Richard Jones
March 2nd, 2008, 06:26 AM
Hello,
I've been using a Canopus 110 to convert images for previewing on an external monitor and have found this makes the whole editing experience that much more relaxing as well as far more effective when applying an FX or making a colour adjustment.
I now want to transfer analogue (VHS) images to Sony Vegas Pro 8 for re-editing and burning to a DVD. I can capture these from the VCR through the Canopus 110 but would there be any additional benefit in buying and using the Canopus 300 for this purpose? If so what sort of improvements could I expect in return for this additional outlay? Would it counter any loss of quality in the images as they are being transferred?
Many thanks,
Richard Jones
I've been using a Canopus 110 to convert images for previewing on an external monitor and have found this makes the whole editing experience that much more relaxing as well as far more effective when applying an FX or making a colour adjustment.
I now want to transfer analogue (VHS) images to Sony Vegas Pro 8 for re-editing and burning to a DVD. I can capture these from the VCR through the Canopus 110 but would there be any additional benefit in buying and using the Canopus 300 for this purpose? If so what sort of improvements could I expect in return for this additional outlay? Would it counter any loss of quality in the images as they are being transferred?
Many thanks,
Richard Jones