Jonathan Jones
August 24th, 2007, 10:41 AM
I'm sorry I gotta do this, but its been a few days now with no feedback thread on this one.....so I'm just gonna start one. Mostly because I have a good question on this one.
But first, a few comments.
Bryan, I really like your work. I've watched this piece several times, studying it for your style. It wasn't until just a short while ago, as I was washing the breakfast dishes, that it hit me....why you titled it as you did. I should have gotten that sooner. Very clever.
Anyway, I loved the cinematic look you acheived with your depth of field, and it was a great setting.
I almost felt like this piece felt a bit like a crux scene that would fit in a larger movie documenting an interesting day or week in the lives of these characters. That would be a feature I would intend to watch. Dialogue driven character development is a very important skill, and by using it in such a way as making the viewer use their imagination to picture this mysterious character they are referring to....well, that was well done.
The only thing I noticed that I felt a little distracted by was that Iain, the actor on the right, came across as not entirely natural with the expressive use of his hands while speaking in a couple of shots....I almost got the feeling he was still experimenting with the right interpretation of memorized lines.
But that was a very minimal point. As I noted, I watched it several times, so perhaps I was eventually just looking for such things by then because I was really studying the detail of your work.
(I dug Brian's shirt, BTW.)
So, as for the question:
What was your technique for capturing the audio? I thought it was exceptionally well done. It sounded to me the way good film audio is supposed to sound. Very clean and clear with great levels.
I remember from your previous film, "Wolves", you mentioned running cable through the trunk and seats of a car to get good dialogue, but I'm guessing a different approach here since it was outdoors. Did you use a shotgun/boom combo?, and if so, what mic?
Thanks for sharing a great piece. It looked and sounded great and displayed a high degree of proficiency in your technique.
Great job.
-Jon
But first, a few comments.
Bryan, I really like your work. I've watched this piece several times, studying it for your style. It wasn't until just a short while ago, as I was washing the breakfast dishes, that it hit me....why you titled it as you did. I should have gotten that sooner. Very clever.
Anyway, I loved the cinematic look you acheived with your depth of field, and it was a great setting.
I almost felt like this piece felt a bit like a crux scene that would fit in a larger movie documenting an interesting day or week in the lives of these characters. That would be a feature I would intend to watch. Dialogue driven character development is a very important skill, and by using it in such a way as making the viewer use their imagination to picture this mysterious character they are referring to....well, that was well done.
The only thing I noticed that I felt a little distracted by was that Iain, the actor on the right, came across as not entirely natural with the expressive use of his hands while speaking in a couple of shots....I almost got the feeling he was still experimenting with the right interpretation of memorized lines.
But that was a very minimal point. As I noted, I watched it several times, so perhaps I was eventually just looking for such things by then because I was really studying the detail of your work.
(I dug Brian's shirt, BTW.)
So, as for the question:
What was your technique for capturing the audio? I thought it was exceptionally well done. It sounded to me the way good film audio is supposed to sound. Very clean and clear with great levels.
I remember from your previous film, "Wolves", you mentioned running cable through the trunk and seats of a car to get good dialogue, but I'm guessing a different approach here since it was outdoors. Did you use a shotgun/boom combo?, and if so, what mic?
Thanks for sharing a great piece. It looked and sounded great and displayed a high degree of proficiency in your technique.
Great job.
-Jon