View Full Version : Do I need a DAT?


SiuChung Leung
November 1st, 2007, 08:49 PM
I am working at a small studio; my job is working on production sound and post production sound. We mostly do wedding, MV for indi band and Internet video (short drama and documentary). For short drama, I would use boom mic plug into Azden FMX32 filed mixer then connect to camera. It works fine for me.

Now I am working on a short film project, 80% of audio will be in post-production. I am thinking should I get a DAT for this project. I would use that for location sound reference and ambient noise. Also some foley may need to record outdoor with DAT.

So should I get one?

David W. Jones
November 1st, 2007, 08:55 PM
I have not used a DAT in a number of years.

John Kary
November 1st, 2007, 09:05 PM
Go with a solid-state recorder... they are the future of location recording. Something like a Tascam HD-P2 should start you off well.

Steve House
November 2nd, 2007, 02:43 AM
I am working at a small studio; my job is working on production sound and post production sound. We mostly do wedding, MV for indi band and Internet video (short drama and documentary). For short drama, I would use boom mic plug into Azden FMX32 filed mixer then connect to camera. It works fine for me.

Now I am working on a short film project, 80% of audio will be in post-production. I am thinking should I get a DAT for this project. I would use that for location sound reference and ambient noise. Also some foley may need to record outdoor with DAT.

So should I get one?

I'll second John's comments. DATs have largely been edged out of the market by file-based recorders writing directly to internal hard-drives and/or memory cards. DATs are still available but both the recorders and tape stock are expensive and they offer few if any advantages over the file-based alternatives.

Andy Wilkinson
November 2nd, 2007, 05:06 AM
Or what about using a Zoom H2 or H4? (there are other makes of these devices also.) Basically, they are flash media based digital recorders (not even a hard drive) with built in microphones and mic input sockets. The advantage is that you can put them where you want to record the sound/independent of the camera (theft considerations aside!) I don't own one (yet - thinking about the H2) but they might be suitable for your needs. I actually use an Archos AV420 (20GB hard drive media player/recorder) with microphone attached to it's line in socket (via a tiny mic preamp) for my off camera Audio stuff at present. Not sure if Zoom's are available in NZ but Google them to get more info.... or I'm sure someone who has direct experience will let us both know if they are any good.

Wayne Brissette
November 2nd, 2007, 05:36 AM
I recently worked on a feature film and we used the Zaxcom Deva as our recorder. At the end of the day, we would mirror (AKA copy) all the audio onto a DVD-RAM disc for Telecine to do the dailies. The first day I turned in a DVD-RAM to the film truck, the guy asked me what that was. When I told him the daily audio, he looked puzzled. I asked what he was expecting and he told me a DAT tape. I told him that I hadn't used DAT in 3.5 years and Telecine would know exactly what to do with it (they did).

DAT was wonderful technology in 1980, but today recorders are hard to find, repairing them even tougher. Go with the recommendation of a solid state recorder.

Wayne

SiuChung Leung
November 2nd, 2007, 04:59 PM
Seems like DAT is quite out of date.... I will look into those digital recorder. Thank you!

Jaron Berman
November 2nd, 2007, 06:19 PM
You could always make a BIG investment, and get a Sonosax. Nothing else quite like it! I'm no sound guy, but even I had equipment envy when I saw this little gem: In person, it's really impossible to believe how much it can do as well as it does, especially being so small! It's TINY!

http://www.libermansound.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=79

Ty Ford
November 4th, 2007, 06:27 AM
If you have that kind of money, I'd err on the conservative side and get a Sound Devices 744T. (or less expensive 702T)
http://www.sounddevices.com/products/744t.htm

The eight channel feature does look interesting though. I wonder if it writes poly wav files. The four channel 744T makes poly wav files, if you select that. That means you have one file icon that has four separate synchronized tracks. FCP sees the file on import and automatically drops all four on separate tracks on its timeline.

I like my 744T a lot. I records to BOTH HD and CF at the same time.

Just got the new firmware update which lets the recorder also record to a $200 external DVD drive that's powered from the 744T as well. Haven't tried that yet, but it also works for making daily audio available fairly quickly.

Regards,

Ty Ford

Bill Ravens
November 4th, 2007, 07:41 AM
Sound Devices rocks! That's the way to go.

Anna Harmon
November 4th, 2007, 10:44 AM
A funny story: some dude is selling an old Tascam DAT recorder on Ebay calling it the "wave of the future".

Thought you guys might get a chuckle out of that.

Wayne Brissette
November 4th, 2007, 11:56 AM
If you have that kind of money, I'd err on the conservative side and get a Sound Devices 744T. (or less expensive 702T)
http://www.sounddevices.com/products/744t.htm


My one and only complaint about the 744t is that it only has two preamps in it, so you can only use two channels to power microphones. I find the 702/722 useful as a backup to the Deva, but the 744 just needs to add two additional preamps to be super useful. OK, There is only more thing I don't like about the 7xx series, it's the menu system. But, that's more of something you either like, or dislike. I'm spoiled by the Deva and really like the touch screen. But it's not for everybody, which is why I think SD did a smart thing with the 744/722. However, the menus are now getting extremely long.

Wayne

Ty Ford
November 4th, 2007, 12:05 PM
A funny story: some dude is selling an old Tascam DAT recorder on Ebay calling it the "wave of the future".

Thought you guys might get a chuckle out of that.

Wow! How old was that post? :)

I still have two working SV 3900 Panasonic DATS. My SV-255 "went away" last years sometime.

Regards,

Ty Ford

Petri Kaipiainen
November 4th, 2007, 01:08 PM
I agree SD7xx menus are long, but there is also a possibility of loading presets. I have not tried those yet, have to give them a shot.

Anna Harmon
November 4th, 2007, 11:03 PM
Wow! How old was that post? :)

I still have two working SV 3900 Panasonic DATS. My SV-255 "went away" last years sometime.

Regards,

Ty Ford

2 weeks ago the latest.

Are they still using DAT for playback on music videos? I haven't encountered any.

Ty Ford
November 5th, 2007, 08:46 AM
As with the two 1/4" reel to reel decks I have, I think the answer is probably "not often."

OTOH, I have a reel here now someone dropped off so it could be transferred to CD and those are billable hours.

Regards,

Ty Ford

SiuChung Leung
November 5th, 2007, 01:32 PM
So guys, any suggestion on entry level field digital recorder? The model I am looking at is around $1000(Fostex FR2, TASCAM HD-P2), and it wouldn't fit into to our budget...

I come across with Marantz PMD660, is about $500 with XLR input but without time code.

the other one is Zoom H4 around $300...

Gerry Gallegos
November 5th, 2007, 10:18 PM
Either one will work just fine with a little work in post. remember you can sometimes make up features with elbow grease in post. the time code just makes it easier to sync, but with out it you can still do it manually , like in the old school days.

Allen Green
November 5th, 2007, 11:02 PM
I am working at a small studio; my job is working on production sound and post production sound. We mostly do wedding, MV for indi band and Internet video (short drama and documentary). For short drama, I would use boom mic plug into Azden FMX32 filed mixer then connect to camera. It works fine for me.

Now I am working on a short film project, 80% of audio will be in post-production. I am thinking should I get a DAT for this project. I would use that for location sound reference and ambient noise. Also some foley may need to record outdoor with DAT.

So should I get one?

All of the answer threads are solid, but what kind of mics are you going to plug into a dat/harddisk recorder? What video camera are you shooting on? Most of the higher end mini DV cameras or if you are using HDV have XLR inputs and a decent audio set up. I would put my money in some good mics maybe a boompole or upgrade the mixer, invest in a wireless or a number of other upgrades instead of spending the money on a recorder. Many short films and indies are recording into the camera. If you have a good soundguy who will monitor the return and pays attention to the details you can get what you need from the camera. JM2C
Good luck.

SiuChung Leung
November 5th, 2007, 11:24 PM
All of the answer threads are solid, but what kind of mics are you going to plug into a dat/harddisk recorder? What video camera are you shooting on? Most of the higher end mini DV cameras or if you are using HDV have XLR inputs and a decent audio set up. I would put my money in some good mics maybe a boompole or upgrade the mixer, invest in a wireless or a number of other upgrades instead of spending the money on a recorder. Many short films and indies are recording into the camera. If you have a good soundguy who will monitor the return and pays attention to the details you can get what you need from the camera. JM2C
Good luck.

I am using Sennheiser ME66 as boom mic, plug into Azden FMX-32 3-Channel Field Mixer and goes into JVC GY-HD251E Professional Video Camera PAL and Panasonic AG-HPX500 DVCPRO HD Camcorder by XRL cable.

I am also thinking put the money to get a better location headset to monitor the sound.