AM EUREKA, have solved the HD to SD problem.
I will/have post the workflow in the thread HD to SD downconversion
Jeroen Wolf December 20th, 2008, 05:33 AM The ergonomics aren't perfect, but you get around them. What works for me is the Hood-pro sock magnifier and an odd Vulcan Nerve Pinch left handed grip round the lens hood, with the right hand wodging the whole affair into the shoulder. Then there's the magnified view for quick checks.
That way, I can keep the lens in manual. This is very important. Don't rely on the autofocus. Ever.
Get to know about 'hyperfocal distance' - a point on your lens at which everything is in focus from a yard to infinity (wide, mid aperture, use the Lens Info scale). Get the sock magnifier so you can SEE when you've got focus. Get used to knowing instinctively which way to tug the lens, and by how much, when your subjects move. Learn to spot the identifiers of sharp focus, know when to zoom in, twiddle, zoom out (of course you've checked your back-focus!).
I have an EX1 since a few weeks and am obviously still learning. I come from a Z1 and was used to (manually) focussing on an object a meter away and that way everything from 1 to 10 meters was in focus. Ideal for uncontrolled situations. Not so with this camera.
I really miss the temporary autofocus feature from the Z1.(why did they mess with that very useful function??!! Zoom in, push the temp autofocus button-always spot on-release the button and it keeps focus, zoom out. Sony: please have that feature return as an option for a custom button in the next firmware!)
Matt, I am curious to hear what you mean when suggesting to use the sock magnifier. While you're running around shooting? From a tripod? I have one but haven't used it yet. I don't like the idea of not being able to instantly see the LCD for composition when I walk around & shoot with the camera. Why not just use expanded focus? (even though I don't like that function either -as of yet- because it takes a few seconds during which you can't check composition. Maybe just another thing to get used to...)
Jeroen
ps I use the Varizoom LSP shoulderbrace and it is great. Used it for the Z1 and now for the EX1. I would never shoot handheld with the EX1 unless I need some unusual angles...
Perrone Ford December 20th, 2008, 09:01 AM I come from a Z1 and was used to (manually) focussing on an object a meter away and that way everything from 1 to 10 meters was in focus. Ideal for uncontrolled situations. Not so with this camera.
Stop the lens down. Problem solved.
I really miss the temporary autofocus feature from the Z1.(why did they mess with that very useful function??!! Zoom in, push the temp autofocus button-always spot on-release the button and it keeps focus, zoom out. Sony: please have that feature return as an option for a custom button in the next firmware!)
Put camera into manual focus, push button that says autofocus. Make sure that lens is not in full manual mode.
Jeroen Wolf December 20th, 2008, 09:38 AM Stop the lens down. Problem solved.
Put camera into manual focus, push button that says autofocus. Make sure that lens is not in full manual mode.
Stopping down the lens in effect would mean underexposing, right? (that is, if you don't want to change shutter and gain) Or use the ND-filter when there's lots of light.
But what if you're fully open? Can you give examples how this would work in practice? Say you're following a person in a building and he's going in and out of rooms with different amounts of light available... Do you use this technique?
Autofocus on the EX1:
I understood from the Doug Jensen instruction dvd that the autofocus button is essentially different from the one on the Z1 and that it should be avoided. The difference being that autofocus doesn't stop after you release the button but continues to hunt untill it decides it's got the focus right. That, as mr Jensen says (and I fullheartedly agree) is unacceptable.
Perrone Ford December 20th, 2008, 10:08 AM Stopping down the lens in effect would mean underexposing, right? (that is, if you don't want to change shutter and gain) Or use the ND-filter when there's lots of light.
But what if you're fully open? Can you give examples how this would work in practice? Say you're following a person in a building and he's going in and out of rooms with different amounts of light available... Do you use this technique?
If you are fully open because you HAVE to be then you have to accept the depth you get. However, I would submit that if you are fully open on the EX1 you'd be gained up on the Z1 because it doesn't gather as much light in it's smaller chips anyway. So gaining up on the EX1 should put you back ahead of the game, and then you can close the iris down a stop or so. I don't need to run-and-gun my camera so I can't say. But if I were, I'd probably be gained up +6 or so, maybe more, and then cleaning up the footage in post. If I was using the EXx in an ENG type of way.
Autofocus on the EX1:
I understood from the Doug Jensen instruction dvd that the autofocus button is essentially different from the one on the Z1 and that it should be avoided. The difference being that autofocus doesn't stop after you release the button but continues to hunt untill it decides it's got the focus right. That, as mr Jensen says (and I fullheartedly agree) is unacceptable.
Interesting. I'll have to test this. I tend to not use or need autofocus for what I do, and I am not familiar with the Z1 at all.
Erik Phairas December 20th, 2008, 01:15 PM EUREKA, have solved the HD to SD problem.
I will/have post the workflow in the thread HD to SD downconversion
can't find the post... link?
Vincent Oliver December 20th, 2008, 02:40 PM can't find the post... link?
Here is the link, second post
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/sony-xdcam-ex-cinealta/139991-hd-sd-downconversion.html
Matt Davis December 21st, 2008, 04:36 AM Matt, I am curious to hear what you mean when suggesting to use the sock magnifier. While you're running around shooting? From a tripod? I have one but haven't used it yet.
The Sock Magnifier is officially known as the Hood Pro. I bought one after trying Philip Bloom's one at a conference.
Philip Bloom Blog Archive How to make EX1 LCD BETTER than EX3 viewfinder (http://philipbloom.co.uk/2008/10/22/how-to-make-ex1-lcd-better-than-ex3-viewfinder/)
What it does and how it works is covered by reviews by Mr Bloom and other esteemed web sources. What I will add is that using a Sock Magnifier in Run & Gun means I can keep the EX1 at eye level, keep an eye on focus, pull focus reliably and enjoy slightly more stable shots in hand held mode.
It's not perfect - I've stopped using it on a tripod, for example. It's too much hassle for talking head interviews. But for pseudo-shoulder stuff, it's brilliant. The extra touch of stability is handy, too.
One thing though: if you're tempted, buy the black version! I bought the cheerful Orange/Blue combo, and got a comment on a recent job that it stood out too much.
|
|