Bob Benkosky
July 14th, 2003, 12:16 AM
I have not seen many people on here mention the fact that a film like quality for video isn't always a good thing. If you get used to video, it looks more realistic and is far less harsh on the eyes than watching a movie in a theater with a crappy projector.
Pure and simple, if I watch a DVD transferred from film, of course, like say Pearl Harbor or something over-produced, it's much easier to sit thru than in the theater. At least for me. I guess this is because it's been made to work with our TV sets. Duh! It's not being projected. Cool!
In film school they teach you that you are essentially in the dark for 50% of the film because as each frame passes by you are seeing the frame seperations.....or whatever. Although 1 movie frame is alot bigger, it's still all relative. I'd guess 35% though.
I'm all for going from shooting the movie in normal mode to 24p, and I admit there's something to it. However, it's not being projected either which already makes it better imo.
Another thing.....Lighting is everything, just like everyone says and Hollywood flicks don't have to cheap out, have every kind of gadget available, which alot of us don't. That hurt's the "film-like" look right there. Hey, worst case scenario.... You want to make a movie and only have 2 people to act, and film the project. Can it look good??? Maybe some of it can, but it cannot certainly be your true vision unless you love tripod shots and never showing 2 people interact while having a moving camera. It does pay to have a lot of friends, hopefully that share the same interest too.
I was wondering something......
What's the difference between 24p (2-3 pulldown or 2-3-3-2) at least I think that's the only options in Vegas 4.0 right now. Or you can choose just to print it back to DV without the 24p option.
Oh I also noticed a horrible effect when you shoot in MOVIE MODE and add 24p 2-3-3-2. It's very, very blurry. It's like watching a movie on an old 1970's projector with wobbly heads.
It looks ok on the small computer screen, but when it's on the tube.....yikes.
Pure and simple, if I watch a DVD transferred from film, of course, like say Pearl Harbor or something over-produced, it's much easier to sit thru than in the theater. At least for me. I guess this is because it's been made to work with our TV sets. Duh! It's not being projected. Cool!
In film school they teach you that you are essentially in the dark for 50% of the film because as each frame passes by you are seeing the frame seperations.....or whatever. Although 1 movie frame is alot bigger, it's still all relative. I'd guess 35% though.
I'm all for going from shooting the movie in normal mode to 24p, and I admit there's something to it. However, it's not being projected either which already makes it better imo.
Another thing.....Lighting is everything, just like everyone says and Hollywood flicks don't have to cheap out, have every kind of gadget available, which alot of us don't. That hurt's the "film-like" look right there. Hey, worst case scenario.... You want to make a movie and only have 2 people to act, and film the project. Can it look good??? Maybe some of it can, but it cannot certainly be your true vision unless you love tripod shots and never showing 2 people interact while having a moving camera. It does pay to have a lot of friends, hopefully that share the same interest too.
I was wondering something......
What's the difference between 24p (2-3 pulldown or 2-3-3-2) at least I think that's the only options in Vegas 4.0 right now. Or you can choose just to print it back to DV without the 24p option.
Oh I also noticed a horrible effect when you shoot in MOVIE MODE and add 24p 2-3-3-2. It's very, very blurry. It's like watching a movie on an old 1970's projector with wobbly heads.
It looks ok on the small computer screen, but when it's on the tube.....yikes.