Dirk Bouwen
December 1st, 2007, 03:17 AM
More a remark than a question...
It's a pity that the A1 doesn't have any straight forward reference to the zoom/focal stops.
It has a lens that in HD runs from focal distance 'SLR' equivalent of 32,5 to 650mm. It was almost by accident that I discovered under the 'custom functions', 'zoom indicator' you can switch from a dial to number indication. Doing this, a small calculation (assuming the lens behaves linear) leads to the following (I only retained the relevant 'photographic' numbers):
Number / focal d mm
0 32,5
3 51,22
11 101,14
17 138,58
27 200,98
43 300,82
59 400,66
91 600,34
99 650,26
This is surely of interest when you care about framing and the spacial look of your footage. Imagine that in photography it is hardly mainstream to walk around with anything above 200mm's... being in the A1 at about 1/3th of the zoom scale.
I also understand this won't be very accurate, but comparing it to a SLR, it should match to a certain extend. I've the impression it's a little bit more wide-angle in the lower numbers.
Anyone having thoughts on this?
It's a pity that the A1 doesn't have any straight forward reference to the zoom/focal stops.
It has a lens that in HD runs from focal distance 'SLR' equivalent of 32,5 to 650mm. It was almost by accident that I discovered under the 'custom functions', 'zoom indicator' you can switch from a dial to number indication. Doing this, a small calculation (assuming the lens behaves linear) leads to the following (I only retained the relevant 'photographic' numbers):
Number / focal d mm
0 32,5
3 51,22
11 101,14
17 138,58
27 200,98
43 300,82
59 400,66
91 600,34
99 650,26
This is surely of interest when you care about framing and the spacial look of your footage. Imagine that in photography it is hardly mainstream to walk around with anything above 200mm's... being in the A1 at about 1/3th of the zoom scale.
I also understand this won't be very accurate, but comparing it to a SLR, it should match to a certain extend. I've the impression it's a little bit more wide-angle in the lower numbers.
Anyone having thoughts on this?