Stephen Pruitt
August 23rd, 2007, 08:26 AM
Hi all. . .
You have been most helpful with my requests, so, since no good deed goes unpunished, here's another.
I am currently using an HVX-200. The HVX records 4 channels of audio. I am about to modify my camera so that I can use 4 XLR connectors into the camera instead of just the standard two (the on camera mics typically record to the other two audio tracks, but I am going to disconnect my on-camera mics and replace them with line ins and run extra external mics instead).
What would I gain in using a field mixer as opposed to just a 48V phantom power unit for my two extra mic inputs? It does not appear that I'll be able to bypass the HVX's internal preamps and just go line in to the camera.
Thanks much.
Stephen
You have been most helpful with my requests, so, since no good deed goes unpunished, here's another.
I am currently using an HVX-200. The HVX records 4 channels of audio. I am about to modify my camera so that I can use 4 XLR connectors into the camera instead of just the standard two (the on camera mics typically record to the other two audio tracks, but I am going to disconnect my on-camera mics and replace them with line ins and run extra external mics instead).
What would I gain in using a field mixer as opposed to just a 48V phantom power unit for my two extra mic inputs? It does not appear that I'll be able to bypass the HVX's internal preamps and just go line in to the camera.
Thanks much.
Stephen