Bob Hart
September 25th, 2007, 07:55 AM
Does anyone know if Cineform CFHD .avi files and TMPGEnc software get on with each other.
Is there a worthwhile advantage to using this encoder over Adobe's licenced MainConcept encoder for DVD-Video disk builds.
Advice will be greatly appreciated.
Gildo Houtekamer
September 25th, 2007, 08:28 AM
Yes, very well actually.
What advantage are you looking for?
Marty Baggen
September 25th, 2007, 10:27 AM
What advantage are you looking for?
For me, it provides much cleaner MPEG2, much better deinterlacing capabilities.
Nice interface for tweaking data rates, frame size, etc. A Swiss Army knife for outputting and converting.
Bob Hart
September 26th, 2007, 02:47 AM
On previous tests of MiniDV it seemed to work better. With groundglass relay imaging, I need to have as little resolution and colour fidelity loss as I can possibly get.
The "free" version ran out after 30 days before I got round to test it with CFHD and the donkey trap will not let me un-install and re-install. So before I buy in the real thing I wanted to know if would stumble in its dance with Cineform.
Herman Van Deventer
September 27th, 2007, 04:46 AM
Be rest assured /
Been using Prospect and TMPGenc for the past year.
TMPGenc proves to be the best bang for your buck.
Brad Tyrrell
September 27th, 2007, 05:59 PM
I used Aspect in CS3 and got faded colors and greys instead of blacks with the MainConcept encoder. I now frameserve with DebugMode to Tmpgenc. Colors are great, blacks are black. Worth the hundred bucks.