Jacques E. Bouchard
December 13th, 2008, 03:57 PM
I'm looking at doing a feature with a very low budget for 2009, with ACTRA or UdA actors (the Canadian equivalent of SAG). At full scale, actors alone would cost $40,000 (8 actors, 10 extras, average of 10 full days), which is half of my intended budget, so I've been looking at deferrals. Problem is, neither unions have anything equivalent to SAG's agreement for low-budget features - the best you'll get is 50% deferred from the former, and 25% from the latter. However, for the benefit of (eventually) paying full fees, you have to share a much higher percentage of your profits, and UdA even limits the producer's gains to 20% of the budget!! (although I'm sure a creative accountant could take care of that).
I know a lot of small independent productions use union actors all the time, as there seems to be a grey area where you can pay less than scale without you or the actors getting in trouble. but no one's talking and the union reps sure as hell aren't going to tell me the loopholes.
Has anyone had experience working with ACTRA or UdA actors on a small budget film? Any advice you can offer?
I know a lot of small independent productions use union actors all the time, as there seems to be a grey area where you can pay less than scale without you or the actors getting in trouble. but no one's talking and the union reps sure as hell aren't going to tell me the loopholes.
Has anyone had experience working with ACTRA or UdA actors on a small budget film? Any advice you can offer?