View Full Version : CineForm and Sony Vegas 8
James Campbell August 28th, 2007, 07:39 AM I love Neo; I've been working with the trial and was just about to purchase. I am also going to be purchasing the upgrade to Vegas when it comes out at the beginning of September. I'm assuming that Cineform hasn't given Vegas everything and there will still be the same advantages to purchasing Cineform on its own (i.e., High, Film Scan levels only in Neo vs Vegas)?
David Newman August 28th, 2007, 08:48 AM You are completely safe in your NEO purchase with the upcoming Vegas verison, both in features and compatibility.
Steven Thomas September 5th, 2007, 09:37 AM Since Sony Vegas 8 supports 10 bit 4:2:2, does Cineform have any plans in
offering an upgrade that will allow this 10 bit color space support?
I realize that NEO (not NEO HDV) offers this ability, but my understanding is the cineform support within Sony Vegas 7 only is only updated via NEO HDV.
Michael Mann September 5th, 2007, 02:11 PM I'd like to know that, too.
David Newman September 5th, 2007, 03:12 PM NEO HD and NEO 2K also work with Vegas.
In fact NEO 2K adds 4:4:4 and 4:4:4:4 (RGB with alpha) directly in Vegas. So there are already reasons to go beyond NEO HDV with Vegas. As for deeper pixel I/O within Vegas 8, we haven't made any annoucements yet, but clearly if there is interest, CineForm will support it at some point.
Mark Duckworth September 5th, 2007, 05:30 PM NEO HD and NEO 2K also work with Vegas.
In fact NEO 2K adds 4:4:4 and 4:4:4:4 (RGB with alpha) directly in Vegas. So there are already reasons to go beyond NEO HDV with Vegas. As for deeper pixel I/O within Vegas 8, we haven't made any annoucements yet, but clearly if there is interest, CineForm will support it at some point.
Just for clarification using NEO HD or NEO 2K in Vegas 8 keep the same bit depth, ie 10-bit 4:2:2, when exporting out of Vegas?
Thank you in advance for your answer.
David Newman September 5th, 2007, 05:34 PM Just for clarification using NEO HD or NEO 2K in Vegas 8 keep the same bit depth, ie 10-bit 4:2:2, when exporting out of Vegas?
I'll repeat my last post :
"As for deeper pixel I/O within Vegas 8, we haven't made any annoucements yet, but clearly if there is interest, CineForm will support it at some point."
"Deeper I/O" means 10-bit or greater.
Michael Mann September 6th, 2007, 12:43 AM "... but clearly if there is interest, CineForm will support it at some point."
Good to hear, thanks. I hope there will be enough interest soon.
Mark Duckworth September 6th, 2007, 05:03 AM I'll repeat my last post :
"As for deeper pixel I/O within Vegas 8, we haven't made any annoucements yet, but clearly if there is interest, CineForm will support it at some point."
"Deeper I/O" means 10-bit or greater.
Considering that PPro already supports it, I don't think it would be too much to ask to extend that support to users who have been waiting since Vegas 5 for it to go to 10 bit. Since this is the beginning of an upgrade path (software and hardware) to 10-bit for me, I would dearly like to be able to continue to use Cineform in Vegas 8 and not have to switch to another codec in order for my 10-bit footage to use the full color processing of Vegas 8.
Thank you.
David Newman September 6th, 2007, 09:33 AM Mark,
All codecs will need to be updated to support the Vegas API for deeper than 8-bit. So we have no competitors yet. We need to support the 32-bit float API, that is what we hope there is sufficient interest for.
Don Donatello September 6th, 2007, 09:42 AM "Since Sony Vegas 8 supports 10 bit 4:2:2"
is this true ?
i have read the release but ..but ... it's not really clear to me it is 10 bit - yes i know it states 32bit float video engine but that doesn't tell me after it goes thru that 32bit float it writes me a 10 bit clip ...
David Newman September 6th, 2007, 09:49 AM 10-bit 4:2:2 only exists at the file level, Vegas doesn't support YUV or 4:2:2 chroma sampling, so it is up to the codec and I/O module to translate to the Vegas internal pixel format. Previously Vegas only had 8-bit per channel RGB, and that limited the usefulness of 10-bit imports and exports (CineForm uses 10-bit YUV with the compressor anyway as there is a slight advantage.) With a 32-bit float internal format the I/O module could take all the 10 precision an map that to 32-bit float.
The biggest advantage to Vegas, is it can now work with RAW cameras, SI-2K, Red, etc. as 8-bit is just too limiting for these camera dynamic range.
Bill Ravens September 6th, 2007, 03:35 PM well, there certainly is an interest from me for Cineform to support a 32 bit float.
Steven Thomas September 6th, 2007, 05:17 PM You can count me in on this one!
Don Donatello September 6th, 2007, 07:51 PM " biggest advantage to Vegas, is it can now work with RAW cameras, SI-2K, Red, "
and speaking of RED raw ... any cineform solution in the makings ??
David Newman September 6th, 2007, 09:11 PM We still haven't got tools from Red yet to add support. Need RedAlert and RedCine when that is out, and some r3d files would be nice.
Serge Victorovich September 8th, 2007, 11:54 AM sorry, wrong thread
Mark Woollard September 10th, 2007, 03:51 AM David, I too am interested in NEO supporting 32-bit float in Vegas Pro 8.
Mark Duckworth September 10th, 2007, 09:44 AM I cannot drop any video onto the timeline that uses the cineform codec (audio only no video). In the preview I get the video stream attributes cannot be determined. Vegas 7 is still running good. Trouble ticket here I come.
Steven Thomas September 10th, 2007, 09:57 AM Let us know if you get your issue fixed.
If it's a Cineform issue with Vegas 8, I'll have to hold off from upgrading to Vegas 8.
On the other hand, it seems odd that Cineform would have an issue. Especially since I imagine the problem would of been caught with the Vegas 8 beta testers.
Mark Duckworth September 10th, 2007, 10:01 AM Since I installed Quicktime 7.2 (I really hated to do that) Vegas Pro 8 will now recognize a Cineform file if its a .mov but still nothing if its an .avi
David Newman September 10th, 2007, 10:02 AM Yes CineForm components are working fine in Vegas 8. Re-install your CineForm product as it sounds like you simply missing the CineForm VFW codec.
Mark Duckworth September 10th, 2007, 10:17 AM Uninstalled, re-installed. Still the same. I even recaptured some footage. once in .mov and once in avi. the .mov are fine but it does not recognize the .avi files. I am using the latest version of NEO HD. I even encoded a test file in VP8 to a Cineform .avi with no problem.
David Newman September 10th, 2007, 10:35 AM See if you can load an AVI into VirtualDub as that is VFW only for AVI, like Vegas. As I know Vegas 8 works fine, you may also want to try Sony's support. This is the release version not a beta I hope?
Mark Duckworth September 10th, 2007, 10:44 AM works fine in VDub. Download VP8 from sonymediasoftware today.
Michael Mann September 10th, 2007, 10:53 AM It doesn't work for me, either.
I just rendered an HDV clip to Cineform (Vegas 8-default) and tried to load the render back into the Vegas 8-session: Only audio is imported.
Mark Duckworth September 10th, 2007, 11:03 AM I just rendered an HDV clip to Cineform (Vegas 8-default) and tried to load the render back into the Vegas 8-session: Only audio is imported.
I did the same test. Same results. Trouble ticket in. Going to bed. Check back tomorrow. Feel free to take the point, Michael.
Bill Ravens September 10th, 2007, 03:49 PM same problem, here. all cineform intermediates are unreadable. doesn't matter if they were generated by HDLink or within Vegas 8.
Steven Thomas September 10th, 2007, 08:58 PM This is extremely bad news.
I was hoping to upgrade from NEO HDV to NEO HD to benefit using Vegas 8 new 32bit video engine. It looks like I'm waiting on both.
David Newman September 10th, 2007, 09:30 PM It is working in the very last beta, so something may have happened in the gold master, our Sony contacts are still returning from IBC (tomorrow), so we intent to get to the bottom of this soon. We hope that there is a simple workaround until Sony addresses the bug.
Marc Salvatore September 10th, 2007, 11:22 PM For what's it's worth I'm using Neo captured files that were converted in HDLink using "High quality" and "Vegas Smart Rendering". My NEO demo just expired but I installed the free player and have been editing all day in Vegas 8 with no problems.
Marc
Kris Bird September 11th, 2007, 04:06 AM I installed the Trial and dragged in some cineform avis to try it out, no problems whatsoever. Not an exhaustive test of different cineform file types (i.e. vegas cineform intermediates vs hdlink vs hdlink smart render), but it all appeared to work.
Mark Duckworth September 11th, 2007, 05:42 AM I installed the Trial. . .
Which one? NEO HD or NEO HDV?
Jim Day September 11th, 2007, 08:05 AM Add me to the list. I'm using NEO-HDV and the avi's show up in Vegas 8 Pro with audio only; no video.
Chris Barcellos September 11th, 2007, 09:42 AM Guys. I have Neo HDV, and I loaded Vegas 8 trial. I then loaded a 7 project. Which included Cineform files. Everything is smooth as silk, and play, previewing, and rendering fine !!
James Campbell September 11th, 2007, 10:38 AM I purchased Vegas 8, and loaded a file with dozens of intermediates from Neo and there's been no problems at all.
David Newman September 11th, 2007, 10:55 AM Thank you for the positive reports, so it is not all failing. For those how are have troubles, please sent your system and software details to both CineForm & Sony Vegas support. We know it is on Sony end, but CineForm might be able to help.
Bill Ravens September 11th, 2007, 02:59 PM The following has been posted to both Sony and Cineform Tech Support:
I have Cineform NEO HDV version 3.10(cineform HD codec 3.2.6) installed and have generated Cineform Imtermediate files with Vegas 7. Vegas 8 does not recognize the video stream, however, it recognizes the audio stream, only. I've generated a cineform intermediate from within Vegas 8, and, I experience the same problem not recognizing the video stream.
More info: I have Vegas 8 installed on another computer which does not have NeoHDV installed. On this machine, I can successfully generate a CF Intermediate file (default Vegas 8 cineform HD codec is version 2.8.)
It appears the problem is reading Cineform Intermediates generated with cineform HD codec version 3.10
Jim Day September 11th, 2007, 03:30 PM Just another fact to add to my post above. I still have Vegas 7 on the same computer at Vegas 8 Pro and the files generated from NeoHDV still play fine (both audio and video) in Vegas 7, but only audio in Vegas 8 Pro.
By the way, if I try and play the files in Premiere Pro CS3 (also on the same computer), I get the same results as I do in Vegas 8 Pro (audio only and black screen).
David Newman September 11th, 2007, 04:14 PM We are at CineForm, and none of the Vegas-8 beta testers, seem to be having any problems. I even tried installing NEO HDV of the version you have, and it all works fine. That means we need more information and Sony will need it as well, the question is what info.
One thing to try is renaming the cfhd.dll that Sony ships (located in C:\Program Files\Sony\Vegas Pro 8.0), this is not compatible with newer v3 CFHD files, but it should not be used unless your registry is messed up somehow. Removing this component should force the usage on the NEO version located in WINDOW\system32.
Marc Salvatore September 11th, 2007, 04:43 PM David,
I'm one of the ones not having problems and FWIW I had the NEO 3.05 demo installed and now the free Neo Player.
Marc
Bill Ravens September 11th, 2007, 04:59 PM David...
I disabled the CFHD.dll that shipped with V8. This seems to have solved the problem. ;o)
David Newman September 11th, 2007, 05:07 PM Bill, please report that to Sony, as they should be detecting the newer CFHD.dll in system32 and not loading their older one.
Mark Duckworth September 11th, 2007, 05:20 PM David...
I disabled the CFHD.dll that shipped with V8. This seems to have solved the problem. ;o)
I did the same, works fine now. I will send the info along to Sony.
Great work, David.
Steven Thomas September 11th, 2007, 08:23 PM Ok, now that you all disabled Sony's own CFHD.DLL, is the new cineform version available to render from the timeline?
Good call David.
David Newman September 11th, 2007, 08:38 PM Steven, if you have NEO, Aspect or Prospect installed, then cfhd.dll is found in its normal location and you don't need the Sony version.
Matti Remonen September 12th, 2007, 04:08 AM Really weird problem, since I have not had any problems with NEO HDV. I'm currently working with a project which uses footage converted more than 6 months ago from m2t to Cineform AVI and they work like charm. I also re-converted few clips to see if this has something to do with the current NEO HDV -version but those worked 100% OK also.
I also removed/reinstalled VP8 (because that is required when going from trial to registered version) and nothing broke.
The problem must be something else than just the .dll which came with the VP8. The only thing to do still is to remove V7 and see what happens but I'm not intending to do that for some time.
P.S. Getting significantly higher framerates on preview with VP8 with same settings.
Michael Mann September 12th, 2007, 07:10 AM I disabled the CFHD.dll that shipped with V8. This seems to have solved the problem. ;o)
Good to hear. But how do I disable CFHD.dll? Simply delete it? Thanks for clarification in advance.
Update: I just deleted it. It works. Hope I did right.
Steven Thomas September 12th, 2007, 08:16 AM You can delete it, or just rename it CFHD.old or whatever you choose.
David Newman September 12th, 2007, 08:42 AM Matti,
The fault is not widespread, your PC is just working correctly. The presences of the old cfhd.dll is not the error, it is Vegas's error to use it when a newer version is present -- this only occurs on some systems.
|
|