View Full Version : Holy Heat! Low Heat Lighting Solutions?
Peter Moretti August 13th, 2007, 09:50 PM I'm doing some dry runs for my documentary interviews using an Omni and a soft box. I just don't feel comfortable asking someone to sit in that heat for potentially 45 mins. An actor, sure, but a regular person who's agreed to be interviewed in their living room, no way.
I've seen references to Cool Lights, but found the website confusing and the intro video sparse on details. But it looks like a possible solution.
I imagine a Kino Fo fatboy (4 tubes, 2') or the ikan S400 are alternatives. And this DayFlo kit seems unusually inexpensive: http://www.pclightingsystems.com/DF/1500-kit.html
But incandescent is just too darn hot, IMHO.
Any other ideas?
Richard Andrewski August 13th, 2007, 10:37 PM What can I help you with that the website didn't? Generally if someone has a question, they use the contact us page and send an email to me and everyone will tell you they are answered very quickly. The following is the product page for the CL-255 and its just made for interviews and intimate settings:
http://www.coollights.biz/cl255-cool-lights-watt-fluorescent-video-soft-light-p-30.html
Comes with 2 free tubes in either 3200K or 5600K. An optional baby stand adapter can be chosen too in the option drop down box at the bottom of the page.
As far as the intro video, we have some videos about DIY solutions and that type of thing but I haven't done videos on our preassembled / packaged solutions like the above.
What would you like to see in a video on these products? I guess one reason I haven't done more product videos is because we've sold hundreds of fixtures in our first seven months and maybe two inquiries for more product video introductions. I had planned to do more there but we have many new products coming up so I've been spending my time there where it would seem to be most effective.
Peter Moretti August 13th, 2007, 11:05 PM Richard,
Thanks for your reply! To be honest, the intro video left me wondering the extent to which your offerings are DIY versus completely fabricated. The same with the website, I imagine this is because a lot of (useful) DIY info/FAQ's are interspersed.
So along those lines, I read your description and the website's. Just to be sure, is the kit you're recommending ready to go out of the box? (I caught the part about the optional stand.)
Thanks again for your help!
Richard Andrewski August 14th, 2007, 04:35 AM Richard,
Thanks for your reply! To be honest, the intro video left me wondering the extent to which your offerings are DIY versus completely fabricated. The same with the website, I imagine this is because a lot of (useful) DIY info/FAQ's are interspersed.
So along those lines, I read your description and the website's. Just to be sure, is the kit you're recommending ready to go out of the box? (I caught the part about the optional stand.)
Thanks again for your help!
Yes, the "intro video" you saw wasn't an intro video but just an excerpt of our original product my DIY fluorescent lighting video. All the DIY stuff has slowly been taking a back seat as we've been offering fully assembled solutions at very reasonable prices since I moved to China and have been doing all my R&D here as well as manufacturing and overseeing all that. It was this strategy that's let me offer things at the price point that I can. Plus I'm a video person too so I know what people want and need. In the meanwhile, I just haven't totally updated the site, so its sort of in the middle now of a transition to the new offerings and way of presenting them.
The CL-255, 455 and 655 are completely assembled and ready to go but we're out of stock for a bit on the 455 and 655. The stand adapter is optional because some use other kinds of attachments such as pipe clamps or whatever so we give them the option of a lesser price if they don't need a stand adapter.
In October when some of the older products are back in stock, we'll soon have some new plastic portable (CL-255P and CL-455P and maybe a CL-655P too) units. The CL-455P for instance weighs 8 lbs with the tubes--I believe people on the go will really like this model. Along with dimming versions too (CL-255PMD and CL-455PMD). They'll have a lolipop type mounting on the back to allow swinging them around horizontally or vertically and at angles. Looks a little like a Diva but it isn't a clone. Has some totally new ideas and improvements in durability and weight using a kind of plastic I've found which is very tough and lightweight.
I won't say you can't break it but if you hit it with a hammer, the hammer bounces back. This stuff is typically sold in transparent for atrium roofs in buildings so it's hail proof. We're using a black opaque version. The ballasts are hidden so they aren't in an obtrusive metal "hump" on the back and there are edge protection extrusions which are tougher as well as some aluminum end caps to protect the sockets, reflectors and tubes. When folded up, the 455P is super easy to tuck under your arm and go.
There are special lightweight but thick aluminum extrusion reflectors which add toughness and body and keep from having to have other metal backing plates which just add weight. Finally, there is a special PVC corrugated gasket that runs the length of the barndoor on each side and acts as an accessory holder for things like eggcrates to make them super easy to put in and take out, but won't fall out thanks to the grip of the PVC. Pictures included below...
Mark Sasahara August 19th, 2007, 08:00 PM Fluorescents are the way to go. Kino Flos. A pair of 2' x 4 tube Kinos are great for interviews. Lots of light and much less heat.
There are several manufacturers that have them, Arri, I think now has something, Mole, Balcar. I think Wescott has a softbox ring that you can screw up to five worm lights into and use a regular soft box. I think high CRI screw in fluoros are getting cheaper. Even if they aren't they last quite a long time, so it's still a good investment
Peter Moretti August 21st, 2007, 07:43 PM Richard,
Thank you very much for your info. and time putting together your post.
I had the opportunity to visit Kino Flo's office. I have to say the combination of nearby location, supporting the local economy and the time and effort they spent going over various options, including offering to lend lights for a film test, won me over.
I'm sure Cool Lights is a great product. And hopefully, when I want to add to my kit, I'll be able to include some cool lights. Thanks again.
Peter Moretti August 21st, 2007, 07:49 PM Fluorescents are the way to go. Kino Flos. A pair of 2' x 4 tube Kinos are great for interviews. Lots of light and much less heat...Kino Flo explained to me the other day the difference between the 4 bulb 2' "Fatboy" and the Diva Light 400. Essentially, the Diva is dimmable, but this dimming will affect color balance if taken too far. Alternatively/in addition to dimming, the Diva's can be switched from four to two bulbs. They said for on location video, the Diva is really the light to use.
The "Fatboy" has a special ballast designed to keep its color balance neutral, but this is defeated by the fact that you really can't lower the current to the bulbs on the Fatboy like you can on the 4' model. So the "only" way to change light output is by turning off individual bulbs.
All in all, they were very nice and extremely helpful.
Shawn Redford August 26th, 2007, 11:50 PM They'll have a lolipop type mounting on the back to allow swinging them around horizontally or vertically and at angles.
I won't say you can't break it but if you hit it with a hammer, the hammer bounces back. This stuff is typically sold in transparent for atrium roofs in buildings so it's hail proof. We're using a black opaque version. The ballasts are hidden so they aren't in an obtrusive metal "hump" on the back and there are edge protection extrusions which are tougher as well as some aluminum end caps to protect the sockets, reflectors and tubes. When folded up, the 455P is super easy to tuck under your arm and go.
There are special lightweight but thick aluminum extrusion reflectors which add toughness and body and keep from having to have other metal backing plates which just add weight. Finally, there is a special PVC corrugated gasket that runs the length of the barndoor on each side and acts as an accessory holder for things like eggcrates to make them super easy to put in and take out, but won't fall out thanks to the grip of the PVC. Pictures included below...
Your photos look great Richard. For travel on airlines or other abusive travel, can I unscrew the lolipop mount from the back in order to allow the back to lie flat in luggage? Having the back totally flat would also help with packing the lights into smaller cases. Also, will you be offering eggcrates with the product or as an add-on?
Richard Andrewski August 27th, 2007, 09:01 AM Yes, I've considered this issue. Here are my thoughts on it.
1). Right now its not easy to remove the lolipop because its attached with screws and nuts into the "backbone". I could use tapped holes in the backbone and spring loaded screws that stay on the lolipop and can't fall out to attach to these tapped holes.
2). Have a carrying case that has a special indented place in the bottom of the case for the lolipop (I'm trying to design a carrying case right now in fact--probably a soft sided one with lots of padding, wheels and trolley. The area around the indentation could be different compartments for the various accessories needed with the fixture including the "snake" stand adapter (until I think of a better name!) which adapts the lolipop to a 5/8" female adapter and keeps the fixture over the stand so the center of gravity is where it should be rather than out front of the stand which isn't too cool. Should be room for an adequate stand for the fixture too.
I finally have pictures of the new units with the wider barndoors, black end caps, dimmer, new switch placement and also the 2x55 model. They look great! I'm travelling right now and I don't have a CF card reader on my laptop though so I can't download the pictures from my camera till I get one in the next day or so. Then I'll post the revised pictures of the final fixture.
Yes, we will have the eggcrates as a low cost add-on and not included in the base price. It will be the same model as our studio fixtures use so they'll work in either fixture if you should have both.
Shawn Redford August 27th, 2007, 11:42 PM Richard, Option #1 would appeal to me, primarily because it allows for flexibility in packing, and it seems like the lights would have a better chance of survival in the long run. Just my $0.02 :)
Richard Andrewski August 28th, 2007, 02:24 AM Perhaps. Its probably not much more trouble as long as whatever we do doesn't add to the weight significantly because the main goal has not only been to be more durable but also to be the lightest weight portable fixture out there.
Stephen Eastwood August 28th, 2007, 11:51 AM When will the 255 portables be ready? I am looking at building up a set of lighting and 4 of them might work, but timing may be too long of a wait. Also would love to know what the light output at a given distance/f stop/iso/speed is.
Stephen Eastwood
http://www.StephenEastwood.com
Shawn Redford August 28th, 2007, 08:39 PM Perhaps. Its probably not much more trouble as long as whatever we do doesn't add to the weight significantly because the main goal has not only been to be more durable but also to be the lightest weight portable fixture out there.
If the lollipop stem were removable (as you describe above), then this seems like it would help in terms of shipping and packaging your product (e.g. smaller box and it could be square). I, for one, would prefer to assemble the stem and save a few dollars especially if that was a feature I wanted anyway for future travel with the lights. It might also mean less damage to your product. For those of us without studios, it would also mean more compact storage when the lights aren't in use. All in all, it seems like a win-win.
Richard Andrewski August 29th, 2007, 04:05 AM Most of my market is people that travel so I hear what you're saying.
The lolipop stem does come out very easily. But to be sure about terminology, I call the lolipop stem just the nylon ball and the metal rod attached to it. The other part is the lolipop holder and is cast aluminum. Right now its attached semi-permanently with screws and nuts. Thats the part I was mentioning could be changed to be removable by putting tapped holes into the backbone.
At least removing the stem would be recommended too if you transported the fixture with the lolipop holder attached in its carrying case. You'd probably get some scratching on the plastic over time with the stem left on. However, that plastic is very durable so I don't see it breaking without some serious help. It's listed as 80 times stonger than glass ;-)
Richard Andrewski August 29th, 2007, 04:11 AM When will the 255 portables be ready? I am looking at building up a set of lighting and 4 of them might work, but timing may be too long of a wait. Also would love to know what the light output at a given distance/f stop/iso/speed is.
Stephen Eastwood
http://www.StephenEastwood.com
The 255 portables should be ready in the same time frame as the others in October. If you can't wait, we still have the studio model 255s in stock now. Sorry I'm not back at my office and won't be for a while but when I do get back I'll try to take light meter readings. Hope this helps.
Shawn Redford August 29th, 2007, 05:27 PM Most of my market is people that travel so I hear what you're saying. ... The other part is the lolipop holder and is cast aluminum. Right now its attached semi-permanently with screws and nuts. Thats the part I was mentioning could be changed to be removable by putting tapped holes into the backbone. ... However, that plastic is very durable so I don't see it breaking without some serious help. It's listed as 80 times stonger than glass ;-)
Okay, thanks for the terminology update. I was thinking of the lollipop holder in my above posts. I really like the idea of being able to remove the lollipop HOLDER using integral screws that match tapped holes in the back. I'm sure the plastic is strong, but it's also a matter of packing lights to fit in baggage or possibly a carry-on. Being able to remove the lollipop holder would just seem to make a lot of sense. Maybe your customers could even put two lights flush against each other to protect the barndoors (maybe with a bit of foam in-between) and this would help them minimize the surfaces that are exposed for baggage/shipping personnel. Given the abuse that UPS delivers, I'd prefer the unit shipped that way as well. I'm looking forward to seeing your product.
Terry VerHaar August 29th, 2007, 07:23 PM Richard - When might you be taking orders or reservations for the various lights you are expecting in October? I have been holding off purchasing a kit until I could see what you came up with. The new products look they will fill the bill for me. I'd hate to miss out on the initial shipment. As far as I know, I am on your mailing list.
Thanks,
Terry.
Richard Andrewski August 30th, 2007, 08:22 AM Well I had a lot of grand plans for a pre-sale but when I started looking at the website programming changes to do all the various things I really wanted to do it was going to be too complicated and take too long. Plus it makes too many obligations if we start taking money before the goods have arrived. If anyone is on our list (signing up on the site) then they'll be notified in advance.
Richard Andrewski August 31st, 2007, 05:39 AM Here are pictures of the revised dimming version fixtures. Non-dimming will simply not have the dimming dial. The CL-255PMD and CL-455PMD. both of these were shot with the lolipop stem attached to a grip head, not the final stand adapter which adapts the lolipop stem to a 5/8" baby spud or a 1 1/8" junior female stand.
Richard Andrewski August 31st, 2007, 05:42 AM I also commissioned a 6 bulb fixture which they did, but the picture didn't turn out so great so I'll post that another time, but they also made me a 12 bulb fixture and a 6 bulb T12 fixture too--anticipating that I might want that in the future. Pictures below. On the T12, they put the ballasts inside the unit so they aren't removable. I told them I believe the removable ballast in a separate unit would be far more popular in the USA so if we sell that model we will re-engineer a separate 6 tube 75w ballast to accomodate it. While these are both very light, they will need a more hefty and larger aluminum lolipop instead of the nylon ball one on the smaller units. So a bit of re-engineering on that before we can call it a solution.
Peter Wittinghoff September 3rd, 2007, 01:17 PM First thing first; Richard, two thumps up for answering on a open forum.
I too have been looking through your website (found it through YouTube if of any interrest(?)) and been wondering what's up with your lights and what's the difference compared to more established (= more expensive) competitors. Of course I've also been curious about what the difference is between traditional halo/tungsten and the type of cool fixtures you're offering? Besides heat.
In general, the innovation with cool lights (low energy) is rapidly moving forwards. LED's are expected to take a new jump by the end of this/beginning of next year. Already, Power LEDs are putting out tremendously more light with much less heat/energy loss than traditional LEDs (such as the one found on the "power on" on your computer). A similar development is happening with tubes and bulbs.
For the time being I'm using simple work lights with tubes and bulbs, all with low enegy fixtures and som + 6000 light coming out of them. Works for the moment, but I will soon upgrade and Cool Lights™ are something I'm really considering. Do you ship to Sweden Richard?
Richard Andrewski September 3rd, 2007, 04:22 PM First thing first; Richard, two thumps up for answering on a open forum.
That's just how I do things. We design out in the open and solicit opinions until I feel I have a good cross section of what people really think. I even float trial balloons sometimes to see if an idea is crazy or not. You have some that don't understand that process and can't really participate but many potential customers do get it and love to be a part of the process.
From the start, all ballast-oriented film and t.v. lighting has been overly expensive and this is because they're treated mostly as black boxes, the contents of which are a mystery to the average person. The manufacturers have done a great job on selling that there is a proprietary technology there that can't be found elsewhere. I've been doing all I can to: 1). demystify these black boxes for those that want to build their own and 2). offer the black boxes at the normal prices that they should be for those that have no interest in DIY.
By the way, most of these different types of suitable ballasts are available from many sources now--especially fluorescent which are far from proprietary. Advance, Universal, Fulham, Sylvania/Osram--all make fluorescent ballasts that rival anything Kino Flo puts out. Tons of Chinese competitors too that are making great ballasts.
The area of HMI ballasts has been a bit more murky but even that is opening up now with many competitors coming in to make this a far more mature and commodity-based technology also.
I too have been looking through your website (found it through YouTube if of any interrest(?)) and been wondering what's up with your lights and what's the difference compared to more established (= more expensive) competitors. Of course I've also been curious about what the difference is between traditional halo/tungsten and the type of cool fixtures you're offering? Besides heat.
The only way I can accomplish the two points I listed above is by maintaining a low overhead operation and that's what we do.
We now only offer fluorescent models but soon will have HMI and tungsten as well. The fluorescent models are only capable of soft light and can never be hard. HMI and tungsten are capable of hard light but can be diffused as necessary. We felt we needed both soft and hard light to have a complete offering. Since I'm mostly trying to do energy efficient alternatives, HMI was the natural choice for hard light. HMI is what I call a "relatively cool light." Its still an incredibly intense and hot bulb but the light it produces is cooler (heatwise) than tungsten light and takes less wattage to produce the light it produces similar to fluorescent. Just try the experiment of putting up a 2000w tungsten fresnel and a 575w HMI fresnel which are close to each other in lumen output. Then stand about 5 feet away from both in their respective lights. Which one is cooler?
As for the tungsten models we'll be offering soon--I never had a plan to offer tungsten before but when I got the idea of lowering the price of HMI also it was clear I would need to find what I call "commodity fixtures" to use as the basis for the lights. Buying the tungsten models in large quantity and having some of the modified at the factory for the specialized needs of HMI bulbs made the most sense to me so that's why we're offering both tungsten and HMI now because I can get the fixture quantities up higher if I offer both models. Since many still like to use tungsten fixtures its a win/win for us and them.
In general, the innovation with cool lights (low energy) is rapidly moving forwards. LED's are expected to take a new jump by the end of this/beginning of next year. Already, Power LEDs are putting out tremendously more light with much less heat/energy loss than traditional LEDs (such as the one found on the "power on" on your computer). A similar development is happening with tubes and bulbs.
LEDs are a ways off still. 30 lumens per watt is the norm and thats only 50% better than the best tungsten. 50 to 90 is more the norm for ballast oriented lighting like fluorescent or HMI. They are simply more efficient and will be for a while. We have a 30w single high power LED from Taiwan that I had great hopes for but its too expensive and only puts out about 1800 lumens of light. We'd have a super expensive pepper fresnel which would be a novelty that only a few would buy. There's another 100w LED available here in China but I believe the lumens per watt are only about 25 which is very poor. When LEDs finally get where I want them, we'll have an LED product. In fact I have several projects on my bench but I won't sell any of them until I get them to the price point I think makes the most sense. I have a very interesting panel for instance, but its waiting for a fixture case and some other trimmings before we can sell it. It's nothing but a working circuit board at this point. Its always that last 10% on a project that seems to take the longest.
For the time being I'm using simple work lights with tubes and bulbs, all with low enegy fixtures and som + 6000 light coming out of them. Works for the moment, but I will soon upgrade and Cool Lights™ are something I'm really considering. Do you ship to Sweden Richard?
I've shipped to Norway, as well as several other parts of Europe. Why not Sweden? Just be sure you're acquainted with the customs taxes and such in your country as you would be libel for all those.
Peter Wittinghoff September 4th, 2007, 02:17 PM Great many thanx for your reply Richard. The overall picture you're giving is similar to the one I recive as a prospect/consumer.
My personal project I'm currently working on includes people in small rooms with akward lightning situation (gyms). I've tried to use some work lights flooding from the cealing and some softening on the side and back ("hair" allthough 50% of the persons have none :) ). Main problem here is lack of space and other people stumbling over cords etc. I'm trying to figure out if cool lights are the way to go forward or hmi is better space wise....
It's good news you're shipping to Sweden. Give me some time to make my mind up and I'll maybe send you a request. Either that or be your Scandinavian re-seller :) (hmm...come to think about it.....?!)
Richard Andrewski September 5th, 2007, 05:46 PM I think if you only consider space, the HMI units will always win. They come in far more compact models than fluorescent units (which are inherently a broad source), have a longer throw, can be softened if you need (but as stated before, fluorescent can't be "hardened" no matter what you do for those times you need a hard light).
Of course the cost, even in our models, is still a bit higher than fluorescent so sometimes other considerations may come into play as to which you choose.
Mark Sasahara September 8th, 2007, 01:21 PM Kino Flo explained to me the other day the difference between the 4 bulb 2' "Fatboy" and the Diva Light 400. Essentially, the Diva is dimmable, but this dimming will affect color balance if taken too far. Alternatively/in addition to dimming, the Diva's can be switched from four to two bulbs. They said for on location video, the Diva is really the light to use.
The "Fatboy" has a special ballast designed to keep its color balance neutral, but this is defeated by the fact that you really can't lower the current to the bulbs on the Fatboy like you can on the 4' model. So the "only" way to change light output is by turning off individual bulbs.
All in all, they were very nice and extremely helpful.
One way to reduce the output of a Kino is to add diffusion. Open the doors and add a large piece, and you will soften the light as well as reduce the output. You can move the light back, or move it in for more light, but remember, the larger the source, the softer the light. You can turn off individual bulbs on the newer select Kino Ballasts. You can also add ND, to maintain the large source and keep color temp the same.
The Divas and luminaires that use the G11 base tubes have a brighter and punchier light. The standard T12 tubes are lower in contrast.
Peter Moretti September 26th, 2007, 12:37 AM Thanks much Mark! BTW, do you have any experience using LED's? Just thought I'd ask ;).
Mark Sasahara September 26th, 2007, 08:20 AM I've used the small Lite Panels, which are really great. I like the 1x1, which is one foot square. There are large configurations, up to 4x4 which is 16 1x1 panels making a 4x4 light.
There are a few companies that are making LED lights for filmmaking:
http://www.nila.tv/
http://www.led-z.com/index.html
http://www.elementlabs.com/products/kelvintile
http://www.elementlabs.com/products/kelvinbrick
http://www.zylight.com/
http://lumapanel.com/
There are probably more. I've left Lite Panel out, figuring everyone has already been there.
I like the smallness of the Lite Panel and that it can be battery, or A/C powered. It's a great onboard camera light too. I like the quality of light, although it is a bit different than tungsten, or HMI. My one complaint about the batteries for LitePanels, is that they loose charge overnight, so you've got to charge them up first thing, every day.
Not an LED, but really cool:
http://www.rosco.com/us/video/litepad.asp
|
|