Stephen Eastwood
April 17th, 2008, 05:55 PM
I have all those and an xlh1 and sony ex cam sitting here so leaving out the sony any tests people woudl like to have me run to see the file differences?
I just checked and it seems the base iso of the HF10 is about the same as the HG10 and HV20 which is around 100-120 iso the XHA1, XLH1 are 320 equivalent and the sony was 400 at 1080 and almost 800 at 720P mode which I never use really.
I like the fact that the HF is so much smaller and lighter and more battery efficient than the HG10 was.
The same work around applies to control exposure, shutter and gain you do need to enable the digital photo while in video mode to activate it and it also lets you see the shutter and aperture when you press the photo button.
Sadly, like the HG10 there are no zebras or sd crop line markers.
My hg10 screen is much brighter by default.
I just checked and it seems the base iso of the HF10 is about the same as the HG10 and HV20 which is around 100-120 iso the XHA1, XLH1 are 320 equivalent and the sony was 400 at 1080 and almost 800 at 720P mode which I never use really.
I like the fact that the HF is so much smaller and lighter and more battery efficient than the HG10 was.
The same work around applies to control exposure, shutter and gain you do need to enable the digital photo while in video mode to activate it and it also lets you see the shutter and aperture when you press the photo button.
Sadly, like the HG10 there are no zebras or sd crop line markers.
My hg10 screen is much brighter by default.