View Full Version : Need recommendation for live AND recorded HD camcorder.


Yi Fong Yu
March 27th, 2008, 12:45 PM
hi folx =D need some help!

my church is beginning to expand their multimedia production. we've got around $1,000 budget. we're looking @things like the Sony hard disk HD cams and Canon HV30's.

here is what we're thinking about doing:
1. create ~5min. HD clips for church service quickly.
2. live broadcast to CCTV/web/studio mediums (balanced XLR plugs?)

Questions:
1. i've found that hard drive HD cams seem to leave out firewire. are there hard drive HD cams WITH firewire? i know that USB is used to make the internal hard drive act like a USB hard drive and then you transfer the footage to PC for editing. if there is a firewire, it'd make the transfer things a bit faster depending on disk speed.

2. tape or hard disk-based solution? tape means u get the firewire solution, good for live broadcasts.

3. i know that our needs for #2 can get expensive. are there accessory items here:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/category/2390/Production_Equipment_Accessories_Live_Studio_Broadcast.html
^that is cheap but effective @broadcasting feeds to various media sources live?

one specific need we have now is to connect a camcorder via firewire to an iMac and broadcast that over front screen projectors. that distance between cam and iMac can be 100FT+. how do we solve this? i'd hate to go back to composite/S-Video/analog cables. there are no analog inputs for the iMac anyways, only firewire. no expansion port either. most firewire cables are under 15FT. i believe the MAX length in the spec for IEEE 1394 is only 30 FEET. are there wireless solutions? i'm no that familiar with live broadcast solutions using consumer cams. we have no budget for prosumer+ grade cams.

Robert M Wright
March 29th, 2008, 12:18 PM
You might look at AVCHD camcorders (that record to flash memory). Decent software (for computers) to support AVCHD should be coming along pretty soon now (now that Panasonic is going to be shipping prosumer AVCHD cameras this year).

Firewire 400 isn't really any faster than USB 2. Actually USB tops out at 480mbps and firewire 400 at 400mbps (if I recall correctly). There are firewire repeaters to enable longer runs, and I've also seen firewire to CAT5 (and back) converters on the web (somewhere).

Frankly, $1000 isn't a whole lot to work with, for what it sounds like you want to do. I'd pass that collection plate around again.

Robert M Wright
March 29th, 2008, 12:28 PM
Say, if you just want a live feed from a camera displayed by the projector (without switching between cameras or anything that would really require other hardware like a computer), you could run HDMI straight from a camera to the projector (if the projector has an HDMI port).

Colin McDonald
March 29th, 2008, 12:37 PM
Firewire 400 isn't really any faster than USB 2. Actually USB tops out at 480mbps and firewire 400 at 400mbps (if I recall correctly).

Ah but Firewire is a SUSTAINED transfer rate of 400 mbps but USB2 is a PEAK transfer of 480 or whatever. So Firewire is better (or would be were it not for the daft connector design).

Am I mistaken in this? Please correct me if I have misunderstood the theory.

Robert M Wright
March 29th, 2008, 12:45 PM
I haven't really tested carefully (maybe somebody has). I haven't noticed a difference though.

Colin McDonald
March 29th, 2008, 01:10 PM
I haven't really tested carefully (maybe somebody has). I haven't noticed a difference though.

Neither have I to be honest, but I have always understood it's because USB2 transfers have to be managed by te CPU whereas Firewire devices have their own chipset. Just for fun i googled a bit and found:

http://www.everythingusb.com/usb2/faq.htm


4. How fast is USB 2.0?
USB 2.0 has a raw data rate at 480Mbps, and it is rated 40 times faster than its predecessor interface, USB 1.1, which tops at 12Mbps. Originally, USB 2.0 was intended to go only as fast as 240Mbps, but in October 1999, USB 2.0 Promoter Group pumped up the speed to 480Mbps.

As far as we know, effective rate reaches at 40MBps or 320Mbps for bulk transfer on a USB 2.0 hard drive with no one else is sharing the bus. Flash Drives seem to be catching up too with the some hitting 30MB/s milestone. For all we know, USB interface could become become the bottleneck for flash drives as early as 2008.

Sorry Yi Fong Yu, none of this is of much use in heping with your question.

Robert M Wright
March 29th, 2008, 05:32 PM
my church is beginning to expand their multimedia production. we've got around $1,000 budget. we're looking @things like the Sony hard disk HD cams and Canon HV30's.

here is what we're thinking about doing:
1. create ~5min. HD clips for church service quickly.
2. live broadcast to CCTV/web/studio mediums (balanced XLR plugs?)


It just occurred to me, that if you want high definition recording to a hard drive (inside a camera), it's going to be AVCHD, unless you get a JVC product (MPEG2). The Canon HV30 doesn't have a hard drive inside (nor do any of Sony's HDV cameras).

If you want quick shoot and edit (without tethering a camera to a computer while shooting), I don't see any advantage to recording AVCHD onto an in-camera hard drive, when you can simply record to a class 6 SDHC flash memory card (and real cheap).

I don't know if you can get a live AVCHD feed out of currently sold cameras or not, but I would like to find out.

Yi Fong Yu
March 29th, 2008, 06:04 PM
we've done tests w/both and the sony sr5 doesn't have firewire. only USB.

the live feed needs to come back into the computer because we want to overlay text over the live feed.

the current temporary solution is output composite rca from a camcorder -> another DV camcorder that accepts analog input then spits it out via firewire->iMac.

are there better solutions? the iMac isn't expandable

Robert M Wright
March 29th, 2008, 07:45 PM
I'm confused. I thought you wanted live HD.

Robert M Wright
March 29th, 2008, 08:14 PM
I guess I'm doubly confused as to why you would take RCA composite output from a camcorder and route it through a DV camcorder, rather than simply shoot with the DV camcorder.

Bill Koehler
March 30th, 2008, 11:56 AM
Mr. Yi Fong Yu has so far told us:

His current setup is:
1. A Std. Def. camcorder upfront in the sanctuary shooting video.
2. He has a composite cable running from there back to where his iMac is.
This because the cable run is 100+ feet and that's the only way he can
get his signal from up front to way in the back.
3. He has a 2nd camcorder doing composite video to DV/Firewire conversion
next to his iMac so he can get the video into the iMac, and do his
overlays. The iMac has roughly zero allowance for expansion, so that's
what he has to do.
4. His iMac in turn directly drives some over front screen projectors.

He would like to upgrade to high definition. That requires:
1. That upfront Std. Def. camcorder obviously gets replaced by an HD camcorder of some kind.
2. That composite cable running from way up front to the back is no longer going to cut it. The most obvious solution would be to run FireWire directly from the upfront HD camcorder, if possible. This would also eliminate the 2nd camcorder doing composite video to DV/Firewire conversion.

But normal Firewire cables appear to max out at ~15 feet, far short of the 100+ feet that he needs.

Did I miss anything Mr. Yi Fong Yu?

The best I can suggest is to do a web search using "Firewire Extenders". I don't know if you like the price but two solutions that popped up were:

http://www.gefen.com/kvm/product.jsp?prod_id=2808

http://www.kvmgalore.com/shopping/category.php?category_id=326&group_id=78&category_name=XTENDEX+Firewire&kartSess=7c680d0e0f7ef0565ec8ade3f45dd2af

I know nothing about these vendors. I am using them strictly as examples.

In either case, for what you are trying to do with FireWire, it appears you are going to need some kind of fiber optic backbone to get from here to there.

What I do know is fiber optic cable is far, far less tolerant of physical abuse than almost any kind of wire, so you may have to factor in the cost of some kind of conduit enclosure for the cable.

As for the camcorder, something like a Sony HC7/HC9 or Canon HV30 would appear to be the way to go. They are tape based machines with FireWire ports to tap into for your HDV/FireWire signal. From what I read, the HV30 has better low light performance, important for indoor shooting. The Sony HC7/HC9 allow for an external LANC focus/zoom controller. I personally have a LANC controller for another Sony camcorder and love it. I can hardly imagine going back to being without it.

My 2 cents. Hope it helps.

Robert M Wright
March 30th, 2008, 01:33 PM
Ok, now I see why the RCA cable is being used (duh - dense me), to run the 100' from camera to computer.

Specs for firewire say something like a 15' max for cabling without a repeater (if I recall correctly). I've used 25' firewire cable successfully though. I'm not an electrical engineer, but I wouldn't be surprised if you could get good enough cable to run 100' (might get pricey though). I believe it's basically just a matter of using heavy enough gauge wire (to have low enough resistance) and good shielding (again, I'm not an expert on that).

Bill Koehler
March 31st, 2008, 03:28 AM
There is more to it than that. I did find a manufacturer that made 33 foot FireWire cables, but they cautioned that they would not work in every instance.

Given his application, it is already getting expensive. The two options I referenced before are most of $1K, which would require a doubling of his budget + more $ for conduit enclosure.

This should do the same job for about half the price (400 Mb/s):

http://www.usbfirewire.com/Parts/rr-fw-cat5-s400.html

even cheaper (100 Mb/s):

http://www.usbfirewire.com/Parts/rr-fw-cat5.html

Given that it uses networking cable, it shouldn't be quite as physically fragile as the fiber optic solutions. And if even so the cable gets crunched, it will be far cheaper to replace.

Yi Fong Yu
March 31st, 2008, 07:58 AM
how do TV studio run their cables. i imagine that they use hd-sdi outputs? what kind of budgets are required to acquire those things? the sony sr5 has an hdmi output, which can be adapted to sdi-out afaik.

but i'm unaware of any hd-sdi conversions back into firewire unless there is a PCI expansion port, but the imac doesnt have that. i'm sure the TV studios have rigs w/PCI capabilities.

so outside of repeaters+fiber, how else could i run this?

Bill Koehler
March 31st, 2008, 05:33 PM
HD-SDI? I may be wrong, but I believe you are now talking real money.
Canons XH-G1 camcorder has it and little else over the XH-A1.
Yes I know that camcorder is well out of your price range.
My point is they charge a $3000 premium for HD-SDI to be there.

I personally would go with the 100 Mb/s FireWire<-->Cat5e<--> FireWire solution I mentioned above.

It's cost, including cable(s), appears to be under $400.
I think that will be very hard to beat for a long cable run HD solution.
Regardless of what your (preliminary) budget may be.

It should handle 25 Mb/s DV or HDV with no problem whatsoever.
You could test it out by swapping out your current composite cable and
2nd camcorder doing the DV/FireWire conversion with it.
Your video quality should immediatly improve thanks to you eliminating a level of analog to digital conversion.

And once you're happy that it really works, then go upgrade the camcorder as well.

Daniel Browning
March 31st, 2008, 06:48 PM
HV30: $899.
100 feet of RCA component video cable: $32.97
BlackMagic Intensity Pro: $329
Uncompressed high definition recording: priceless


A component distribution amp ($100+), or the Intensity Pro itself would let you send the signal to the projector as well. At our church we convert component video to an RGB VGA (d-sub) signal, run it into the 4x4 switcher, then distribute to three projectors.

My personal experience with firewire is such that it has enough problems without adding third-party extenders (cat5, etc.).

Bill Koehler
March 31st, 2008, 08:41 PM
Would work for me, also :-)

But as a note: Mr. Yi Fong Yu is going to need a new computer as this won't be able to plug into his iMac. His iMac has no slots, PCIe or otherwise, or did I miss something?

Daniel Browning
March 31st, 2008, 08:53 PM
Would work for me, also :-)

But as a note: Mr. Yi Fong Yu is going to need a new computer as this won't be able to plug into his iMac. His iMac has no slots, PCIe or otherwise, or did I miss something?

You're right. Not to mention a hard drive fast enough for recording (especially if the computer would be used for something else at the same time).

Anyway, firewire should not be used for live display; the immense delay is intolerable for front-screen projectors.

Bill Koehler
March 31st, 2008, 10:36 PM
Anyway, firewire should not be used for live display; the immense delay is intolerable for front-screen projectors.

I am curious about this. Is the delay because of something in the FireWire itself, or the inherent encode/decode delay when handling Long GOP HDV?

Daniel Browning
March 31st, 2008, 10:48 PM
I am curious about this. Is the delay because of something in the FireWire itself, or the inherent encode/decode delay when handling Long GOP HDV?

It's not FireWire itself. HDV is 15-per-GOP, so you have at least a half-second there, but most cameras (like my XH A1) take a little longer than that.

Bill Koehler
March 31st, 2008, 11:07 PM
With the elimination of FireWire though, it would appear that a cheap solution for Mr. Yi Fong Yu is gone.

But at least he now knows what it's really going to take, and why.

Yi Fong Yu
April 1st, 2008, 10:31 AM
hi Bill+everyone,

thx4 all ur suggestions! =D.

i think we're going to go with the cat5e/6 solution. the cost of fiber is a bit out of the price range. copper is perfect for this application. i knew about repeaters and knew of catxx solutions but i never put the 2 together =P. in the custom HT arena, they run cat5 for everything from hdmi to speaker cables.

with response to sdi, i was just curious how studios run things that's all =D. i know it gets expensive quick, but you are correct, that's definitely outside of our budget currently. one related question to that is:
will an HD cam w/firewire look BETTER than SD cam w/firewire? i thought there were bandwidth limitations to firewire? haven't time to play w/it yet even though i know it can capture 1920x1080 in any frame-rate.

dan, that's quite out of our current price range, but it would have been nice4sure =D.

as for the reason why we need to input the feed into the iMac, we're using ProPresenter for worship text overlays and other things. it's sort of doubles as a live studio video mixing console currently for jumpbacks, txt, video, audio and so on.

the back of the iMac also includes a fw800 cable. i know there are fw400->fw800 adapters. isn't the 800 spec supposed to include 30meter 100feet runs? i don't see any cables.

Bill Koehler
April 1st, 2008, 09:33 PM
hi Bill+everyone,

thx4 all ur suggestions! =D.

i think we're going to go with the cat5e/6 solution. the cost of fiber is a bit out of the price range. copper is perfect for this application. i knew about repeaters and knew of catxx solutions but i never put the 2 together =P. in the custom HT arena, they run cat5 for everything from hdmi to speaker cables.


Glad I could come up with something for you.


one related question to that is:
will an HD cam w/firewire look BETTER than SD cam w/firewire? i thought there were bandwidth limitations to firewire? haven't time to play w/it yet even though i know it can capture 1920x1080 in any frame-rate.


All the DV and HDV consumer and low-to-mid range professional cams run a 25 Megabit/sec. bitstream. What changes going from DV to HDV is the codec.

Think of DV as being a motion JPEG, where each frame (picture) is its own self contained entity.

HDV on the other hand is built on the MPEG-2 codec, where up to 15 frames are bundled together. Much more computationally intensive to assemble, but it justifies itself by being far more bandwidth efficient.


the back of the iMac also includes a fw800 cable. i know there are fw400->fw800 adapters. isn't the 800 spec supposed to include 30meter 100feet runs? i don't see any cables.

Do not know. Instead I ask the question: If fw400 tops out at 5 meters, is it plausible that its double speed brother would support runs six times as long?
I see the lack of cables as implicit confirmation of what I suspect.

Your milage may vary.

However, I must admit a vested interest.

Most Sundays I am shooting one of my church's services to turn into a DVD for our choirs to use for review, and for shutins.
For special occasions (Christmas, Easter) we setup monitors in our old sanctuary, now the chapel, for the overflow crowd.

To me this looks like a good solution for the cable run over to the chapel.
The fact that there is a slight delay doesn't matter. If you go with this, I am very interested in how it ends up working for you.

Sincerely,
Bill Koehler

Yi Fong Yu
April 1st, 2008, 10:29 PM
i'm going with the cat5. i think that'll work best in this application.

just out of curiosity. how many members in ur church and do u use the video just for the overflow or do u do other things with it?

Bill Koehler
April 2nd, 2008, 10:08 AM
Not sure about the total membership numbers.
I do know the total Sunday Service attendance # is ~1600.

Wednesday evening we have a Wednesday Night Supper + music program.
Around 400 - 500 people show up for that.

Alpharetta First United Methodist Church.

Yi Fong Yu
April 2nd, 2008, 12:38 PM
wow, that total attn is like 8x more than ours =p.

anywho, thx4ur help.