Jack Kelly
May 3rd, 2008, 01:31 AM
Hi there,
We've shoot a project on a Sony F900R HDCAM camera shooting 25PsF. When we come to ingest the tapes by connecting an HDCAM deck to my Decklink HD Extreme, should we use these settings in NEO HD HDLink (I'm on WinXP Pro SP2):
1920x1080 10bit
progressive scan
don't de-interlace
quality = high
To take each one of these settings and my thinking behind them:
1920x1080 10bit
HDCAM records 1440x1080 8-bit to tape which would, at first glance, mean that ingesting as 1920x1080 10-bit would be overkill. However, the HDCAM deck up-converts from 1440x1080 to 1920x1080 to send over the HD-SDI pipe. So I'd rather not do a second spatial conversion back to 1440x1080 in the computer. Am I correct to assume that converting from 1920x1080 back to 1440x1080 would harm the image?.
I'm eager to use 10-bit because we're going to do quite a lot of grading which might mean several trips back and forth between various applications and banding is a thing of the devil.
progressive scan
The camera is set to record 25psf so I assume I should tell HDLink to ingest as progressive scan.
don't de-interlace
I've experimented with ingesting 25PsF HDCAM footage either with HDLink's de-interlacer on or with it off. It seems that the footage ingested with the de-interlacer off is a touch sharper. Is the de-interlacer throwing away some vertical resolution?
quality=high
HDCAM is really rather "lossy". I assume that using a higher quality cineform setting than "high" is unnecessary because HDCAM has lost a fair bit of information. Of course, if we were shooting direct to Cineform then we'd pick Filmscan 1 or maybe Filmscan 2. Also, we shoot with a Pro35 adapter which slightly softens the image so there isn't a huge amount of high frequency detail. Oh, and we're not going to be doing any green-screen although we might do a little bit of motion tracking when we come to do the grade.
Any thoughts would be most welcome!
Many thanks,
Jack
We've shoot a project on a Sony F900R HDCAM camera shooting 25PsF. When we come to ingest the tapes by connecting an HDCAM deck to my Decklink HD Extreme, should we use these settings in NEO HD HDLink (I'm on WinXP Pro SP2):
1920x1080 10bit
progressive scan
don't de-interlace
quality = high
To take each one of these settings and my thinking behind them:
1920x1080 10bit
HDCAM records 1440x1080 8-bit to tape which would, at first glance, mean that ingesting as 1920x1080 10-bit would be overkill. However, the HDCAM deck up-converts from 1440x1080 to 1920x1080 to send over the HD-SDI pipe. So I'd rather not do a second spatial conversion back to 1440x1080 in the computer. Am I correct to assume that converting from 1920x1080 back to 1440x1080 would harm the image?.
I'm eager to use 10-bit because we're going to do quite a lot of grading which might mean several trips back and forth between various applications and banding is a thing of the devil.
progressive scan
The camera is set to record 25psf so I assume I should tell HDLink to ingest as progressive scan.
don't de-interlace
I've experimented with ingesting 25PsF HDCAM footage either with HDLink's de-interlacer on or with it off. It seems that the footage ingested with the de-interlacer off is a touch sharper. Is the de-interlacer throwing away some vertical resolution?
quality=high
HDCAM is really rather "lossy". I assume that using a higher quality cineform setting than "high" is unnecessary because HDCAM has lost a fair bit of information. Of course, if we were shooting direct to Cineform then we'd pick Filmscan 1 or maybe Filmscan 2. Also, we shoot with a Pro35 adapter which slightly softens the image so there isn't a huge amount of high frequency detail. Oh, and we're not going to be doing any green-screen although we might do a little bit of motion tracking when we come to do the grade.
Any thoughts would be most welcome!
Many thanks,
Jack