Michel Perez
August 2nd, 2008, 03:12 PM
Hi, I've got my HV10 for almost a year now and always tought its FOV was too narrow.
I'm a noob in all this video/photo stuff, so I don't really know what kind of lens is a good buy for me. (I'm not shooting anything for commercial use, just personal use).
Is the Canon WD-H37C worth?.
Thanks in advance.
Lee Wilson
August 2nd, 2008, 11:21 PM
Raynox 5050 = good. Search this forum for HV10 + wide angle.
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41Uyo6Bgs7L._SL500_AA280_.jpg
Michel Perez
August 3rd, 2008, 10:35 AM
Raynox 5050 = good. Search this forum for HV10 + wide angle.
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41Uyo6Bgs7L._SL500_AA280_.jpg
I read this causes vigneting on HV10, but I also found some captures which didn't show vigneting at all.
So to sum up, Raynox 5050 or Canon WD-H37C?
Axel Scheffler
August 3rd, 2008, 06:45 PM
I read this causes vigneting on HV10, but I also found some captures which didn't show vigneting at all.
So to sum up, Raynox 5050 or Canon WD-H37C?
I have the Canon part and I'm pretty happy with it. It doubles the weight of the cam but since it is so light weight I think it helps to hold it still. NO vignetting over the full zoom, practically it's on all the time.
Axel, San Jose
Lou Bruno
August 3rd, 2008, 06:51 PM
I purchased the original CANON wide angle and have been very pleased with the quality of the picture.
Lee Wilson
August 3rd, 2008, 11:14 PM
I read this causes vigneting on HV10, but I also found some captures which didn't show vigneting at all.
So to sum up, Raynox 5050 or Canon WD-H37C?
The 5050 can have slight vignetting if you leave the plastic 37mm <> 37mm adaptor ring in place - the trade off is with this ring removed the back of the 5050 can touch the HV10's built in lens cap - but this has caused me zero problems in real world use.
http://img278.imageshack.us/img278/4316/wideez0.jpg