Andrew Dean
February 24th, 2008, 05:55 AM
So, since you've already heard all the comparisons by people that know what they are talking about (or blow hard enough that they seem like they know), I thought I'd offer my observations as a guy that has done post production for 17 years and is buying up production gear so he can fight middle age by making goofy no budget videos with other pseudo-creative folk (and reduce taxes). I have a reasonable ear when it comes to post audio design, but I'm not one of those annoying "golden eared" guys that tries to make other people feel bad for not being able to hear the difference between 16bit/44.1k and 16bit/48k. Also, there are no components in my home stereo that are larger or heavier than a geo metro. I am not a professional soundie, nor an aspiring soundie, even if the opportunity to take that cut in pay and respect arose. (that was a joke. maybe a bit too poignant, but nonetheless a joke. hehe)
Based on the discussions on this forum about cheap/good dialog mics, I bought (amongst a bunch of other stuff) an octava hyper from sound room. On most of the shoots i've helped out with, it has blown away the other mics available (mostly junk shotguns like the atr55, but also "widely regarded" mics like the me66.). But, just as I believed DVinfo forums that the Oktava rocked, I also believed you guys that the Schoeps cmc641 is so much better than the Oktava that it could make a cat urinating on a pie plate sound like angels... uh, urinating on a pie plate. So, I cashed out some of my earnings at istockphoto.com and bought one. (and an advanta-jib, but that will be another story when it arrives).
So after owning the schoeps for around 10 minutes and testing by a/b switching between them as I talk, here are my initial impressions of the two mics from the perspective of someone that does mostly visual production for a living:
1. The box.
First, the schoeps box is bigger. You know, the goofy wooden boxes that expensive mics come in that are too nice to throw away, but too big to actually carry around? The schoeps box is almost twice the size of the Oktava box. Inside the box is the mic with its capsule already attached, in a slot much longer than the mic, so it can slide around and bang the capsule against the foam. The Oktava box has a little extra compartment for the capsule (and spaces for multiple capsules) with everythign fitting nice and snug. I guess part of the thinking is that schoeps capsules are so expensive, you'd never ever be able to buy multiple capsules at the same time, so there are no need for spaces for them. Why the mic is loose to slide around? I guess its tougher than I think.
I guess the bigger box has more "damn, whats in the giant box?" sex appeal, but the Oktava box is small enough that it seems more like something jewelry would come in. I have a wooden box of dominos that is right in between the other two boxes in size, so that could confuse people if I am trying to impress with the box alone. The schoeps box looks nicer, but the Oktava box is made of cedar, so while it doesnt look as fancy, it smells really nice, so for this first criteria I'm going to have to go with Oktava as the superior device.
2. carrying around
The Oktava is so small that it can slide all the way into my rycote BBG and stow that way in my sound bag. It leaves the xlr pins exposed, but the mic is so inexpensive that i just aim the pins down so nothing falls into them and so far its worked out great.
The schoeps is longer by like an inch, so the mic sticks out of the back of the bbg by like 3/4 inch if you try to carry it around that way. In theory that should be fine, but since the schoeps cost more than the truck i'm driving it around in, it seems not good enough.
Does anybody make a padded tube for the schoeps? Like, an oversized cigar tube with foam inside? How do you guys carry your mics around? Do you have a cart for the wooden boxes?
3. Looks.
I got the grey schoeps, so its texture is similar to the oktava, but a bit finer. However, the schoeps looks like they were sober when they painted it. Also, unlike the Oktava, the schoeps looks like they painted the mic exterior before they added the stuff inside.
If you unscrew the top of the Oktava, there are a couple contacts. If you unscrew the schoeps there are concentric rings of like 4 or 5 contacts. I have no idea what they are for, but the schoeps definitely wins for overall cosmetics as well as the number of contacts between the body and capsule.
4. Weight
The Oktava is shorter, but feels heavier. It might not be, but using the highly accurate "jiggling them around in my two hands" technique, the schoeps felt a little bit lighter.
5. Paranoia
One distinct advantage of the Oktava is that you can leave the mic in your closet when you go roller skating and you dont really worry whether or not it will be stolen when you return. Heck, the Oktava is so cheap you could leave the thing on the bus and not be too heartbroken. The schoeps is so expensive it makes me think that everybody is out to steal it. Speaking of which... what exactly are you staring at?
6. Bragging rights
Well. I live in New Zealand, and so far I haven't run into anyone that has heard of either Schoeps or Oktava. In order to impress people I have to first educate them about the two brands, the relative quality difference, then try to impress them with just how insanely expensive the schoeps was without making them think it was a waste of money. So really, unless I run into some north island sound guys, or other DVinfo patrons, the bragging is mostly lost. I can just say "i have a nz$3,000 mic" and they'll say "damn"... but really, i could have just lied and said that about the Oktava.
7. resale value
The Oktava probably holds close to 80% of its original purchase price, so thats pretty good. The schoeps, however, went up in price like $400 the day after i bought it, so thusfar, i think the schoeps has actually appreciated in value.
8. handling noise
I somehow missed all the discussions about handling noise of the schoeps before buying it. For some reason i thought it would have none. It has a tiny bit less handling noise than the Oktava, but not enough to get too excited about that alone. I tried it in my ktek KSSM mount with the soft bands, and while a slightly larger mic than the Oktava, it seemed to dampen down nicely. I'll have to test it more in the wild.
9. the BEST mic
Well, for a couple years I've been hearing schoeps schoeps schoeps by the people that talk a lot on forums. Now that I've bent over and bought the schoeps, everybody is chattering about how the new mkh8040 sounds better. doh!
10. printed materials
The schoeps comes with a brochure/ad for the collete series, plus a warranty card. The Oktava came with a couple graphs, one of which looks like my great aunt's signature and the other like she was trying to draw a circle while overdosing. Since the schoeps didnt come with anything like that, the oktava is superior on this front.
11. The sound quality
I'm always annoyed when people say things like "its subjective depending on your ears" because I really want things to be more concrete than that. Well, here is my honest opinion for sound people to condemn me for...
If i listen to the schoeps for awhile and switch to the Oktava, the Oktava sounds thin and slightly "metallic" in the upper mids. However, If i listen to the Oktava for awhile and switch to the schoeps, the schoeps sounds a little bit heavy on the low end. If i'm doing an audio mix in post, then I have a clear sense of tone and clarity and how well something sits in a mix, but for some reason just a/b testing these two mics, I cant get a baseline that makes one sound infinitely better than the other. Both would certainly be totally serviceable to edit, and I've without a doubt had far worse results than either from "sound professionals."
So I would only do post color grading on a known monitor that has been set up properly and has a neutral environment with appropriate lighting. In that context, i can compare two hues and determine which works better.
I have no idea how to do that with audio, especially outside of a mix. I mean, how do you clear your audio pallete? Do you listen to white noise for awhile? I could never grade color while wearing sunglasses or in a room with natural light that changes throughout the day. What exactly are people using as a base for "natural"?
Conclusion:
Um. people way more gifted (obsessed?) with audio (or at least, talking about it) say that the schoeps sounds way better... so I have no reason to doubt that it does. However, neither mic sounds "bad" the way an atr55 or me66 does to me.
I should do a double blind test between the schoeps and oktava to determine just how uncivilized my ears really are.
I suppose the beauty here is that I really dont need to believe. As long as I send the schoeps through my sound devices mixer into a 24 bit recorder, (and use good boom technique) then my interior dialog in theory should sound great.
...at least, it will sound great until people decide the 8040 sounds SO much better, and some new field mixer/preamp with super-oxygenated battery terminals comes along and suddenly my rig will sound like dookie.
So thats my unqualified opinion. I hope you found it helpful in some way.
cheers,
-a
Based on the discussions on this forum about cheap/good dialog mics, I bought (amongst a bunch of other stuff) an octava hyper from sound room. On most of the shoots i've helped out with, it has blown away the other mics available (mostly junk shotguns like the atr55, but also "widely regarded" mics like the me66.). But, just as I believed DVinfo forums that the Oktava rocked, I also believed you guys that the Schoeps cmc641 is so much better than the Oktava that it could make a cat urinating on a pie plate sound like angels... uh, urinating on a pie plate. So, I cashed out some of my earnings at istockphoto.com and bought one. (and an advanta-jib, but that will be another story when it arrives).
So after owning the schoeps for around 10 minutes and testing by a/b switching between them as I talk, here are my initial impressions of the two mics from the perspective of someone that does mostly visual production for a living:
1. The box.
First, the schoeps box is bigger. You know, the goofy wooden boxes that expensive mics come in that are too nice to throw away, but too big to actually carry around? The schoeps box is almost twice the size of the Oktava box. Inside the box is the mic with its capsule already attached, in a slot much longer than the mic, so it can slide around and bang the capsule against the foam. The Oktava box has a little extra compartment for the capsule (and spaces for multiple capsules) with everythign fitting nice and snug. I guess part of the thinking is that schoeps capsules are so expensive, you'd never ever be able to buy multiple capsules at the same time, so there are no need for spaces for them. Why the mic is loose to slide around? I guess its tougher than I think.
I guess the bigger box has more "damn, whats in the giant box?" sex appeal, but the Oktava box is small enough that it seems more like something jewelry would come in. I have a wooden box of dominos that is right in between the other two boxes in size, so that could confuse people if I am trying to impress with the box alone. The schoeps box looks nicer, but the Oktava box is made of cedar, so while it doesnt look as fancy, it smells really nice, so for this first criteria I'm going to have to go with Oktava as the superior device.
2. carrying around
The Oktava is so small that it can slide all the way into my rycote BBG and stow that way in my sound bag. It leaves the xlr pins exposed, but the mic is so inexpensive that i just aim the pins down so nothing falls into them and so far its worked out great.
The schoeps is longer by like an inch, so the mic sticks out of the back of the bbg by like 3/4 inch if you try to carry it around that way. In theory that should be fine, but since the schoeps cost more than the truck i'm driving it around in, it seems not good enough.
Does anybody make a padded tube for the schoeps? Like, an oversized cigar tube with foam inside? How do you guys carry your mics around? Do you have a cart for the wooden boxes?
3. Looks.
I got the grey schoeps, so its texture is similar to the oktava, but a bit finer. However, the schoeps looks like they were sober when they painted it. Also, unlike the Oktava, the schoeps looks like they painted the mic exterior before they added the stuff inside.
If you unscrew the top of the Oktava, there are a couple contacts. If you unscrew the schoeps there are concentric rings of like 4 or 5 contacts. I have no idea what they are for, but the schoeps definitely wins for overall cosmetics as well as the number of contacts between the body and capsule.
4. Weight
The Oktava is shorter, but feels heavier. It might not be, but using the highly accurate "jiggling them around in my two hands" technique, the schoeps felt a little bit lighter.
5. Paranoia
One distinct advantage of the Oktava is that you can leave the mic in your closet when you go roller skating and you dont really worry whether or not it will be stolen when you return. Heck, the Oktava is so cheap you could leave the thing on the bus and not be too heartbroken. The schoeps is so expensive it makes me think that everybody is out to steal it. Speaking of which... what exactly are you staring at?
6. Bragging rights
Well. I live in New Zealand, and so far I haven't run into anyone that has heard of either Schoeps or Oktava. In order to impress people I have to first educate them about the two brands, the relative quality difference, then try to impress them with just how insanely expensive the schoeps was without making them think it was a waste of money. So really, unless I run into some north island sound guys, or other DVinfo patrons, the bragging is mostly lost. I can just say "i have a nz$3,000 mic" and they'll say "damn"... but really, i could have just lied and said that about the Oktava.
7. resale value
The Oktava probably holds close to 80% of its original purchase price, so thats pretty good. The schoeps, however, went up in price like $400 the day after i bought it, so thusfar, i think the schoeps has actually appreciated in value.
8. handling noise
I somehow missed all the discussions about handling noise of the schoeps before buying it. For some reason i thought it would have none. It has a tiny bit less handling noise than the Oktava, but not enough to get too excited about that alone. I tried it in my ktek KSSM mount with the soft bands, and while a slightly larger mic than the Oktava, it seemed to dampen down nicely. I'll have to test it more in the wild.
9. the BEST mic
Well, for a couple years I've been hearing schoeps schoeps schoeps by the people that talk a lot on forums. Now that I've bent over and bought the schoeps, everybody is chattering about how the new mkh8040 sounds better. doh!
10. printed materials
The schoeps comes with a brochure/ad for the collete series, plus a warranty card. The Oktava came with a couple graphs, one of which looks like my great aunt's signature and the other like she was trying to draw a circle while overdosing. Since the schoeps didnt come with anything like that, the oktava is superior on this front.
11. The sound quality
I'm always annoyed when people say things like "its subjective depending on your ears" because I really want things to be more concrete than that. Well, here is my honest opinion for sound people to condemn me for...
If i listen to the schoeps for awhile and switch to the Oktava, the Oktava sounds thin and slightly "metallic" in the upper mids. However, If i listen to the Oktava for awhile and switch to the schoeps, the schoeps sounds a little bit heavy on the low end. If i'm doing an audio mix in post, then I have a clear sense of tone and clarity and how well something sits in a mix, but for some reason just a/b testing these two mics, I cant get a baseline that makes one sound infinitely better than the other. Both would certainly be totally serviceable to edit, and I've without a doubt had far worse results than either from "sound professionals."
So I would only do post color grading on a known monitor that has been set up properly and has a neutral environment with appropriate lighting. In that context, i can compare two hues and determine which works better.
I have no idea how to do that with audio, especially outside of a mix. I mean, how do you clear your audio pallete? Do you listen to white noise for awhile? I could never grade color while wearing sunglasses or in a room with natural light that changes throughout the day. What exactly are people using as a base for "natural"?
Conclusion:
Um. people way more gifted (obsessed?) with audio (or at least, talking about it) say that the schoeps sounds way better... so I have no reason to doubt that it does. However, neither mic sounds "bad" the way an atr55 or me66 does to me.
I should do a double blind test between the schoeps and oktava to determine just how uncivilized my ears really are.
I suppose the beauty here is that I really dont need to believe. As long as I send the schoeps through my sound devices mixer into a 24 bit recorder, (and use good boom technique) then my interior dialog in theory should sound great.
...at least, it will sound great until people decide the 8040 sounds SO much better, and some new field mixer/preamp with super-oxygenated battery terminals comes along and suddenly my rig will sound like dookie.
So thats my unqualified opinion. I hope you found it helpful in some way.
cheers,
-a